Advertisement

What Can Voters Learn from Election Debates?

Chapter

Abstract

In the US presidential debates have become an expected feature of general election presidential campaigns. Begun in the 1960 campaign that featured incumbent vice president Richard Nixon and Massachusetts Senator John F. Kennedy, debates did not reappear until 1976 when incumbent president Gerald Ford challenged front runner, Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter, to join him in these nationally televised events. Since then presidential debates have occurred every four years.

Keywords

Policy Position Political Knowledge Presidential Campaign Issue Position Registered Voter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I. (1978) ‘The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality’ American Journal of Political Science 22: 680–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, L.B., LA. Sobowale, R.E. Cobbey, and C.H. Eyal (1978). ‘Debates’ effects on voters’ understanding of candidates and issues’ in G.F. Bishop, R.G. Meadow, and M. Greenwood, The Presidential Debate, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, G.F., R.W. Oldenick, and A.J. Tuchfarber (1978). ‘The presidential debates as a device for increasing the “rationality” of electoral behavior’ in G.F. Bishop, R.G. Meadow and M. Greenword. The Presidential Debates, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bogart, L. (1989). Press and public: Who reads what, where, when, and why in American newspapers (2nd edn). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
  5. Cappella, J.N. and K.H. Jamieson (1997) Spirals of Cynicism: The Press and The Public Good Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chaffee, S.H. and S.Y. Choe (1980) ‘Time of decision and media use during the Ford-Carter campaign’ Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaffee, S.H., X. Zhao and G. Leshner (1994) ‘Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992’ Communication Research, 21, 305–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drew, D. and D. Weaver, (1991) ‘Voter learning in the 1988 presidential election: Did the debates and media matter?’ Journalism Quarterly, 68, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fishel, J. (1985) ‘Presidents and Promises’. Congressional Quarterly Washington DC.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia, M.R. and P. Stark (1990) Eyes on the news. Poynter Institute for Media Studies St Petersburg, FL.Google Scholar
  11. Geer, J.G. (1988) ‘The Effects of Presidential Debates on the Electorate’s Preferences for Candidates’ American Politics Quarterly 16:4, 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graber, D.A. (1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide (2nd edn). Longman New York.Google Scholar
  13. Graber, D.A. and Y.Y. Kim (1978) ‘Why John Q. Voter did not learn much from the 1976 presidential debates’ in B. Ruben (ed.), Communication Yearbook 2 Transaction Books New Brunswick, NJ pp.407–21.Google Scholar
  14. Jamieson, K.H. and D.S. Birdsell (1988) Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Katz, E. and JJ. Feldman (1962) ‘The debates in the light of research. A survey of surveys’ in S. Kraus (ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 Indiana University Press Bloomington pp. 173–223.Google Scholar
  16. Kraus S. (ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 Indiana University Press Bloomington pp.269–97.Google Scholar
  17. Kraus, S. and D.K. Davis (1981) ‘Political debates’ in D.D. Nimmo and K.R. Sanders (eds), Handbook of political communication Lawrence Erlbaum Beverly Hills pp.273–96.Google Scholar
  18. Lanoue, DJ. (1991) ‘The “Turning Point”: Viewers’ reactions to the second 1988 presidential debate’ American Politics Quarterly 19: 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lanoue, DJ. (1992) ‘One that made a difference: Cognitive Consistency, Political Knowledge, and the 1980 presidential debate’. Public Opinion Quarterly. 56: 168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lanoue, D.J. and P.R. Schrott (1991) The joint press conference: The history, impact, and prospects of American presidential debates. Greenwood Press New York.Google Scholar
  21. Lemert, J.B. (1993) ‘Do televised presidential debates help inform voters?’ Journal of Broadcast and Electronic Media, 37, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lemert, J., W. Elliott, J. Bernstein, W. Rosenberg, and K. Nestvold (1991) News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns Praeger New York.Google Scholar
  23. Leuthold, D.A. and D.C. Valentine (1981) ‘How Reagan “won” the Cleveland debate: Audience predispositions and presidential debate “winners”’. Speaker amd Garel 18: 60–6.Google Scholar
  24. Meadow, R.G. and M. Jackson-Beeck (eds), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives Praeger New York pp. 179–96.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, A.H. and M. MacKuen (1979) ‘Informing the electorate: A national study’.Google Scholar
  26. Pew Research Center (1996) ‘Fewer happy with Clinton victory than with GOP congressional win’, http://www.peopIe-press.org/postrpt.htm.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, J.P. and M.R. Levy (1986) The main source: Learning from television news, Sage Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  28. Rose, D.D. (1979) ‘Citizen Uses of the Ford-Carter Debates’. Journal of Politics 41: 214–21.Google Scholar
  29. Sears, D.O. and S.H. Chaffee (1979) ‘Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies’ in S. Kraus (ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 Indiana University Press Bloomington pp.233–61.Google Scholar
  30. Times Mirror (1992) ‘Campaign ‘92 - Voters say “Thumbs Up” to Campaign, Process and Coverage, Survey XII’, http://www.people-press.org/library.htm.Google Scholar
  31. Zhu, J., J.R. Milavsky, and R. Biswas (1994) ‘Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge?’ Human Communication Research, 20, 302–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations