Skip to main content

Land Reform and Resource Management within Agrarian Production Cooperatives in Honduras

  • Chapter

Abstract

Agrarian production cooperatives (APCs) established during the Land Reform process in Honduras face serious problems with respect to income generation, labour mobilization and land use. Therefore, pressure to proceed with parcellation of these cooperative enterprises is imminent. Major arguments for parcellation refer to the incentives required to improve the efficiency of resource allocation and, to a lesser extent, for the creation of favourable prospects for sustainable land use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Berg, M. van den (1995) Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Production Cooperatives in Comayagua, Honduras, MSc. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.W. (1992) ‘Land and Water Problems: An Institutional Perspective’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics (64) pp. 834–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.W. (ed.) (1992) Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy ( San Francisco: ICS Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M.R., J. Melmed-Sanjak and K.A. Luz (1993) ‘Can Production Cooperatives resolve the conundrum of exclusionary growth? An econometric evaluation of Land Reform Cooperatives in Honduras and Nicaragua’, in C. Csaki and Y. Kislev (eds) Agricultural Cooperatives in Transition ( Boulder: Westview Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douma, S. and H. Schreuder (1991) Economic Approaches to Organizations ( Hempstead: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, D., F. Berkes, B.J. McCay and J.M. Acheson (1990) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-Two Years Later’, Human Ecology (18), 1 pp. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete, F., E.O. Heady and B.R. Holdren (1976) Economics of Cooperative Farming: Objectives and Optimum for Hungary (Leiden/Boedapest: Sijthoff/ Akadémia Kiadó).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W.C. Black (1992) Multivariate Data Analysis ( New York: Macmillan Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science (162), pp. 1243–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. and K. Otsuka (1993) The Economics of Contract Choice: An Agrarian Perspective ( Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B.A. and D.W. Bromley (1990) ‘Property Rights, Externalities, and Resource Degradation’, Journal of Development Economics (33), pp. 235–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakerson, R.J. (1992) ‘Analyzing the Commons: A Framework’, in D.W. Bromley (ed.) Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy ( San Francisco: ICS Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. and R. Gardner (1993) ‘Coping with Asymmetries in the Commons: Self-Governing Irrigation Systems can work’, Journal of Economic Perspectives (7), 4 pp. 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J.P. (1992) Land Reform and Structural Adjustment in sub-Saharan Africa: controversies and guidelines, Rome: FAO Economic and Social Development Paper No. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putterman, L. (1981) ‘On Optimality in Collective Institutional Choice’, Journal of Comparative Economics (5), pp. 392–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, R., C.J. Wattel, F. Funez and M. Ponce (1992) Perspectivas para la Consolidación Empresarial del Sector Reformado en Honduras, San José: CDR-VU Field Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, R. and P. Roebeling (1995) Options for the Consolidation of Land Reform Cooperatives: a Contract-Choice Approach, Paper presented to Congres ‘Agrarian Questions’, Wageningen Agricultural University, May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C.F. (1984) ‘Strategic Interdependence in Models of Property Rights’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics (66), pp. 807–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, E. and E. Ostrom (1992) ‘Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis’, Land Economics (68) 3, pp. 249–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1987) ‘The Management of Common Property Resources: Collective Action as an Alternative to Privatization or State Regulation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics (11), pp. 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruben, R., van den Berg, M. (1997). Land Reform and Resource Management within Agrarian Production Cooperatives in Honduras. In: de Groot, J.P., Ruben, R. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture in Central America. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378087_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics