Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modes of Knowing in Practice: The Relationship between Knowledge and Learning Revisited

  • Chapter
The Future of Knowledge Management

Abstract

The emphasis placed in recent years on knowledge and learning as the new sources of wealth (Badaracco, 1991; Drucker, 1993; Sveiby, 1997; Boisot, 1998) has led to a preoccupation with ways in which knowledge and learning can be ‘managed’ so that their contribution to organizational performance can be best predicted and achieved. This preoccupation has resulted in knowledge and learning’s being treated like entities to be manipulated at will. Moreover, as a result of this preoccupation, the attention has shifted more towards the outcome of learning and knowledge, away from the process of learning and knowing itself. The ongoing challenge in knowledge management debates remains the need to identify ways we can better understand the dynamic nature of knowing in action. Although practice-based approaches (Bourdieu, 1980; Orlikowski, 1992; Turner, 1994; Gherardi, 2000) have enabled us to capture some of the forces which shape the nature of knowing, we have yet to fully understand how knowing is put into practice. This chapter contributes to this debate and argues that a better understanding of the relationship between learning and knowledge can provide valuable insights into knowing in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (1996) ‘A Study of Interrelationships: The Way Individual Managers Learn And adapt and the Contribution of Training towards this Process’, unpublished PhD thesis, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (1998) ‘Developing Learning Managers within Learning Organizations’, in M. Easterby-Smith, L. Araujo and J. Burgoyne (eds), Organizational Learning: Developments in Theory and Practice (London: Sage), pp. 214–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (1999a) ‘Individuals’ Responses to Change: The Relationship between Learning and Knowledge’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 8 (2) 130–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (1999b) ‘Training does not imply Learning: The Individual’s Perspective’, International Journal of Training and Development, 3 (1), 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2000) ‘Reconnecting Education, Training and Development through Learning: A Holographic Perspective’, Education + Training, special issue on ‘Vocational Education and Training in SMEs’, 42(4/5), 255–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2001) ‘The Paradoxical Nature of the Relationship between Learning and Training’, Journal of Management Studies, 38 (3), 327–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2005) ‘The Relationship between Individual and Organizational Learning: New Evidence from Managerial Learning Practices’, Management Learning, under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1982), Reasoning, Learning and Action, USA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. and D. A. Schön (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory in Action Perspective (Reading, MA: Addisson Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, J. L. (1991) The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances, (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. and J. A. Vaughan (1969) Training in Industry: The Management of Learning, 2nd edn (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (1993) ‘Knowledge and the Theory of Organizations: Organizations as Activity Systems and the Reframing of Management’, Journal of Management Studies, 30, 863–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (1995) ‘Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation’, Organisation Studies, 16 (6), 1021–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. (1998), Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R. J. and Tenkasi, R. V. (1995), “Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing,” Organization Science, 6, 4, 350–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980) The Logic of Practice (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and P. Duguid (1991) ‘Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Towards a Unifying View of Working, Learning, and Innovation’, Organization Science, 2 (1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappon, A. (1994) ‘A Life-Cycle View of Banking’, Journal of Retail Banking, 16 (1), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, C. W. (1998) The Knowing Organisation: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge and Make Decisions, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N. and J. S. Brown (1999) ‘Bridging epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing’, Organization Science 10 (4), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson-Thomas, C. J. (1997) ‘The Future of the Organisation: Selected Knowledge Management Issues’, The Journal of Knowledge Management, 1 (1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. and L. Prusak (1998) Working Knowledge, (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1993) Post-Capitalist Society, (London: Butterworth-Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1993) ‘Work as a Testbed of Activity Theory’, in S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (Eds), Understanding practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), PP. 64–103.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiddis, C. (1998) Managing Knowledge in the Supply Chain: The Key to Competitive Advantage (London: Financial Times Retail and Consumer Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1983) The Conditions of Learning, 3rd edn (New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A. (1993) ‘Building a Learning Organisation’, Harvard Business Review, July/August, 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (1999) ‘Learning as Problem-Driven or Learning in the Face of Mystery?’, Organisation Studies, 20 (1), 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2000) ‘Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations’, Organization, 7 (2), 211–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. and C. W. Allinson (1988) ‘Cultural Differences in the Learning Styles of Managers’, Management International Review, 28 (3), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergenhahn, B. R. (1982) An Introduction to Theories of Learning, 2nd ed, (London: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Juch, B. (1983) Personal Development Theory and Practice in Management Training, (Chichester: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. H. (1993) ‘The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning’, Sloan Management Review, Fall, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, L. A., R. G. Murdick and F. E. Schuster (1985) Human Resource Management, (Florida: Bell and Howell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A., S. Lublin J. Spoth and R. Baker (1991) ‘Strategic Management Development: Experiential Learning and Managerial Competencies’, in J. Henry and D. Walker (eds), Creative Management (London: Sage and The Open University), pp. 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1993) ‘The Practice of Learning’, in S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (eds), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1962) The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the US, (New York: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) ‘The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations’, Organization Science, 3 (3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension, (New York: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. (1971) Developing Effective Managers: A New Approach to Business, (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, I. (1998) ‘Individual and Organizational Learning at the Executive Level’, Management Learning, 29 (3), 299–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryles, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson … Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997) ‘The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets (San Francisco: Berret Koehler Inc).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. F. and E. S. Harri-Augstein (1985) Self-Organised Learning: Foundation of a Conversational Science for Psychology (London: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1994) The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presupposition (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Venzin, M., von G. Krogh and J. Roos (1998) ‘Future Research into Knowledge Management’, in G. von Krogh, J. Roos and D. Kleine (eds), Knowing in Firms: Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge (London: Sage), pp. 26–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G., J. Roos and D. Kleine (1998), Knowing in Firms: Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge (London: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1975) Learning and Reinforcement (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzlawick, P., J. H. Weakland and R. Fish (1974) Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zande, U. and B. Kogut (1995) ‘Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test’, Organization Science, 6 (1), 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Elena P. Antonacopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Innsbruck University School of Management, Austria

    Birgit Renzl (Assistant Professor) (Assistant Professor)

  2. Department of International Management, University of Linz, Austria

    Kurt Matzler (Professor and Chair) (Professor and Chair)

  3. Department of Management, University of Innsbruck, Austria

    Hans Hinterhuber (Professor of Strategic Management and Head) (Professor of Strategic Management and Head)

Copyright information

© 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2006). Modes of Knowing in Practice: The Relationship between Knowledge and Learning Revisited. In: Renzl, B., Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. (eds) The Future of Knowledge Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371897_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation