Skip to main content

The Joint Commission

  • Chapter
Talking to the Enemy
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

When diplomatic breakthroughs in relations between hostile parties have been made on a narrow but important front (for example on a ceasefire and mutual withdrawal of forces) but the improvement is insufficient to support a full normalisation, it is now common for existing channels of communication to be supplemented — and in some cases replaced — by one or more ‘joint commissions’. These bodies are standing committees composed of representatives of the hostile parties and also, sometimes, ‘observers’ from states or other entities that have been involved in any mediation of the conflict. The commissions generally have a formal focus confined to the issues upon which agreement in principle has been reached, but are sometimes employed for communication on other subjects of mutual interest as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Kyung Ae Park and Sung-Chull Lee, ‘Changes and prospects in inter-Korean relations’, Asian Survey vol. 32 (1992), pp. 429–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Richards, ‘Israel: Rome’s old problem’, The Independent, 31 July 1992. I am indebted to Elias Levy for drawing this to my attention.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Jenkins, European Diary, 1997–1981 ( London: Collins, 1989 ), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. A. Crocker, High Noon in Southern Africa: Making Peace in a Rough Neighbourhood (New York and London: Norton, 1992), pp. 420–1. This joint commission should not be confused with the much more limited ‘Joint Military Commission’ (sometimes known as the ‘Joint Angolan-South African Military Monitoring Commission’ or ‘combined military committee’) which was set up under the Geneva Protocol of the previous August.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also J. Merrill, ‘North Korea in 1992’, Asian Survey vol. 33 (1993), pp. 50–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. P. Stewart and L. B. Sherman, ‘Developments at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: 1981–1983’ in R. B. Lillich (ed.), 77te Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 1981–1983 ( Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1984 ), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. B. Quandt, Camp David: Peacemaking and Politics ( Washington, DC: Brookings, 1986 ), pp. 399–400.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 G. R. Berridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berridge, G.R. (1994). The Joint Commission. In: Talking to the Enemy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378988_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics