Skip to main content

UN Peacekeeping and the Use of Force: No Escape from Hard Decisions

  • Chapter
Security in a Post-Cold War World
  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

The traditional or ‘classic’ understanding of peacekeeping derives largely, though not exclusively, from the experience of United Nations field operations during the Cold War. Although the term itself does not appear in the UN Charter, a general consensus concerning its essential character gradually emerged in the course of the thirteen operations that were launched between 1948 and 1987. Peacekeeping came to denote a distinctive form of third-party intervention aimed at avoiding the outbreak or resurgence of violence between warring parties. Field operations usually involved the deployment of lightly equipped military personnel whose task it was to control violence by means other than enforcement or counter-violence. To this end, the activities of peacekeepers were governed by three closely related principles: host-state consent; minimum use of force except in self-defence; and impartiality as the determinant of operational activity.

The author would like to thank Michael Pugh for very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Rosalyn Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994 ), p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Gerard Ruggie, The UN and the Collective Use of Force: Whither or Whether?’ International Peacekeeping, Vol. 3, No. 4 (Winter 1996 ), p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richard Connaughton, ‘Time to clear the doctrine dilemma’, Jane’s Defence Weekly, 9 April 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Pugh, From Mission Cringe to Mission Creep? - Implications of New Peace Support Operations Doctrine, Forsvarsstudie No. 2/1997 ( Oslo: Institute for Defence Studies, 1997 ), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alain Rouvez, ‘French, British and Belgian Military Involvement’, in Making War and Waging Peace: Foreign Military Intervention in Africa, edited by David R. Smock ( Washington, DC: US Institute for Peace, 1993 ), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 University of Otago

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berdal, M. (1999). UN Peacekeeping and the Use of Force: No Escape from Hard Decisions. In: Patman, R.G. (eds) Security in a Post-Cold War World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377059_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics