Abstract
Iris Murdoch is an eccentric writer. Besides the oddity of her characters, their world and the plots they get wrapped up in (a strangeness that nevertheless taps into something in ourselves we all recognize) her fiction seems to position itself outside the central patterns of the post-war British novel. Her novels are difficult to place in any particular category (realism, comedy of manners, prose romance, metaphysical thriller, ‘late modernism’), seeming to constitute one all by themselves. In her philosophy and literary theory, Murdoch has consistently taken up an unfashionable position: she is a metaphysician in an age suspicious of metaphysics, a novelist who wishes to preserve the function of literary realism in a period marked by the ‘crisis of representation’. While the generation of late-twentieth-century writers to which she belongs is more self-conscious about their art and the ideas which inform it than any previous one, Murdoch’s status as a philosopher in her own right gives unusual emphases to her own self-awareness. Naturally, then, the eccentricity of her position as thinker and writer is a line many studies of her work have chosen to pursue, concentrating on the ways in which she works against the flow of the contemporary novel.
We can no longer take language for granted as a medium of communication. Its transparency has gone. We are like people who for a long time looked out of a window without noticing the glass — and then one day began to notice this too. The beginnings of this new awareness lie far back … but it is only within the last century that it has taken the form of a blinding enlightenment or a devouring obsession.
Iris Murdoch, Sartre: Romantic Rationalist(64)
I think in particular that it is in the aesthetic of the sublime that modern art (including literature) finds its impetus …
Jean-François Lyotard, ‘Answering the Question: What is Postmodernism?’ (77)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe and Jean-Luc Nancy, The Literary Absolute: the Theory of Literature in German Romanticism (New York: State University of New York Press, 1988)
Paul Hamilton, Wordsworth (Brighton: Harvester, 1986).
I am arguing here that Murdoch’s attitude to Freud is ambivalent. She is by no means a ‘Freudian’ — as she takes pains to insist (in the interview with Rose [1968], for example) — yet it is going too far to say that she is involved in a ‘feud’ with Freud, as Jack Turner does in Murdoch v. Freud: A Freudian Look at an Anti-Freudian (1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Bran J. Nicol
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nicol, B. (2004). Revisiting the Sublime and the Beautiful: Iris Murdoch’s Realism. In: Iris Murdoch. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374751_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374751_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40099-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37475-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)