Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Revisionist Ascendancy

  • Chapter
Economic Strategy and the Labour Party

Abstract

Writing in 1962, the former Labour MP and ex-cabinet minister, Hugh Dalton gave high praise to Tony Crosland’s The Future of Socialism: ‘This is a most important book, brilliant, original and brave. It has already had much clarifying influence on current thought, both inside and outside the Labour party. And its influence will grow.’1 Five years earlier when Labour had published Industry and Society, the New Statesman had reflected on Crosland’s influence on the party alongside that of Hugh Gaitskell and Socialist Union: ‘The policies bear the imprint of the “new thinkers” rather than of any other group within the movement.’2 The new document was hailed as a major development in socialist thinking. The Spectator commented, ‘Their intention is not to end capitalism but to become capitalists too.’3 One group of socialist MPs lamented it as a ‘policy of retreat’.4 During the 1950s Revisionism became firmly established as the basis of Labour’s social democracy.5

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hugh Dalton, High Tide and After (Muller, London, 1962), p. 412.

    Google Scholar 

  2. New Statesman, 20 July 1957, p. 73. It noted that compromises had been made within the drafting committee.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Spectator, 19 July 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Times, 29 July 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Vernon Bogdanor, ‘The Labour Party in Opposition 1951–1964’, in Vernon Bogdanor and Robert Skidelsky (eds), The Age of Affluence 1951–1964 (London, Macmillan, 1970), pp. 78–116;

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Coates, The Labour Party and the Struggle for Socialism (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 75–96;

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Howell, British Social Democracy (London, Croom Helm, 1976), 174–244.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Samuel Beer, Modern British Politics (London, Faber and Faber, 1965), pp. 188–200;

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Butler, The British General Election of 1955 (London, Macmillan, 1955), pp. 13–15, 24–5;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stephen Haseler, The Gaitskellites (London, Macmillan, 1969), pp. 48–67;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Ralph Miliband, Parliamentary Socialism (Merlin, London, 1972, originally 1962), pp. 315–36;

    Google Scholar 

  12. and Patricia Pugh, Educate, Agitate, Organise (London, Methuen, 1984), p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Denis Healey, Socialism with a Human Face (London, 1981), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robert Currie, Industrial Politics (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 179–90; S. Haseler, The Gaitskellites, pp. 99–107;

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. A. Robson, Nationalised Industry and Public Ownership (London, George Allen and Unwin, 1960), pp. 474–85;

    Google Scholar 

  16. and H. Weiner, British Labour and Public Ownership (London, Stevens, 1958), pp. 78–95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Labour party, Industry and Society (1957), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Industry and Society, pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Industry and Society, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Labour party, Labour Believes in Britain (1949), pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. LPACR (1949), p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ‘Report to Policy Committee of Sub-Committee on Privately Owned Industry’, RD: 236/December 1948, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Labour party, Challenge to Britain (1953), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ‘The Future of Private Industry’, RE: 113/November 1956, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Labour party, Plan for Progress (1958), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Industry and Society, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Labour party, Signposts for the Sixties (1961), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. A. Robson, Nationalized Industry and Public Ownership, p. 478.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Labour party, Britain Belongs to You (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lewis Minkin, The Labour Party Conference (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1980), pp. 237–41 and 325–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See D. Howell, British Social Democracy, 186–90; David Howell, The Rise and Fall of Bevanism, (ILP, no date); Mark Jenkins, Bevanism Labour’s High Tide (Nottingham, Spokesman, 1979);

    Google Scholar 

  32. and Alan Warde, Consensus and Beyond (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1982), pp. 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Haseler, The Gaitskellites, p. 20; D. Howell, British Social Democracy, pp. 139–49.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Barbara Castle, ‘The Socialist Alternative’, Fabian Journal, 5 (1952), pp. 13–17, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Quoted by M. Jenkins, Bevanism, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Susan Crosland, Tony Crosland (London, Jonathan Cape, 1982), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Petronius, Fabian Journal, 6 (1952), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Richard Crossman, Planning for Progress (London, Hamish Hamilton, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  39. As well as Contemporary Capitalism (London, Victor Gollancz, 1956), see Strachey’s review of Crosland’s The Future of Socialism, ‘The New Revisionist’, New Statesman, 6 October 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Michael Newman, John Strachey (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1989), p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Lin Chun, The British New Left (Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  42. Michael Kenny, The First New Left (London, Lawrence and Wishart, 1995), pp. 119–67;

