Skip to main content

Jude the Obscure

  • Chapter
Ambivalence in Hardy
  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

Hardy’s novels sometimes had a long gestation period, and the embryo of Jude the Obscure (1895) is often traced to a note Hardy jotted down in April 1888: ‘A short story of a young man — “who could not go to Oxford” — His struggles and ultimate failure. Suicide.’1 But before working out this idea fully in a novel-length study, Hardy rehearsed it in a short story, ‘A Tragedy of Two Ambitions’ (1888). In this neglected short story Hardy portrays the struggles and frustrations of two brothers, Joshua and Cornelius, whose academic aspirations are thwarted by a combination of meagre financial resources, class prejudice, and family circumstances in the shape of a feckless and drunken father. While Hardy’s sympathies evidently went out to the two brothers in their ‘untutored reading of Greek and Latin’, he was alive to the possibility that even the noblest intellectual aspiration could be both corrupt and corrupting.2 Thus, the story strikes a balance between being an eloquent plea on behalf of deserving but deprived students who fail to make it to the University, and offering an unsentimental critique of the selfish pursuit of academic ambition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Anne B. Simpson, ‘Sue Bridehead Revisited’, Victorian Literature and Culture, 19 (1991), p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Lucas is surely forgetting all these marginal women in the novel when he asserts that ‘we would need more in the way of women than the novel actually gives us’ before we can decide whether Sue is a ‘representative woman’ or simply a ‘pathological case’. See Lucas, The Literature of Change: Studies in the Nineteenth Century Provincial Novel (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1977; rev. ed. 1980), pp. 189–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edmund Gosse, ‘Mr Hardy’s New Novel’, St janzess Gazette, 8 November 1895, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kate Millett, Sexual Politics (New York: Doubleday, 1970; London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1971), pp. 130, 133.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katharine Rogers, ‘Women in Thomas Hardy’, Centennial Review, p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gail Cunningham, The New Woman and the Victorian Novel (New York: Harper & Row; London: Macmillan, 1978), p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cedric Watts, ‘Hardy’s Sue Bridehead and the “New Woman” ’, Critical Survey, 5: 2 (1993), p. 155. Watts points out the irony that while female writers allowed their heroines to break down, it was the ‘male playwrights’ — Ibsen and Shaw — who showed revolts successfully carried out.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boumelha, Hardy and Women, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Goode, Sue Bridehead and the New Womari, Mary Jacobus ed. Women Writing, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert C. Slack, ‘The Text of Hardy’s Jude the Obscure’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 11: 4 (1957), p. 272.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hardy, Jude the Obscure, The Wessex Novels, Vol. VIII (London: Osgood, McIlvaine & Co., 1896), p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Shanta Dutta

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dutta, S. (2000). Jude the Obscure. In: Ambivalence in Hardy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378346_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics