Skip to main content

On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (1980)

  • Chapter
  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Harberger (1978b) argues against using distributional weights on two grounds.1 (1) If the weights differ too much between people, they could be used to justify excessively inefficient projects. (2) Even so, the distributionalweights approach can lead to regressive marginal tax rates, which the public considers inequitable. This is Morton’s Fork indeed.2 I shall consider the two prongs in sequence.

Journal of Political Economy, 88(5) (1980), pp. 1041–7. © 1980 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashenfelter, O. and J.J. Heckman (1973) ‘Estimating labor supply functions’, in G. Cain and H.W. Watts (eds), Income Maintenance and Labor Supply (Chicago: Rand McNally).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.V., E. Levin and D. Ulph (1976) ‘Estimates of hours supplied by married male workers in Great Britain’, Scottish loumal of Political Economy, 23 (November), 261–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.C. (1973) Taxation and Welfare (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, AC. (1978a) ‘Basic needs versus distributional weights in social cost-benefit analysis’, University of Chicago, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.C. (1978b) ‘On the use of distributional weights in social cost-benefit analysis’, loumal of Political Economy, 86(2), pt 2 (April), S87-S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.L. (1949) ‘Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation’, Biometrika, 36 (June), 149–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J.A. (1971) ‘An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation’, Review of Economic Studies, 33 (April), 175–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A. (1969) A cost-benefit analysis and the theory of public finance’, loumal of Economic Literature, 7 (September), S797-S806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stem, N.H. (1976) ‘On the specification of models of optimum taxation’, loumal of Public Economy, 6 (July-August), 123–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stem, N.H. (1977) ‘Welfare weights and the elasticity of the marginal valuation of income’, in M.J. Artis and AR. Nobay (eds), Studies in Modern Economic Analysis (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Richard Layard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Layard, R. (1999). On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (1980). In: Tackling Inequality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375284_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics