Skip to main content

Innovation as Institutional Change. A Complexity Approach

  • Chapter
Contemporary Management of Innovation
  • 115 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the literature on innovation management has focused on explaining how to be innovative in one’s own organization. Even though there is a variety of prescriptions, a key question in all of the perspectives relates to how manageable the innovation process is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Argyrys, C. (1990), Overcoming Organizational Defences: Facilitating Organizational Learning ( Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyrys, C. & Schön, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective ( Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1973), Steps to an Ecology of Mind ( St Albans: Paladin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, E.D. (1999), ‘Robust Adaptive Strategies’, Sloan Management Review, spring, pp. 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.L. & Eisenhardt, K. (1998), Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos ( Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. & Stalker, G.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation ( London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B. (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice ( Chichester: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chekland P.B. & Schöles, J. (1990), Soft Systems Methodology in Action ( Chichester: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, D.R. (1998), Leading at the Edge of Chaos: How to Create the Nimble Organization ( New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1991), ‘New Products: what separates winners from losers?’ (in Henry & Walker).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C.M. (1991), New Products Management ( Boston: Irwin, 3rd edn ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1985), ‘The Discipline of Innovation’, Harvard Business Review, May June, pp. 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. ( 1916 [1948]), Industrial and General Administration ( London: Pitman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. (1999), ‘Liberating Systems Theory: Towards critical systems thinking’, Human Relations, 36, pp. 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, J. (2001), Complexity and Innovation in Organizations ( London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1994), The Quark and the Jaguar ( New York: Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1988), Chaos: The Making of a New Science ( London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. (1994), How the Leopard Changed its Spots ( London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. (2002), The Emergence of Leadership: Linking Self-organization and Ethics ( London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. & Walker, D. (eds) (1991), Managing Innovation ( London: Sage ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huzzard, T. & Östergren, K. (2002), ‘When Norms Collide: Learning Under Organizational Hypocresy’, Brithish Journal of Management, 13 (2), pp. 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1988), ‘When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organization’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, pp. 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A. (1993), Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R. & Lorsch, J.W. (1967), Organization and Environment ( Boston: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E. & Pattison, P.E. (1999), ‘Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study’, Social Networks, 21, pp. 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1961), New Patterns of Management ( New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozeau, D., Langley, A. & Denis, J.L. (2002), ‘The Corruption of Managerial Techniques by Organizations’, Human Relations, 55 (5), pp. 537–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (1949), The Social Problems of Industrial Civilization ( London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1914), The Psychological Basis of Internationalism’, Survey, 23, pp. 604–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1923), ‘Scientific Method and the Moral Sciences’, International Journal of Ethics, 33, pp. 229–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1934), Mind, Self and Society ( Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies-Lyth, I. (1988), Containing Anxiety in Institutions. Essays, Vol. I ( London: Free Association Books ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, EJ & Rice, A.K. (1967), Systems of Organization: The Control of Task and Sentient Boundaries ( London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. & Quinn, J.B. (eds) (1991), The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts and Cases ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2nd edn ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R.T. (1990), Managing on the Edge: How Succes ful Companies Use Conflict to Stay Ahead ( London: Viking Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, J.M. & Cary, J. (2002), ‘Organizational justice, change anxiety, and acceptance of downsizing: preliminary tests ofan AET-Based Model’, Motivation an Emotion, 26, pp. 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1997), The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature ( New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B. (1991), ‘Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos’ (in Mintzberg & Quinn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, T.I. (1998), Strateging Thinking and the New Science: Planning in the Midst of Chaos, Complexity and Change ( New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy ( London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. (2002), Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Compexity Approach to Change ( London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, M. (2000), How we Believe: The Search for God in an Age of Science ( New York: W.H. Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1993), Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language ( London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R., Griffin, D. & Shaw, P. (2000), Compelexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? ( London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R.D. (2001), Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation ( London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. (1989), Does God Play Dice? ( Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. (1911), Scientific Management ( New York: Harper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, J.J., Gould, J.M. & Ford, D.N. (1997), ‘Systemic Creation of Organizational Anxiety: An Empirical Study’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33 (4), p. 477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M.J. (1992), Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organizations from an Orderly Universe ( San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R.A. (1994), ‘Organizational Innovation: Reveiw, Critique and Suggested Research Directions’, Journal of Management Studies, 31 (3), pp. 405–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Jaume Guia, Lluís Prats and Jordi Comas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guia, J., Prats, L., Comas, J. (2006). Innovation as Institutional Change. A Complexity Approach. In: Sundbo, J., Gallina, A., Serin, G., Davis, J. (eds) Contemporary Management of Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378841_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics