Abstract
The naturalist aesthetics which resulted from the attachment of art to science was not without its ambiguities. Both the key terms, ‘nature’ and ‘aesthetics’, were variously interpreted, and the scientific community which was expected to pronounce on these matters was itself divided. Indeed, anthropological scientists could not agree on what nature, and particularly human nature, was. Did all the different forms of mankind which they had discovered constitute human nature? Individual views on this issue depended on differing theories of race. The two main positions might be called the unitary and the pluralist views of human nature. The unitary view claimed that there was a single norm in nature and that any variation from it meant deformity and degeneration.1 a pathological condition. The pluralist view was that man displayed a variety of equally ‘natural’ types.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Athena S. Leoussi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leoussi, A.S. (1998). Hellenism and Ethnographic Art. In: Nationalism and Classicism. University of Reading European and International Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372689_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372689_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40139-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37268-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)