    Google Scholar 

  43. and David Widgery (ed.), The Left in Britain (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1976), pp. 509–14.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See John Hughes, ‘New Left Economic Policy’, in Robin Archer et al (eds), Out of Apathy (London, Verso, 1989), pp. 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  45. The Insiders, in Universities and Left Review, 3 (1958), pp. 24–64, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Michael Barratt Brown, ‘The Controllers’, parts I–III, Universities and Left Review, 5, 6, 7 (1958–9), pp. 53–61, 38–41, 43–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Michael Barratt Brown, ‘Plan for Progress’, Universities and Left Review, 6 (1959), pp. 12–18, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  48. John Hughes, ‘The Commanding Heights’, New Left Review, 4 (1960), pp. 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. John Hughes, ‘The British Economy: Crisis and Structural Change’, New Left Review, 21 (1963), pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  50. John Hughes, ‘Steel Nationalisation and Political Power’, New Reasoner, 2 (1957), pp. 6–29;

    Google Scholar 

  51. and John Hughes, Plan for Steel Re-Nationalisation (Fabian Research Series 198, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Clive Jenkins, ‘Retreat: The Labour Party and the Public Corporations’, p. 58, The Insiders; and Clive Jenkins, Power at the Top (London, MacGibbon and Kee, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Michael Artis and Peter Sedgewick, ‘The Scope of Nationalisation’, in The Insiders, pp. 38–41, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  54. John Hughes, ‘An Economic Policy for Labour’, New Left Review, 24 (1964), pp. 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ken Coates, ‘Workers’ Control’, New Left Review, 23 (1964), pp. 69–71, p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ken Alexander and John Hughes, A Socialist Wages Plan (New Left discussion booklet, 1959), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  57. For a discussion see H. Turner et al, ‘A Polemic on the Wages Plan’, New Reasoner, 10 (1959), pp. 73–106.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See Ralph Miliband, ‘The Politics of Contemporary Capitalism’, New Reasoner, 5 (1958), pp. 39–52;

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ralph Miliband, ‘The Transition to the Transition’, New Reasoner, 6 (1958), pp. 35–48;

    Google Scholar 

  60. and John Saville, ‘The Welfare State’, New Reasoner, 2 (1957), pp. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Notably John Hughes. See also Ken Alexander, ‘Premier Wilson’s Plan’, New Left Review, 9 (1961), pp. 53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Quoted by Philip Williams, Hugh Gaitskell (London, Jonathan Cape, 1979), p. 389.

    Google Scholar 

  63. See Anthony Crosland, The Conservative Enemy (London, Jonathan Cape, 1962), pp. 68–96

    Google Scholar 

  64. and M. Barratt Brown, ‘Crosland’s Enemy’, New Left Review, 19 (1963), pp. 23–31. See also Michael Kenny, The First New Left, pp. 129–36.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ralph Samuel, ‘Born Again Socialism’, in R. Archer et al, Out of Apathy, pp. 39–58, p. 49. John Hughes is dubious about the impact of these proposals on Labour; interview, February 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  66. New Reasoner, 3 (1957–58), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Peter Sedgewick, ‘The Two New Lefts’, in D. Widgery (ed.), The Left in Britain, p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Anthony Crosland, The New Socialism (Dissent, Melbourne, 1963), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  69. An early critique of economic policy, which stressed the UK’s commitments abroad, was Andrew Shonfield, UK Economic Policy Since the War (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Following Alan Warde’s term ‘technocratic-socialism’, see A. Warde, Consensus and Beyond, pp. 94–109. See also Paul Foot, The Politics of Harold Wilson (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1967); S. Haseler, The Gaitskellites, pp. 243–9; D. Howell, British Social Democracy, pp. 236–40; and R. Miliband, Parliamentary Socialism, pp. 353–60.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Harold Wilson, The New Britain: Labour’s Plan (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1964), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Harold Wilson, Purpose in Politics Selected Speeches (London, Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1964), pp. 14–28.

    Google Scholar 

  73. See also Tony Benn, Out of the Wilderness (London, Hutchinson, 1987), pp. 82–3;

    Google Scholar 

  74. and Labour party, Labour and the Scientific Revolution (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  75. A. Warde, Consensus and Beyond, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  76. See J. Sargent, Out of Stagnation (Fabian Tract 343, 1963), p. 29;

    Google Scholar 

  77. and M. Stewart and R. Winsbury, An Incomes Policy for Labour (Fabian Tract 350, 1963), pp. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  78. See, for example, the unabridged version of Crosland’s The Future of Socialism (London, Jonathan Cape, 1956), pp. 444–5.

    Google Scholar 

  79. H. Wilson, The New Britain: Labour’s Plan, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  80. M. Stewart and R. Winsbury, An Incomes Policy for Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Contrast A. Crosland, Can Labour Win?, p. 19; and A. Crosland, The Conservative Enemy, pp. 158–159. See also David Butler and Anthony King, The British General Election of 1964 (London, Macmillan, 1965), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  82. A. Crosland, The Future of Socialism, preface.

    Google Scholar 

  83. See Harold Wilson, Post-War Economic Policies in Britain (Fabian Tract 309, 1957); and Harold Wilson, ‘A Four Year Plan for Britain’, New Statesman, 24 March 1961, pp. 462–8.

    Google Scholar 

  84. See also Ben Pimlott, Harold Wilson (London, Harper Collins, 1992), p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  85. D. Butler and A. King, The British General Election of 1964, pp. 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Labour party, Labour in the Sixties (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Signposts for the Sixties, pp. 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Labour party, Let’s Go with Labour for the New Britain (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  89. See Wilfred Beckerman (ed.), The Labour Government’s Economic Record 1964–1970 (London, Duckworth, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  90. David Butler and Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, The British General Election of 1970 (London, Macmillan, 1971), pp. 1–46; P. Foot, The Politics of Harold Wilson;

    Google Scholar 

  91. Brian Lapping, The Labour Government 1964–70 (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  92. Clive Ponting, Breach of Promise (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  93. Michael Stewart, The Jekyll and Hyde Years (London, Dent, 1977), pp. 21–118;

    Google Scholar 

  94. and Phillip Whitehead, The Writing on the Wall (London, Michael Joseph, 1985) pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Michael Artis, ‘Fiscal Policy for Stabilisation’, in W. Beckerman (ed.), The Labour Government’s Economic Record 1964–1970, pp. 262–99, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  96. D. Howell, British Social Democracy, p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  97. See G. Dorfman, Government Versus Trade Unionism in British Politics Since 1968 (London, Macmillan, 1979), pp. 8–49;

    Google Scholar 

  98. W. Fishbein, Wage Pvestraint by Consensus (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984), pp. 53–6;

    Google Scholar 

  99. and Leo Panitch, Social Democracy and Industrial Militancy, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976), pp. 165–203;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  100. The leftwing Tribune group tended towards negative criticisms of the Wilson government, with a few positive proposals added on briefly without any theoretical basis. See Tribune group, ‘Never Again’, Tribune, 20 July 1967; and Tribune group, ‘A New Economic Strategy for Labour’, Tribune, 12 January 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Michael Foot, ‘Credo of the Labour Left’, New Left Review, 49 (1968), pp. 19–34, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Stuart Hall, Raymond Williams, and E. P. Thompson, May Day Manifesto (May day pamphlet, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Raymond Williams (ed.), May Day Manifesto 1968 (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1968), pp. 41–4.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Another source of opposition to the Labour government was the Institute for Workers’ Control which had been founded in 1964 to lobby for industrial democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Labour party, Labour’s Economic Strategy (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  106. The demands for industrial democracy had surfaced at Labour’s conference in 1967. Labour’s Economic Strategy, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Labour party, Agenda for a Generation (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Labour party, Now Britain’s Strong — Let’s Make It Great to Live in (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  109. See T. Burgess et al, Matters of Principle Labour’s Last Chance (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1968);

    Google Scholar 

  110. and Peter Townsend and Nicholas Bosanquet (eds), Labour and Inequality (London, Fabian Society, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  111. For a defence see A. Crosland, Socialism Now (London, Jonathan Cape, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  112. R. Crossman, Socialism and Planning (Fabian Tract 375, 1967); and Wilson’s own mammoth volume, The Labour Government 1964–1970 (London, Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  113. A. MacIntyre, ‘The Strange Death of Social Democratic England’, in D. Widgery (ed.), The Left in Britain, pp. 235–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bristol, UK

    Mark Wickham-Jones (Lecturer in Politics)

Authors
  1. Mark Wickham-Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1996 Mark Wickham-Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wickham-Jones, M. (1996). The Revisionist Ascendancy. In: Economic Strategy and the Labour Party. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373679_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation