Skip to main content

Vietnam and the Debate on Intervention in Bosnia

  • Chapter

Abstract

Previous chapters have stressed the diminishing importance of Yugoslavia as a security interest with the end of the Cold War and the tendency of Americans to look inward to domestic issues and avoid foreign obligations and burdens. But the legacy of the Vietnam War also contributed to both the American public’s lack of enthusiasm for a Bosnian involvement and the foreign-policy elite’s perception that intervention in the former Yugoslavia would have the ‘tar baby’ effect of the Vietnam involvement. This thinking was particularly apparent during the Bush administration’s decisions on Bosnia. This chapter will explore the nature of that impact and the problems connected with the attempt to use the Vietnam analogy for analysis of the Bosnian War.

Keywords

  • Foreign Policy
  • Military Action
  • Bush Administration
  • Security Interest
  • Pearl Harbor

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/9780230372764_9
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-230-37276-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Useful sources on Vietnam include F.M. Kail, What Washington Said: Administration Rhetoric and the Vietnam War:1949–1969 (NY: Harper and Row, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. George McTurnan Kahin and John W. Lewis, The United States and Vietnam (NY: Delta, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Theodore Draper, Abuse of Power (NY: Viking, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. and Donald S. Zagoria, Vietnam Triangle: Moscow, Peking, Hanoi (NY: Pegasus, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alex Roberto Hybel, How Leaders Reason: US Intervention in the Caribbean Basin and Latin America (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1990) especially pp. 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976) pp. 217, 220.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yuen Foong Khong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted in David Halberstam, The Best and the Brightest (NY Random House, 1972) p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Wayne Bert

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bert, W. (1997). Vietnam and the Debate on Intervention in Bosnia. In: The Reluctant Superpower. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372764_9

Download citation