Abstract
Plato is famous for having banished poetry and poets from the ideal city of the Republic. But he did no such thing. On the contrary, poetry — the right sort of poetry — will be a pervasive presence in the society he describes. Yes, he did banish Homer, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes — the greatest names of Greek literature. But not because they were poets. He banished them because they produced the wrong sort of poetry. To rebut Plato’s critique of poetry, what is needed is not a defence of poetry, but a defence of the freedom of poets to write as, and what, they wish.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Banville, J. (1997) The Untouchable (New York: Knopf).
Cavell, S. (1979) The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film, enlarged edn (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 M. F. Burnyeat
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burnyeat, M.F. (2012). Art and Mimesis in Plato’s Republic. In: Denham, A.E. (eds) Plato on Art and Beauty. Philosophers in Depth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368187_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368187_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33965-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36818-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)