Skip to main content

The Rise and Fall of Management of Innovation. The Transformation of a Concept and of Management Practice in the Knowledge Economy

  • Chapter
Contemporary Management of Innovation
  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

Management of innovation (as a concept) was invented by Burns and Stalker (1961). Managing innovations, of course, was the natural outcome of a process, which, among innovation theorists, has been called the Schumpeter Mk II mode, that is, the transformation of innovations to corporate research and development (R&D) departments. This phenomenon, discussed in Schumpeter (1943 [19811), was one of the consequences of the development of corporate capitalism, observed by Berle and Means (1932) and Burnham (1941) already but was a process with origins (also) in the German chemical industry in the late 19th century (cf. Schmookler, 1957; Freeman, 1974; Mowery & Rosenberg, 1998). This chapter argues that the management of innovation concept has become increasingly irrelevant for the understanding of management problems — and thus as a basis for management decisions — related to industrial change. The conditions for this loss of relevance were present in the 1980s already, that is, during the phase when management of innovation theory developed as a research field in academia. This loss of relevance is also, it is argued, related to the emerging problem of isolating ‘innovations’ from activities in general in the knowledge-based economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abernathy, W.J. & Utterback, J.M. (1978), ‘Patterns of Industrial Innovation’, Technology Review (2), pp. 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. (ed.) (2000), Knowledge and Innovation in the New Service Economy ( Cheltenham: Edward Elgar ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. & Edge, D. (eds) (1982), Science in Context ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. ( 1973 [1976]) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society ( New York: Basic Books/Harper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A. & Means, G.C. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property ( New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerner, C., Macher, J. & Teece, D. (2001), ‘A Review and Assessment of Organizational Learning in Economic Theories’ (in Dierkes et al.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. ( 1974 [19771) Arbete och monopolkapital ( Stockholm: Raben & Sjögren).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, J.R. (1958), Automation and Management ( Boston: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, H. (1994), The relationship between science and technology’, Research Policy, 23, pp. 477–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. (1941), The Managerial Revolution ( New York: John Day).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. & Stalker, G.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation ( London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945), Science, the Endless Frontier ( Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000), The Information Age:… Vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society ( Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2nd edn ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A., Hagström, P. & Sölvell, Ö. (eds) (1998), The Dynamic Firm ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankbaar, B. (ed.) (2003), Innovation Management in the Knowledge Economy ( London: Imperial College Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes, M. et al. (eds) (2001), Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (2000), The Management of Technological Innovation ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G, Teece, D.J. & Chytry, J. (1998), Technology, Organization and Competitiveness ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G.L. & Lucena, J.C. (1995), ‘Engineering Studies’ in Jasanoff et al. (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, W. (1994), ‘Conceptualizing Knowledge Used in Innovation: A Second look at the Science-Technology Distinction and Industrial Innovation’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 19 (4), pp. 425–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. (1997), Resources, Firms and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-based Perspective ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1974), The Economics of Industrial Innovation ( Harmondsworth, Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge ( London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. & Johnston, R. (1974), The Roles of Science in Technological Innovation’, Research Policy, 3 (3), pp. 220–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. & Johnson, R. (1982), Science, technology and the development of the transistor (in Barnes & Edge, pp. 177–85).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedion, S. (1948), Mechanization Takes Command ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O. (1979), Technology Management and Markets ( Göteborg: Kulturkompaniet).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, D.A. (1984), From the American System to Mass Production 1800–1932 ( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. (2002), The Art of Innovation ( London: Harper Collins Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, H. & Schumann, M. (1987), ‘Limits of the Division of Labour’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 8, pp. 151–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, D. ( 1913 [19191) Principles of Industrial Organization ( New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. & Rosenberg, N. (1986), An Overview of Innovation’ (in Landau & Rosenberg, pp. 275–305).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koebke, C. (1941), Plant Production Control ( New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laestadius, S. (1992), Arbetsdelningens dynamik ( Lund: Arkiv Forlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, R. & Rosenberg, N. (eds) (1986), The Positive Sum Strategy ( Washington, DC: National Academy Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (1969), The Unbound Prometheus ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, T. (1997), Instituting Science ( Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. & Johnson, B. (1994), ‘The Learning Economy’, Journal of Industry Studies, 2, pp. 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1938), Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England ( Bruges: Osiris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C. & Rosenberg, N. (1998), Paths of Innovation (Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Musson, A. & Robinson, E. (1969), Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution ( Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, D. (1998), The Knowledge Economy ( Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. & Winther, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change ( Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1996), ‘The Knowledge Creating Company’ (in Starkey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1998), ‘A Theory of the Firm’s Knowledge-Creation Dynamics’ (in Chandler, Hagström & Sölvell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Nagata, A. (2000), ‘A Firm as a Knowledge-creating Entity: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Byosiere, P. (2001), ‘A Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation: Understanding the Dynamic Process of Creating Knowledge’ (in Dierkes et al.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. & Teece, D. (eds) (2001), Managing Industrial Knowledge ( London: Sage ).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1997), Oslo Manual ( Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. ( 1959 [1995]), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3rd edn ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroski, H. (1994), Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering ( New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D.J. de Sola (1982), ‘The Parallel Structures of Science and Technology’ (in Barnes & Edge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1950), ‘The interpretation of patent statistics’, Journal of the Patent Office Society, Feb., pp. 123–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1957), Invention and Economic Growth ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. ( 1911 [19681), The Theory of Economic Development ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. ( 1943 [1981]), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy ( London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K. (ed.) (1996), How Organizations Learn ( London: International Thomson Business Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D.E. (1997), Pasteurs Quadrant - Basic Science and Technological Innovation ( Washington, DC: Brookings Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J. (1998), The Theory of Innovation ( Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management ( Westport, CT: Greenwood Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. & Pisano, G. (1994), ‘The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), pp. 537–56 (reproduced in Dosi, Teece & Chytry, 1998 ).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J. & Pavitt, K. (1997), Managing Innovation - Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change ( Chichester: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. & Anderson, P. (eds) (1997), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change ( New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. & Moore, W. (eds) (1988), Readings in Management of Innovation ( Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J.M. (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation ( Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966), ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, pp. 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W.G. (1990), What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Historical Studies in the Nature and Sources of Engineering Knowledge ( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stamm, B. (2003), Managing Innovation, Design and Creativity ( Chichester: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1925), Science and the Modern World ( New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988), In the Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Staffan Laestadius

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laestadius, S. (2006). The Rise and Fall of Management of Innovation. The Transformation of a Concept and of Management Practice in the Knowledge Economy. In: Sundbo, J., Gallina, A., Serin, G., Davis, J. (eds) Contemporary Management of Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378841_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics