Skip to main content

Introduction: Understanding the Digital Humanities

  • Chapter

Abstract

Across the university the way in which we pursue research is changing, and digital technology is playing a significant part in that change. Indeed, it is becoming more and more evident that research is increasingly being mediated through digital technology. Many argue that this mediation is slowly beginning to change what it means to undertake research, affecting both the epistemologies and ontologies that underlie a research programme (sometimes conceptualised as ‘close’ versus ‘distant’reading, see Moretti 2000???). Of course,this development is variable depending on disciplines and research agendas,with some more reliant on digital technology than others, but it is rare to find an academic today who has had no access to digital technology as part of their research activity. Library catalogues are now probably the minimum way in which an academic can access books and research articles without the use of a computer, but, with card indexes dying a slow and certain death (Baker 1996: 2001), there remain few outputs for the non-digital scholar to undertake research in the modern university. Email, Google searches and bibliographic databases are become increasingly crucial, as more of the world libraries are scanned and placed online.

Keywords

  • Digital Technology
  • Cultural Object
  • Sociological Imagination
  • Computational Device
  • Cultural Criticism

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/9780230371934_1
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-230-37193-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Arnold, M. (2009), Culture and Anarchy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N. (1996), The Size of Thoughts: Essays and Other Lumber (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N. (2001), Double Fold: Libraries and the Assault on Paper (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, C. (2008), Supermedia: Saving Journalism So It Can Save the World. (London: Wiley-Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1992), ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, in Illuminations, trans. H. Zohn (London: Fontana, 245–55).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. M. (2008), Copy, Rip, Burn: The Politics of Copyleft and Open Source (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. M. (2011), The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, T., Steger, S., Unsworth, J. and Uszkalo, K. (2008), ‘How Not to Read a Million Books’, accessed 21 June 2010. http://www3.isrl.illinois.edu/~unsworth/hownot2read.html#sdendnote4sym

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinamen (2011), The Procedural Rhetorics of the Obama Campaign, retrieved 15 January

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, J. (2009), ‘The Productive Unease of 21st-Century Digital Scholarship’, Digital Humanities Quarterly, Summer 2009, 3/3, retrieved 10 October 2010. http://digitalhumanities. org/dhq/vol/3/3/000055/000055.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M. (2006), ‘Software Studies Workshop’, accessed 13 April 2010. http://pzwart. wdka.hro.nl/mdr/Seminars2/softstudworkshop

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M. (2008), Software Studies: A Lexicon (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2006), The New Sociological Imagination (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2010), ‘Humanity: The Always Already – or Never to Be – Object of the Social Sciences?’, in J. W. Bouwel (ed.), The Social Sciences and Democracy (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (2012), ‘How We Think: Transforming Power and Digital Technologies’, in D. M. Berry (ed.), Understanding the Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993), ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, in D. F. Krell (ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings (London:Routledge, 311–41).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. (1963), Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (New York: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • JAH (2008), ‘Interchange: The Promise of Digital History’, The Journal of American History, retrieved 12 December 2010. http://www.journalofamericanhistory.org/issues/952/interchange/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, M. (2009), ‘Hello Worlds’, The Chronicle of Higher Education, accessed 10 December 2010. http://chronicle.com/article/Hello-Worlds/5476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1980), Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986), ‘Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’, Knowledge and Society, vol. 6, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2010), ‘Tarde’s Idea of Quantification’, in M. Candea (ed.), The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, D. et al. (2009), ‘Computational Social Science’, Science 323/5915 (6 February): 721–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1999), Collective Intelligence (London: Perseus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu. A. (2003), ‘The Humanities: A Technical Profession’, retrieved 15 December 2010. http://www.english.ucsb.edu/faculty/ayliu/research/talks/2003mla/liu_talk.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. (2011), ‘Where is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities?’, accessed 15 December 2011. http://liu.english.ucsb.edu/where-is-cultural-criticism-in-the-digital-humanities/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2008), Software Takes Command, accessed 3 May 2010. http://lab.software studies.com/2008/11/softbook.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. and Douglas, J. (2009), ‘Visualizing Temporal Patterns in Visual Media:Computer Graphics as a Research Method’, accessed 10 October 2009. http://softwarestudies.com/cultural_analytics/visualizing_temporal_patterns.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, W. (2009), ‘Attending from and to the Machine’, accessed 18 September 2010.http://staff.cch.kcl.ac.uk/~wmccarty/essays/McCarty,%20Inaugural.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montfort, N. (2004), ‘Continuous Paper: The Early Materiality and Workings of Electronic Literature’, retrieved 16 January 2011. http://nickm.com/writing/essays/continuous_paper_mla.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montfort, N. and Bogost, I. (2009), Racing the Beam: The Atari Video Computer System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, F. (2000), ‘Conjectures on World Literature’, retrieved 20 October 2010. http://www.newleftreview.org/A2094

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, F. (2007), Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History (London:Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature (2007), ‘A matter of trust’, Nature 449/(11 October): 637–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. H. (1996), The Idea of a University (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Presner, T. (2010), ‘Digital Humanities 2.0: A Report on Knowledge’, accessed 15 October 2010. http://cnx.org/content/m34246/1.6/?format=pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, S. (2011), ‘On Building’, retrieved 15 January 2011. http://lenz.unl.edu/wordpress/?p=340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Readings, B. (1996), The University in Ruins (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1945), ‘Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 46 (1945–1946): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, M. (2011), ‘Criminal Code: The Procedural Logic of Crime in Videogames’, retrieved 15 January 2011. http://www.samplereality.com/2011/01/14/criminal-codethe-procedural-logic-of-crime-in-videogames/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnapp, J. and Presner, P. (2009), ‘Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0’, accessed 14 October 2010. http://www.humanitiesblast.com/manifesto/Manifesto_V2.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreibman, S., Siemans, R. and Unsworth, J. (2008), A Companion to Digital Humanities (London: Wiley-Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1962), ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man’, in R. Colodny (ed.),Frontiers of Science and Philosophy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 35–78).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, B. (2010), ‘Atemporality for the Creative Artist’, Wired, accessed 1 July 2010.http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2010/02/atemporality-for-the-creativeartist/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickney, D. (2008), ‘Charticle Fever’, American Journalism Review, accessed 18 March 2010http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4608

    Google Scholar 

  • Terras, M. (2010), ‘Present, Not Voting: Digital Humanities in the Panopticon’, accessed 10 July 2010. http://melissaterras.blogspot.com/2010/07/dh2010-plenary-present-notvoting.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. (2003), ‘Heidegger and the Politics of the University’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 41/4: 515–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. (2009), ‘Understanding Technology Ontotheologically, Or: the Danger and the Promise of Heidegger, an American Perspective’, in Olsen, J. K. B, Selinger, E., and Riis, S. (eds), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M. (1950), ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind Oct. 1950:433–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 David M. Berry

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berry, D.M. (2012). Introduction: Understanding the Digital Humanities. In: Berry, D.M. (eds) Understanding Digital Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371934_1

Download citation