Skip to main content
  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

The emergence of nation states early in the social history of humanity was usually the result of the ability of one or more individuals to successfully wage war on people. The winner would be appointed as the head of state, usually the monarch or emperor. Having come to power, the usual outcome was the individual would seek to ensure that, upon their death, succession would pass to their male heir. Within this system, the monarch or emperor retained absolute control over the population by passing laws and a willingness to use violence or the threat of violence to ensure that there was no effective opposition. Although this leader held absolute power, in many cases their decisions were influenced or determined by a small group of advisors, who were typically granted titles and given tracts of lands (or ‘estates’) to ensure their loyalty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aberbach, J.D. and Rockman, B.A. (2006) ‘The past and future of political-administrative relations: research from bureaucrats and politicians to In the Web of Politics and beyond’, International Journal of Public Administration, 29, 977–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. and Guillory, C. (1997) ‘Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: a cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems’, American Political Science Review, 91 (1), 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J.D. (1992) The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D.C. and Tinnick, B. (2006) ‘Competing visions of parental roles and ideological constraint’, The American Political Science Review, 100 (2), 249–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beech, M. (2009) ‘A puzzle of ideas and policy: Gordon Brown as prime minister’, Policy Studies, 30 (1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. and Nanus, B. (1985) Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2005) ‘The behaviour of political leaders’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (3), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Karp, J.A. (2006) ‘Politicians like electoral institutions: self-interest, values, or ideology?’ The Journal of Politics, 68 (2), 434–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, P. and Ware, A. (1998) Funding Democratization (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J.M. (2003) Transformational Leadership (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M.C. (1991) The Economics of Business Culture: Game Theory, Transactions Costs and Economic Performance (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997) The Rise of the Network Society (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I. (2010) Entrepreneurship and the Small Firm (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I. (2011) Public Sector Management: Mission Impossible? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, H.L. and Ohanian, L.E. (1999) ‘The Great Depression in the United States from a neoclassical perspective’, Federal Reserve of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 23 (1), 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, H.L., and Ohanian, L.E. (2004) ‘New Deal policies and the persistence of the Great Depression: a general equilibrium analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, 112 (4), 779–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, O. and Valenty, L.O. (2001) Profiling Political Leaders: Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality and Behavior (Westport, Conn.: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garment, S. (1991) Scandal: The Crisis of Mistrust in American Politics (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbach, H. (2007) ‘Incentive contracts for politicians and binding election promises’, Economic Affairs, September, 85–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, B. and Shefter, M. (1990) Politics by Other Means: The Declining Importance of Elections in America (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannsgen, G. and Papadimitri, D. (2010) ‘Did the New Deal prolong or worsen the Great Depression?’ Challenge, 53(1), 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M. (1990) ‘The trouble with transformational leadership: toward a federalist ethic for organisations’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 5 (1), 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanos, M. and Margheritis, A. (2006) ‘Why do presidents fail? Political leadership and the Argentine crisis (1999–2001)’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 40 (4), 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, D. (2003) Constitutional Reform in the UK (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993) Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N.E. (1994) Put to Work: Relief Programs in the Great Depression (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlaes, A. (2007) The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression (New York: Harper Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, S. (1997) The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton (Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.B., Larimer, C.W., Littvay, L. and Hibbing, J.R. (2007) ‘Evolutionary theory and political leadership: why certain people do not trust decision makers’, The Journal of Politics, 69 (2), 285–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, D. and Taylor, S.W. (2003) ‘Presidential popularity: what matters most, macroeconomics or scandals?’ Applied Economics Letters, 10, 585–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderbaum, J. (1982) ‘Positional analysis and public sector decision making’, Journal of Economic Issues, 16 (2), 391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumber, H. (2004), ‘Scandal and media in the United Kingdom: from Major to Blair’, The American Behavioral Scientist, 47 (8), 1122–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumber, H. and Waisbord, S.R. (2004) ‘Introduction: political scandals and media across democracies, Volume II’, The American Behavioral Scientist, 47 (9), 1143–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, K. (2008) ‘Leadership’, Leadership and Management in Engineering, October, 387–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Ian Chaston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaston, I. (2012). Politicians. In: Public Sector Reformation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379350_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics