Skip to main content

Judgements of Taste and Their Deduction

  • Chapter
Kant’s Aesthetic Theory
  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

Kant proceeded from our actual experience of pleasure in judgements of taste to describe these judgements. To be valid, aesthetic judgements must be entirely subjective — being based only on a feeling of pleasure or displeasure; must be disinterested — free of determinate concepts, including determinate ends; must be singular — and so seek confirmation through other subjects; must be universal — in being based in ourselves on something we share with others; and are necessary — we can demand others’ agreement. In the process Kant rejects various other conceptions of the ‘aesthetic’ and defends his own claims. For example, he dismisses the sceptical claim that we cannot rely on pleasure as the basis for any validity, by showing that unless our ‘inner experience’ were similar, we could not communicate our objective experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See John Fisher and Jeremy Maitland, ‘The Subjectivist Turn in Aesthetics: A Critical Analysis of Kant’s Theory of Appreciation’, Review of Metaphysics, 27, (1974), 726–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. Karl Ameriks, ‘Kant and the Objectivity of Taste’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 23 (1983), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See T. W. Adorno, Aesthetic Theory (1984) for an illuminating discussion of objects and objectivity in Kant’s aesthetic theory.6 The Necessity of Judgements of Taste

    Google Scholar 

  4. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason (1956) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View translated by Mary J. Gregor (The Hague, 1974), Section 88, 277.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. See Gerd Buchdahl, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (1969), Chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Salim Kemal

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemal, S. (1997). Judgements of Taste and Their Deduction. In: Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389076_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics