Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Macmillan’s ((SMSH))

  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

The onslaught of British forces under General Sir Edmund Allenby in the Palestine Campaign of 1917-18 led to the surrender of Turkey at the end of October 1918. Britain replaced the Ottoman Empire as the dominant power in the Middle East.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. B. H. Liddell Hart, History of the First World War (London: Cassell, 1970 [first published in 1930]), pp. 553–62

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. T. Massey, How Jerusalem was Won (London, Constable, 1919)

    Google Scholar 

  3. General Sir Archibald Wavell, Allenby (London: Harrap, 1940), Chs VIII to X, June 1917 –October 1918

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sidney Pollard, The Development of the British Economy 1914–1950 (London: Edward Arnold. 1962), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stephen Roskill, Hankey: Man of Secrets, Vol. II: 1919–1931 (London: Collins, 1972), p. 205. Sir Maurice Hankey was secretary of the Cabinet and of the Committee of Imperial Defence.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. C. Peden, British Rearmament and the Treasury: 1932–1939 (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1979), p. 3. See also Mowat op. cit., p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Major-General Sir C. E. Callwell, Field-Marshal Sir Henry Wilson: His Life and Diaries, Vol. II (London: Cassell, 1927), p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See also Brian Bond, British Military Policy Between the Two World Wars (Oxford. Clarendon Press. 1980), pp. 30–1

    Google Scholar 

  9. See W. K. Hancock, and M. M. Gowing, British War Economy (London: HMSO, 1949), pp. 45, 63; Gibbs, op.cit., Chs I—III; Peden, op. cit., p. 7; Roskill, op.cit., pp. 536–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a critical evaluation of the standard views of historians about the influence of Treasury control on strategic policy, see John Robert Ferris, The Evolution of British Strategic Policy, 1919–1926 (London: Macmillan, 1989), Chs 2, 11.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert, Martin, Winston S. Churchill, Vol. V: 1922–1939 (London: Heinemann, 1976), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keith Middlemas and John Barnes, Baldwin. A Biography (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969), pp. 339–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andrew Boyle, Trenchard (London: Collins, 1962), p. 526. Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Hugh Trenchard was Chief of Air Staff 1918 and 1919 to 1929. He was Commissioner of Metropolitan Police from 1931 to 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boyle, pp. 381–2, 386–7. See also David E. Omissi, Air Power and Colonial Control: The Royal Air Force 1919–1939 (Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1990). pp. 25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Major-General Sir Charles W. Gwynn, Imperial Policing (London: Macmillan, 1934, reprinted 1936), p. 8: ‘In Iraq … there have been numerous interesting cases of the employment of ground troops in cooperation with air action to suppress disaffection, apart from cases where air action alone was sufficient.’ See also Boyle, pp. 390–1; Omissi, Ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bowden, Tom, The Breakdown of Public Security: The Case of Ireland 1916–1921 and Palestine 1936–1939 (London: Sage, 1977), p. 205, wrote: ‘Many of the arms used in the period 1936–39 had originally left Palestine for the Syrian revolt of 1925–26, only to begin returning to Palestine from 1929 onwards.’ His source was AIR 2/1568.

    Google Scholar 

  17. PREM 1/102, ff. 456–7, Confidential Despatch from the High Commissioner to the Colonial Secretary, 17 January 1930, Enclosure II: ‘Memorandum enumerating the Decisions taken in regard to the Establishments of the Police and Defence Forces in Palestine and Trans-Jordan since 1925 and on Defence Arrangements generally.’ See also L. S. Amery, My Political Life, Volume II: War and Peace 1914–1929 (London: Hutchinson, 1953), p. 319. After the 1929 riots, Amery regretted the decisions he had helped to take: Weizmann archive, Rehovot, 1929 chronology ‘Maas Diary’, 3 December 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chancellor Papers, Box 12/6, ff. 68–9, copy of Despatch from the Colonial Secretary to the High Commissioner for Palestine, 14/4/27, Enclosure IV of unsigned ‘Memorandum on the Fixing of the Establishment of the Police and Defence Forces in Palestine since 1925 and as to the Defence Arrangements generally’, 27 September 1929. See also Michael J. Cohen, Churchill and the Jews (London: Cass. 1985). pp. 151–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart Symes, Tour of Duty (London: Collins, 1946), pp. 56–7. The ‘savings’ did not contribute much to the financing of reforms for the benefit of the rural poor. See the Addendum to L. J. Stein’s memorandum on defence and security, 25/9/29, CZA 6894.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Martin Kolinsky

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kolinsky, M. (1993). The Thin Line of Security. In: Law, Order and Riots in Mandatory Palestine, 1928–35. Macmillan’s Studies in Military and Strategic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375659_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375659_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38996-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37565-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics