Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

No attempt is made here towards developing a framework of analysis of semi-colonialism and the phenomenon of the informal empire. This has already been attempted elsewhere.1 For the historian, an imposed framework is rarely satisfactory as it usually cannot cater for, or be easily applied to, the unique and the specific which, more often than not, preoccupy the historian. Nevertheless, two broad problems, partly methodological, arise in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Osterhammel, ‘Semi-Colonialism and Informal Empire in Twentieth-Century China: Towards a Framework of Analysis’ in W.J. Mommsen and J. Osterhammel (eds), Imperialism and After: Continuities and Discontinuities (London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.J.P. Taylor, Europe: Grandeur and Decline (Harmondsworth, 1967), p. 166. On this question see also Warren I. Cohen’s presidential address to the members of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, Diplomatic History, 9, No. 2 (Spring, 1985), pp. 101–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See N. Clifford, Britain’s Retreat from China (London, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Fieldhouse, ‘“A New Imperial System”? The Role of the Multinational Corporations Reconsidered’, in W.J. Mommsen and J. Osterhammel (eds), Imperialism and After: Continuities and Discontinuities (London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See S. Cochran, Big Business in China: Sino-Foreign Rivalry in the Cigarette Industry 1890–1930 (Massachusetts,1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. and R.W. Huenemann, The Dragon and the Iron Horse: The Economics of Railroads in China 1876–1937 (Massachusetts, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S.L. Endicott, Diplomacy and Enterprise - British China Policy 1933–37 (British Columbia, 1975), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Robinson and J. Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians: The Official Mind of Imperialism (London, 1961, reprinted 1974), p. 465.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.A. Cohen, Discovering History in China: American Historical Writing on the Recent Chinese Past (New York, 1984), Chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Wallerstein, The Politics of the World-Economy — The States, the Movements, and the Civilization (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 81–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Lichtheim, Imperialism (Middlesex, 1974), pp. 141–2, 158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Aron Shai

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shai, A. (1996). Introduction. In: The Fate of British and French Firms in China, 1949–54. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375628_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375628_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39747-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37562-8

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics