Skip to main content
  • 253 Accesses

Abstract

The basic mechanism of deterrence is psychological, that is the threat that ‘creates’ in an opponent ‘fear, anxiety, doubt’ — ‘although you can hurt us terribly, if you do we will pay you back by hurting you worse.’1 Deterrence was by no means a new concept to postwar American policy makers and strategists. Franklin Roosevelt told his close advisers at a White House meeting on 14 November 1938 that the expansion of American air power would deter Hitler and Japan. The president was well aware of the advantages of utilising the concept of deterrence as a means of furthering his foreign policy goals.2 Similarly, the United States Army Air Department spelled out the strategic role of air power on 15 September 1939: ‘the only reasonable hope of avoiding air attack is in the possession of such power of retaliation as to deter an enemy from initiating air warfare.’3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Donald Snow, Nuclear Strategy in a Dynamic World (Alabama: The University of Alabama Press, 1981), pp. 23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an excellent study of deterrence, see Glenn Snyder, Deterrence and Defense (Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1961), ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For FDR’s view, see Michael Sherry, The Rise of American Air Power (NY: Yale University Press, 1987), pp. 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Frank Futrell, Ideas, Concepts, Doctrine: Basic Thinking in the United States Air Force 1907–1960, vol. 1 (Alabama: Air University Press, 1989), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Graebner, ‘The Source of Postwar Insecurity’, p. 3; see also Robert H. Ferrell (ed.), The Diary of James C. Hagerty — Eisenhower in Mid Course, 1954–1955 (Blommington: Indiana University Press, 1983), p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Rosenberg, ‘The Origins of Overkill’ in Graebner (ed), National Security pp. 131–8 and for fuller accounts on the despatch of B-29s, see Avi Shlaim, The United States and the Berlin Blockade 1948–1949: A Study in Crisis Decision-Making (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1989) pp. 195–270.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For Truman’s atomic strategy, see Gregg Herken, The Winning Weapon — The Atomic Bomb in the Cold War, 1945–1950 (NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1980), esp. chs 10–15 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harry R. Borowski, A Hollow Threat — Strategic Air Power and Containment Before Korea (Westport, Conn. and London: Greenwood Press, 1982), pp. 32–3, 131–2, 137–8, 149–55; Rosenberg, ‘The Origins of Overkill’ pp. 135–6;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas M. Coffey, Iron Eagle — The Turbulent Life of General Curtis LeMay (NY: Avon Books, 1986), p. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paul Boyer, ‘“Some Sort of Peace”: President Truman, the American people, and the atomic bomb’, in Lacey (ed.), The Truman Presidency, pp. 174–202; see also Pollard, ‘The national security state reconsidered’, p. 219; Robert Donovan, Tumultuous Years: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman 1949–53 (New York and London: W.W. Norton and Company, 1982), pp. 152–5;

    Google Scholar 

  11. William Pemberton, Harry S. Truman: Fair Dealer & Cold Warrior (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1989), p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Condit, JCS History vol. 2, pp. 298, 294–98 ff; Steven Ross, American War Plans 1945–1950 (NY and London: Garland Publishing Inc., 1988), pp. 110–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steven Zaloga, Target America: The Soviet Union and the Strategic Arms Race, 1945–1964 (Novato, CA: Presidio, 1993), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  14. May (ed.), Interpreting NSC 68, p. 105; see also Jerald A. Combs, ‘The Compromise that Never Was: George Kennan, Paul Nitze, and the Issue of Conventional Deterrence in Europe, 1949–1952’ Diplomatic History 15:3 (summer 1991), pp. 361–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alec Nove, Stalinism and After (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1981), p. 133;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carl A. Linden, Khrushchev and the Soviet Leadership — with an epilogue on Gorbachev (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Evolution of Foreign Policy’, Department of State Bulletin, 30 25 January 1954, pp. 107–10 in Trachtenberg (ed.), The Basic Documents, pp. 279–84. See also, ‘Deterrent Strategy’, Box 80, Dulles papers, SML; Townsend Hoopes, The Devil and John Foster Dulles (London: Andre Deutsch, 1974), pp. 127, 198–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sloan, Eisenhower, p. 75; Richard A. Aliano, American Defense Policy from Eisenhower to Kennedy: The Politics of Changing Military Requirements, 1957–1961 (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1975), pp. 36–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brian Bond, Liddell Hart — A Study of his Military Thought (London: Cassell, 1977), p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenberg, ‘The Origins of Overkill’, pp. 145–6; see also Bernard Brodie, ‘A Commentary on the Preventive War Doctrine’ 11 June 1953 [RAND Internal Working Document] in Marc Trachtenberg (ed.), The Development of American Strategic Thought: Writings on Strategy 1952–1960, vol. 1 (NY and London: Garland Publishing Inc., 1988), p. 133;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Russell D. Buhite and W.M. Christopher Hamel, ‘War for Peace: The Question of an American Preventive War against the Soviet Union, 1945–1955’, Diplomatic History 14:3 (summer 1990), pp. 367–84; Trachtenberg, ‘Wasting Asset’, pp. 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Laurence Martin, Arms and Strategy (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1973), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  23. William Kaufman, ‘The Requirements of Deterrence’, in W. Kaufman (ed.), Military Policy and National Security (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956) in Trachtenberg (ed.), Strategic Thought, vol. 2, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Provision 11, NSC 5602/1, 15 March 1956, FRUS 1955–7, vol. 19, p. 246; see also David Rosenberg, ‘“A Smoking Radiating Ruin at the End of Two Hours”: Documents on American Plans for Nuclear War with the Soviet Union, 1954–1955’, International Security 6:3 (winter 1981/2), pp. 13–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henry Cabot Lodge, As It Was: An Inside View of Politics and Power in the ’50s and ’60s (New York: W.W. Norton, 1976), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Saki Dockrill

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dockrill, S. (1996). The ‘New Look’ in Nuclear Deterrence Strategy. In: Eisenhower’s New-Look National Security Policy, 1953–61. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372337_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372337_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39735-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37233-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics