Abstract
In the early years of glasnost, there was no explicit questioning of official interpretations of the February and October revolutions of 1917, or of Bolshevik theory and practice in the early years of Soviet power. Gorbachev and his supporters viewed the revolutionary period, from the turn of the century to the 1920s, as all of a piece. The vital role of Lenin and the Bolshevik Party continued to be emphasized; it was repeatedly claimed that Bolshevism had brought down the Russian monarchy, turned the workers and peasants against the Provisional Government, and formulated admirable decrees after the Revolution. The period 1917–22 continued to be seen as a period of heroic revolutionary struggle, when, despite bitter resistance by the old ruling classes and the whole capitalist world, the Bolsheviks had emerged victorious and started to construct a humane socialist society. Gorbachev’s speech in 1987 on the seventieth anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution made no reference to the negative side of Bolshevism: the creation of the Cheka, the dispersal of the Constituent Assembly in 1918, the Red Terror, the curbing of the power of the soviets and trade unions, the banning of factions within the party or the suppression of the Kronstadt Revolt in 1921. Gorbachev passed cursorily over the period of the Civil War and said nothing about the ruthlessness of the Bolsheviks either before or after the Revolution.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
M. S. Gorbachev, ‘Oktyabr’ i perestroika: revolyutsiya prodolzhaetsya’, Pravda (3 November 1987 ).
R. Service, Lenin: a Political Life, 2nd edn (London, 1991), p. 78;
see also R. Service, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev as a Political Reformer’, in R. J. Hill and J. A. Dellebrant, Gorbachev and Perestroika (London, 1989 ).
E. Acton, Rethinking the Russian Revolution (London, 1990), p. 33.
E. Meshcherskaya, Ogonek, no. 43 (1987), pp. 26–30; NM, no. 4 (1988), pp. 198–242.
A. Vasinskii, Izvestiya (6 September 1987 ).
M. Kuraev, Kapitan Dikshtein, NM, no. 9 (1987)
cf. E. Drabkina’s memoir Kronshtadt, god 1921, Yunost’, no. 10 (1987), which is written from the point of view of a participant in the force which crushed the rebels. The Kronstadt Revolt does not often figure in serious studies by historians; an exception is the summary by R. Medvedev, Yunost’, no. 11 (1988). The participants in the Kronstadt Revolt were not rehabilitated until January 1994; see Izvestiya (11 January 1994 ), p. 1.
O. Chaikovskaya, NM, no. 8 (1987), pp. 241–2.
V. E. Mel’nichenko, VI KPSS, no. 5 (1988), pp. 73–4.
I. Klyamkin, ‘Kakaya doroga vedet k khramu?’, NM, no. 11 (1987), p. 170. For further discussion of Klyamkin, see Davies, op. cit., pp. 24–6, 32–4; Nove, op. cit., pp. 40–3, 73–6.
N. Berdyaev et al., Vekhi: sbornik stat’ei o russkoi intelligentsia (M.. 1909); republished in LO, nos 7–12 (1990).
B. Pasternak, Doktor Zhivago, NM, nos 1–4 (1988).
V. Gusev, in ‘Doktor Zhivago’ Borisa Pasternaka: s raznykh tochek zreniya (M., 1990), p. 233.
For further discussion, see N. Cornwell, ‘Soviet Responses to “Doktor Zhivago”’, in A. McMillin (ed.), From Pushkin to ‘Palisandriia’ (London, 1990 ), pp. 201–15.
M. Voloshin ‘Grazhdanskaya voina’, NM, no. 2 (1988). reprinted in Yunost’, no. 10 (1990), p. 31.
M. Voloshin, Rossiya raspyataya, Yunost’, no. 10 (1990), pp. 24–31.
S. Zalygin, NM, no. 10 (1988), p. 198.
A. Tsipko, Nauka i zhizn, nos. 11–12 (1988) and nos 1–2 (1989).
M. Gorkii, Nesvoevremennye mysli, LO, nos 9, 10, 12 (1988).
I. Bunin, Okayannye dni, LO, nos 4, 6 (1989).
I. Bunin, Okayannye dni, 2nd edn (London, 1974), pp. 163.
I. Bunin, Vospominaniya (Paris, 1950), pp. 13–14.
See, for example, E. Mawdsley, The Russian Civil War (Boston, 1987 );
W. B. Lincoln, Red Victory: a History of the Russian Civil War (NY, 1989 ).
V. I. Startsev, ‘My s Leninym’, Pravda (3 April 1990 ).
V. Khodasevich, ‘Stat’i. Zapisnaya knizhka’, introduced by S. Bocharov, ‘No vse zhe ya prochnoe zveno’, NM, no. 3 (1990), pp. 160–7;
on the previous censorship of Khodasevich’s work, see J. Graffy, ‘The Literary Press’, in J. Graffy and G. Hosking (eds), Culture and the Media in the USSR Today (London, 1989 ), p. 145, n. 72;
Z. Gippius, Peterburgskie dnevniki 1919 goda, Gorizont, no. 11 (1990), pp. 28–46.
R. Rakhmatullin, ‘Za chto pogibli shestnatsat’ millionov rossiyan?’, Yunost’, no. 10 (1990), p. 19.
A. I. Denikin, ‘Ocherki russkoi smuty’, Oktyabr, nos 10–12 (1990); published with abbreviations, cutting out some of the military material. Published in full in VI, nos 3–12 (1990), nos 1–12 (1991) and nos 1–9 and 11–12 (1992), (original publication: vol. 1, Paris, 1921; vol. 2, Berlin, 1926 ).
M. Denikina, ‘Kak sozdavalis’ “Ocherki russkoi smuty”’, Oktyabr’, no. 10 (1990), p. 57.
I. Vinogradov, ‘Sem’ dnei tvoreniya’, Oktyabr’, no. 6 (1990), pp. 17–18.
J. Glad (ed.), Conversations in Exile: Russian Writers Abroad (Durham and London, 1993), p. 252.
See A. Nemzer, in Vzglyad, vol. 3 (M., 1991), p. 217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Rosalind Marsh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marsh, R. (1995). The Civil War and the Revolutionary Period, 1917–22. In: History and Literature in Contemporary Russia. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377790_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377790_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39103-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37779-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)