Abstract
Republicanism and liberalism first diverged when some “liberals” (formerly republicans) accepted the shackles of autocratic power. Liberalism asserted the value of being left alone, even at the price of accepting an “enlightened” despot. This liberal policy of avoiding conflict seemed very appealing in an era when public controversies cost many subjects their lives. Liberalism began as a retreat to the private sphere, and grew by expanding the private to incorporate more and more formerly public functions. So liberalism started as a flight from politics, embracing a new definition of liberty as the ability to do what one wants, in one’s own way. This definition has political implications, and gradually a new political science of liberalism emerged, reflecting liberalism’s new conception of “liberty.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
See Sellers, “Republican Impartiality” in 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 273 (1991).
E.g., John Stuart Mill “On Liberty” in J.S. Mill On Liberty and Other Writings, ed. Stefan Collini (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 8–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 M.N.S. Sellers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sellers, M.N.S. (1998). Political Liberalism. In: The Sacred Fire of Liberty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371811_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371811_31
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40604-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37181-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)