Abstract
Alongside questions concerning the canon and canonicity, considerable critical attention has been given of late to the nature of the “classic” text in literature.1 The uneasy relationship between the classic text and the notion of canon, in secular or sacred literature, has very much to do, I contest, with the relationship on the broader scale between literature and religion. The great classic texts of literature — indeed of all the arts — betray by their very nature an anxiety, an unsteadiness, an accidental quality. It is precisely this which distinguishes them from the conventional, the everyday and the commonplace. They exist uneasily in time, yet they survive precisely because of this quality which is their genius, unrepeatable and revelatory. The huge blasphemy of any claim to “reproduce” the classic text and deny its unique quality is expressed by Jorge Luis Borges’s “Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote”: “The final term in a theological or metaphysical demonstration — the objective world, God, causality, the forms of the universe — is no less previous and common than my famed novel.”2 As David Tracy has put it, the accident of the classic becomes its destiny, its very flaws contributing to the greater whole.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example: T. S. Eliot, “What is a Classic?”, in Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot, ed. Frank Kermode (New York, 1975) pp. 115–32.
Frank Kermode, The Classic (New York, 1975).
W. J. Bate (ed.), Criticism: The Major Texts (New York, 1970).
David Tracy, The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism (London, 1981), esp. Part II: “Interpreting the Christian Classic”.
Jorge Luis Borges, Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings, ed. Donald A. Yates and James E. Irby (Harmondsworth, 1981) p. 66.
Samuel Johnson, Lives of the Poets (1779–81), vol. t (Oxford, 1955) p. 203.
See Harold Bloom, Ruin the Sacred Truths: Poetry and Belief from the Bible to the Present (Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1989) p. 125.
Irenaeus, in J. Stevenson (ed.), A New Eusebius (London, 1960) p. 122.
Frank Kermode, “The Canon”, in R. Alter and F. Kermode (eds), The Literary Guide to the Bible (London, 1987) p. 608.
See, further, David E. Klemm, “Back to Literature–and Theology?”, in David Jasper (ed.), Postmodernism, Literature and the Future of Theology (London, 1993) pp. 180–90.
James A. Sanders, Canon and Community (Philadelphia, 1984) pp. 67–8.
T. S. Eliot, “Religion and Literature”, in Selected Essays, 3rd edn (London, 1951) p. 390.
John B. Gabel and Charles B. Wheeler, The Bible as Literature: An Introduction (Oxford, 1986) p. 70.
Paul de Man, “Shelley Disfigured”, in Deconstruction and Criticism (New York, 1979) pp. 39–73.
Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (1946; trans. Willard R. Trask, Princeton, 1968) pp. 3–23.
Elaine Scarry, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (Oxford, 1985).
Robert Alter, The Art of Biblical Narrative (London, 1981) p. 22.
See The Book of J, trans. David Rosenberg, interpreted Harold Bloom (London, 1991) pp. 3–5.
H. W. Hertzberg, I and II Samuel: A Commentary, trans. J. S. Bowden, The Old Testament Library (London, 1964) p. 20.
For a detailed account of this episode, see Mieke Bal, Death and Dissymetry: The Politics of Coherence in the Book of Judges (Chicago and London, 1988) passim, esp. pp. 119ff.
Ibid., p. 187. See also my review of Death and Dissymetry, in Literature and Theology, vol. 5 (1991) 327–8.
Julian Barnes, A History of the World in 101/2 Chapters (London, 1989) p. 6.
Thomas Mann, Joseph and His Brothers, trans. H. T. Lowe-Porter (Harmondsworth, 1978) p. xiv.
Joseph Heller, God Knows (1984; Black Swan, 1985) p. 443.
Torgny Lindgren, Bathsheba, trans. Tom Geddes (London, 1989) P. 90.
Moelwyn Merchant, Inherit the Land (Llandysul, 1992) p. 10.
William Empson, Milton’s God (1961; Cambridge, 1981) pp. 276–7.
George Steiner, The Death of Tragedy (London, 1963) p. 4
David Tracy, “Creativity in the Interpretation of Religion: the Question of Radical Pluralism”, New Literary History, vol. 15 (1983–4) 296.
Michel Foucault, “Truth and Power”, in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, English trans. ed. Colin Gordon (New York, 1980) p. 133.
This sly phrase is taken from J. G. Ballard’s short story “The Life and Death of God”, in Low-Flying Aircraft (London, 1985) p. 143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 David Jasper
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jasper, D. (1995). The Literary Classic and the Tragedy of Fiction. In: Readings in the Canon of Scripture. Studies in Literature and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376083_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376083_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39135-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37608-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)