Beyond UNCED: Revenues and Reforms



This chapter will first examine both the current limitations and future opportunities for the reform of ODA, the financial basis of UN operations, and alternative sources of revenues to finance sustainable development. It will secondly address the agenda of UN structural reform, that goes beyond the Agenda 21-derived possibilities raised at UNCED and described in the preceding chapter.


Security Council Carbon Dioxide Emission Cent Target Environmental Security Global Environmental Facility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    For a balanced view of the UN’s problems, see D. Williams, The Specialized Agencies and the United Nations; The System in Crisis (Hurst and Co., 1987), especially Chapter V. Also J. Harrod and N. Schrijver (eds), The UN Under Attack (Aldershot: Gower, 1988). See also the compendious end-of-the-decade survey contained in M. Karns and K. Mingst (eds), The United States and the Multilateral Institutions (London: Unwin-Hyman, 1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paul Taylor, ‘Reforming the System: Getting the Money to Talk’, in P. Taylor and A. J. Groom, (eds), International Institutions at Work (Pinter, 1988), pp. 226–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Washington Weekly Report, XVIII-27, 11 September 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Resources Institute, World Resources 1992–93, op. cit., pp. 236–7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    UN, Agenda 21, The United Nations Pmgramme of Action from Rio, op. cit., Chapter 38. 9, p. 275.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    This summary is made in a Canadian ‘non-paper’ titled Ideas of Some Delegations on Institutional Arrangements for Consideration by the UNCED Preparatory Committee, Canadian Delegation, Geneva, August 1991, mimeo.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ernst von Weizsacker and Jochen Jesinghaus, Ecological Tax Reform (Zed Books, 1992), p. 23.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Washington Weekly Report, XVII-39, 6 December 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See United Nations News Summary, NS/35/92, UNIC, London, 15 October 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    United Nations ST/ADM/SER.B/386, 2 September 1992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibid., p. 3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Washington Weekly Report, XVIII, 35, 6 November 1992.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Washington Weekly Report, XIX-30, 7 October 1993.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Washington Weekly Report, XIX-31, 15 October 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Washington Weekly Report, XVIII-32, 16 October 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Washington Weekly Report, XVIII-21, 1 July 1992.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agenda 21, op. cit., Chapter 33.13, p. 250.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christian Aid, Aid Report No. 7, British Overseas Aid 1975–1990, ed. Jessica Woodroffe (Policy Unit, 1991).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    See The Independent, 6 October 1992.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Independent, 6 October 1992.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Grubb et al., op. cit., 1993, p. 175.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ibid., p. 177.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibid., p. 177.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    See, ‘The Global Environmental Facility’, Our Planet, Vol. 3, 1991, UNEP, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibid., p. 12.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Herald (Glasgow), 9 December 1992.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Beckerman, Pricing for Pollution, 2nd edn, Hobart Paper No. 66, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1990, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid., p. 29.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    For different bases of calculations, and comparisons between Japanese, EC and US carbon emissions, expressed in per capita and per unit of GNP terms, see M. Grubb, ‘The Greenhouse Effect: Negotiating Targets’, International Affairs, 66 (1990), pp. 73–4.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibid., pp. 80–1.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A famous example of obfuscation in Scotland during the late 1980s centred on Braemar in Deeside in which, despite the town experiencing several days of temperatures recorded at circa 24 F, its pensioner residents were disqualified from making claims for cold-weather payments because ternperature readings used as the basis for calculation were taken at Aberdeen, 50 miles east, on the coast.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Grubb, op. cit., 1990, p. 88.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    On the apparent irrelevance of natural resource endowments to national prosperity, see J. K. Galbraith, The Nature of Mass Poverty, (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1980), pp. 13–16.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    See Our Planet, Vol. 4, 3, (1992), p. 7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Grubb, op. cit., 1990, pp. 73–4.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Paterson and M. Grubb, ‘The international politics of climate change’, International Affairs, 68 (1992), p. 298.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. Douthwaite, The Growth Illusion (Green Books, 1992), pp. 211–13.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grubb, op. cit., 1990, pp. 83–4. For a comprehensive analysis of the question, see also Alan S. Manne and Richard G. Richels, Buying Greenhouse Insurance; The Economic Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emission Limits (MIT Press, 1992), especially Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grubb, op. cit., 1990, p. 81.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    On verification of a climate-change agreement, see Owen Greene, ‘Building a global warming convention: lessons from the arms control experience?, in Pledge and Review Processes: Possible Components of a Climate Convention, Workshop Report, M. Grubb and N. Steen, RIIA, 1991, pp. xxi–xxxiii. On the IAEA mandate to inspect, see M. F. Imber, The USA, ILO, UNESCO and IAEA (London: Macmillan, 1989), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Agenda 21, op. cit., Chapter 2. 22, p. 22.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    United Nations, Report on the Work of the Organization from the Forty-sixth to the Forty-seventh Session of the General Assembly, UN, September 1992, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    See Earth Audit; The World Environment 1972–1992, Where Now? (UNEP, 1992), pp. 22–3.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    See A. Rogers, The Earth Summit (Los Angeles, Global View, 1993), pp. 238–9.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Owen Greene, ‘Tackling Global Warming’, in P. Smith and K. Warr, (eds), Global Environmental Issues (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1991), p. 192.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    The Herald, Glasgow, 5 July 1993.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    United Nations A/CONF. 151/PC/64, p. 6Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    P. Vallely, Bad Samaritans (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1990), p. 301.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    US General Accounting Office, Developing Country Debt; Debt Swops for Development and Nature Provide Little Debt Relief, United States General Accounting Office, GAO/NSAID-92–14, December 1991, p. 9.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ibid., p. 11.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ibid., p. 13.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    These and many other cases are well summarised by Caroline Thomas, The Environment in International Relations, RIIA, 1992, pp. 124–35. See M. F. Imber, ‘Environmental security; a task for the UN system’, Review of International Studies 17, (1991), pp. 201–12. On freshwater questions, see Malin Falkenmark, ‘Fresh water as a factor in strategic policy action’, in Arthur Westing (ed), Global Resources and International Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 85–114.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    The literature on environmental security is well discussed by Thomas, op. cit., 1992, pp. 115–54.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    These remarks and comparisons are contained in the report prepared by the Secretary-General at the invitation of the Security Council, which places a discussion of new peacekeeping activities in a wider post-Cold War context. See Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Agenda for Peace (New York: United Nations, 1992), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Adapted from tables in D. Deudney, ‘The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security’, in Millennium, 19, 1990, pp. 464–6.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    J. Womack, D. Jones and D. Roos, The Machine that Changed the World (Rawson, 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark F. Imber 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations