Advertisement

An ‘Intimate Commerce with Figures’: On Rereading/Rewriting Narratives

Chapter
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In a 24 October 1895 Notebook entry, Henry James reviewed his ideas for a story on the struggle of literary critics with ‘the Author’s Secret’. Interestingly, this note rehearses the plot of what would become ‘The Figure in the Carpet’ not in the author’s ‘proper identity’, but from the perspective of an unnamed narrator-critic, punctuating the rich comic-rhetorical resources of this shifted focus:

Keywords

Literary Criticism Literary Text Critical Rewrite Textual Production Critical Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    André Lefevere, ‘Why Waste Our Time on Rewrites? The Trouble with Interpretation and the Role of Rewriting in an Alternative Paradigm’, in The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation, ed. Theo Hermans (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985), p. 216.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Samuel Weber, Institution and Interpretation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), p. 37.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Northrop Frye, ‘The Survival of Eros in Poetry’, in Romanticism and Contemporary Criticism, eds. Morris Eaves and Michael Fischer (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 33.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See E.D. Hirsch, Jr., The Aims of Interpretation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 18.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stanley Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980), p. 369.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    David Birch, Language, Literature and Critical Practice: Ways of Analysing Text (London and New York: Routledge, 1989), p. 21.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Harold Bloom, ‘The Breaking of Form’, in Bloom et al., Deconstruction and Criticism (New York: Seabury, 1979), p. 8.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Jonathan Culler, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981), p. 12.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    E.D. Hirsch, ‘The Politics of Theories of Interpretation’, Critical Inquiry, 9 (1982): 246.nGoogle Scholar
  10. 11.
    William E. Cain, The Crisis in Criticism: Theory, Literature, and Reform in English Studies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984), p. 7.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Jacques Derrida, Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1978), p. 427.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    K.M. Newton, In Defense of Literary Interpretation: Theory and Practice (London: Macmillan, 1986), p. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.
    Edward Said, ‘Travelling Theory’, Raritan, 1 (1982): 59.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Paul de Man, The Resistance to Theory, foreword Wlad Godzich (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986), p. 7.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Wayne Booth, ‘Reversing the Downward Spiral: Or, What is the Graduate Program For?’, Profession 1987: 37–8.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    See Wayne C. Booth, ‘Pluralism in the Classroom’, Critical Inquiry, 1 (1986): 476.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Geoffrey H. Hartman, Criticism in the Wilderness: The Study of Literature Today (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980), pp. 7–9, 296.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Christopher Ricks, ‘Theory and Teaching’, in Critical Theory and the Teaching of Literature: Proceedings of the Northeastern University Center for Literary Studies, ed. Stuart Peterfreund (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1985), vol. 3, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    Walter Benn Michaels, ‘The Interpreter’s Self: Peirce on the Cartesian “Subject”’, Georgia Review 31 (1977): 383–402.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Repr. in Jane P. Tompkins, ed., Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980), pp. 186–7.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    Susanne Kappeler, Writing and Reading in Henry James (London: Macmillan, 1980), pp. 44, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 25.
    Marjorie Nicholson, ‘The Professor and the Detective’ (1929), in The Art of the Mystery Story, ed. Howard Haycraft (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1946), p. 126.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    Erika Fischer-Lichte, ‘The Quest for Meaning’, Stanford Literary Review, 1 (1986): 137, 141.Google Scholar
  24. 30.
    Michael Riffaterre, Semiotics of Poetry (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978/1984), p. 166.Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    William R. Schroeder, ‘A Teachable Theory of Interpretation’, in Theory in the Classroom, ed. Cary Nelson (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1986), p. 19.Google Scholar
  26. 32.
    In Paul Ricoeur’s synthetic definition, ‘hermeneutics is the theory of the operations of understanding in their relation to the interpretations of texts.’ Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, ed. John B. Thompson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 8.Google Scholar
  27. 35.
    Deirdre Burton, ‘Through Glass Darkly: Through Dark Glasses’, in R.A. Carter, ed., Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics (London: Allen & Unwin, 1982), p. 196.Google Scholar
  28. 36.
    Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981), p. 35.Google Scholar
  29. 41.
    André Lefevere, ‘On the Refraction of Texts’, in Mimesis in Contemporary Theory, vol. 1, The Literary and Philosophical Debate, ed. Mihai Spariosu (Philadelphia: John Benjamins Press, 1984), pp. 215–43.Google Scholar
  30. 42.
    Wolfgang Iser, Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), pp. 7, 4.Google Scholar
  31. 43.
    Paul de Man, Allegories of Reading (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), p. 205.Google Scholar
  32. 44.
    David Lodge, The Novelist at the Crossroads and Other Essays on Fiction and Criticism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971), p. 58.Google Scholar
  33. 45.
    Horst Ruthrof, The Reader’s Construction of Narrative (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981), pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
  34. 46.
    Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985), pp. 127–8.Google Scholar
  35. 47.
    Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982), p. 72.Google Scholar
  36. 49.
    Michael Steig, Stories of Reading: Subjectivity and Literary Understanding (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), pp. 12, 14.Google Scholar
  37. 50.
    Mary Jacobus, Reading Woman: Essays in Feminist Criticism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), p. 11.Google Scholar
  38. 52.
    Jacques Derrida, ‘LIVING ON: Border Lines’, trans. James Hulbert, in Deconstruction and Criticism, ed. Harold Bloom et al. (New York: Seabury, 1979), p. 100.Google Scholar
  39. 53.
    Inge Crosman Wimmers, Poetics of Reading: Approaches to the Novel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988), p. xx.Google Scholar
  40. 55.
    Thomas M. Leitch, ‘For (Against) a Theory of Rereading’, Modern Fiction Studies 33/3 (Autumn 1987): 501.Google Scholar
  41. 56.
    Dieter Richter, ‘Teachers and Readers: Reading Attitudes as a Problem in Teaching Literature’, trans. Sarah Lennox, New German Critique, 7 (1976): 31.Google Scholar
  42. 57.
    Peter Uwe Hohendhal, The Institution of Criticism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982), pp. 184, 187.Google Scholar
  43. 59.
    Frank Lentricchia, ‘On Behalf of Theory’, in Criticism in the University, ed. Gerald Graff and Reginald Gibbons (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1985), p. 108.Google Scholar
  44. 60.
    Richard Rorty, ‘Philosophy Without Principles’, Critical Inquiry 3 (1985).Google Scholar
  45. 60.
    Repr. in Against Theory: Literary Studies and the New Pragmatism, ed. W.J.T. Mitchell (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), p. 134.Google Scholar
  46. 64.
    J. Hillis Miller, The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man, Eliot, Trollope, James, and Benjamin (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), p. 43.Google Scholar
  47. 66.
    Wolfgang Iser, The Act of Reading (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978/1981), p. 58.Google Scholar
  48. 67.
    Paul Ricoeur, ‘Qu’est-ce qu’un texte’, in Rüdiger Bubner, ed., Hermeneutik und Dialektik: Festschrift in Honor of H.G. Gadamer (Tübingen: Mohr, 1970), pp. 194–5 (trans. Inge Crosman Wimmers).Google Scholar
  49. 71.
    Michael Riffaterre, Semiotics of Poetry (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978), pp. 81 et passim.Google Scholar
  50. 72.
    Michael Riffaterre, ‘The Interpretant in Literary Semiotics’, Journal of Semiotics, 3/4 (1985): 41–2.Google Scholar
  51. 74.
    Northrop Frye, The Critical Path (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1971), pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
  52. 75.
    Umberto Eco, A Theory of Semiotics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976), p. 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 76.
    François Roustang, ‘On Reading Again’, in The Limits of Theory, ed. Thomas M. Kavanagh (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), p. 127.Google Scholar
  54. 79.
    Paul de Man, Introduction to Hans Robert Jauss, Toward an Aesthetic of Reception (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982); repr. as ‘Reading and History’, The Resistance to Theory, p. 58.Google Scholar
  55. 80.
    Pierre Macherey, A Theory of Literary Production, trans. Geoffrey Wall (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978), p. 96.Google Scholar
  56. 85.
    M.A.K. Halliday, ‘The Teacher Taught the Students English: An Essay in Applied Linguistics’, in The Second LACUS Forum, ed. P.A. Reich (Columbia: Hornbeam Press, 1976), pp. 344–9.Google Scholar
  57. 86.
    Roland Barthes, ‘Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives’, in A Barthes Reader, ed. Susan Sontag (New York: Hill and Wang, 1982), p. 295.Google Scholar
  58. 87.
    Annette Kolodny, ‘Dancing Through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Practice, and Politics of a Feminist Literary Criticism’, in Feminist Studies, 6 (1980): 11.Google Scholar
  59. 88.
    Kaja Silverman, The Subject of Semiotics (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 85.Google Scholar
  60. 89.
    Hans Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (New York: Seabury Press, 1975), p. 264.Google Scholar
  61. 91.
    Peter Brooks, Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative (New York: Vintage Books, 1984), p. 37.Google Scholar
  62. 93.
    Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, trans. and ed. James Strachey (London: Hogarth Press, 1955), vol. 28, pp. 10, 16–17, 35.Google Scholar
  63. 95.
    Roland Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975), p. 14.Google Scholar
  64. 101.
    Hans Robert Jauss, Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics, trans. Michael Shaw (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), pp. 32, 160.Google Scholar
  65. 102.
    Teresa de Lauretis, ‘Strategies of Coherence’, in Reading Narrative: Form, Ethics, Ideology, ed. James Phelan (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1988), p. 201.Google Scholar
  66. 105.
    Julia Kristeva, ‘Psychoanalysis and the Polis’, trans. M. Waller, in W.J.T. Mitchell, ed., The Politics of Interpretation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983): 84.Google Scholar
  67. 106.
    Michel Foucault, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. Donald F. Bouchard (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), p. 202.Google Scholar
  68. 109.
    Cynthia Chase, Decomposing Figures: Rhetorical Readings in the Romantic Tradition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), p. 148.Google Scholar
  69. 111.
    Allon White, The Uses of Obscurity: The Fiction of Early Modernism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981), p. 249.Google Scholar
  70. 112.
    Jacques Derrida, La Carte postale (Paris: Flammarion, 1980), p. 432.Google Scholar
  71. 113.
    Tzvetan Todorov, ‘The Secret of Narrative’, The Poetics of Prose, trans. Richard Howard (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), p. 177.Google Scholar
  72. 113.
    Originally published as ‘The Structural Analysis of Literature: the Tales of Henry James’, in Structuralism: an Introduction, ed. D. Robey (Oxford: Claredon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  73. 115.
    Norman N. Holland, The Dynamics of Literary Response (New York: W.W. Norton, 1975), p. 179.Google Scholar
  74. 116.
    Donna Przybylowicz, Desire and Repression: The Dialectic of Self and Other in the Late Works of Henry James (University: University of Alabama Press, 1986), p. 6.Google Scholar
  75. 117.
    Ellen Messer-Davidow,‘The Philosophic Bases of Feminist Criticism’, NLH 19/1 (Autumn 1987): 73.Google Scholar
  76. 118.
    Donn Schumacher, ‘Subjectivities: A Theory of Critical Process’, in Feminist Literary Criticism: Explorations in Theory, ed. Josephine Donovan (Lexington: University of Kentucky, 1975), p. 34.Google Scholar
  77. 121.
    J. Hillis Miller, ‘Stevens’ Rock and Criticism as Cure, II’, Georgia Review, 30 (1976): 337, 341.Google Scholar
  78. 122.
    Michel Foucault, Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), p. 602.Google Scholar
  79. 123.
    Terry Eagleton, Walter Benjamin, or Towards a Revolutionary Criticism (London: Verso and NLB, 1981), pp. 137–8.Google Scholar
  80. 124.
    Nancy R. Comley, ‘Composing, Uniting, Transacting: Whys and Ways of Connecting Reading and Writing’, College English, 51/2 (February 1989): 193.Google Scholar
  81. 125.
    David Bartholomae, ‘Reading, Writing, Interpreting’, in Only Connect: Uniting Writing and Reading, ed. Thomas Newkirk (Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook, 1986), p. 119.Google Scholar
  82. 126.
    David Bleich, ‘Reading and Writing as Social Activities’, in Convergencies: Transactions in Reading and Writing, ed. Bruce T. Petersen Urbana: NCTE, 1986), p. 105.Google Scholar
  83. 127.
    Barbara Lounsberry, Editor’s Preface to Draftings in Literary Criticism: The New Journalism (Cedar Falls: University of Northern Iowa/Board of Student Publications, 1985), p. iv.Google Scholar
  84. 128.
    Barbara Lounsberry and Marcel Cornis-Pop, eds., Draftings in Reader-Oriented Criticism: Reweaving ‘The Figure in the Carpet’ (Cedar Falls: University of Northern Iowa/Board of Student Publications, 1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marcel Cornis-Pop 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUK

Personalised recommendations