Advertisement

From The Fire and the Sun: Why Plato Banished the Artists

  • Iris Murdoch
Part of the Philosophers in Depth book series (PID)

Abstract

To begin with, of course, Plato did not banish all the artists or always suggest banishing any. In a memorable passage in the Republic (III.398a) he says that should a dramatic poet attempt to visit the ideal state he would be politely escorted to the border. Elsewhere Plato is less polite, and in the Laws proposes a meticulous system of censorship. Scattered throughout his work, from the beginning to the end, there are harsh criticisms, and indeed sneers, directed against practitioners of the arts. This attitude is puzzling and seems to demand an explanation. However, what sounds like an interesting question may merit an uninteresting answer; and there are some fairly obvious answers to the question why Plato was so hostile to art. He speaks in the Republic of ‘an old quarrel between philosophy and poetry’ (X.607b). The poets had existed, as prophets and sages, long before the emergence of philosophers, and were the traditional purveyors of theological and cosmological information. Herodotus (ii.53) tells us that the Greeks knew little about the gods before Homer and Hesiod taught them; and Heraclitus (fr. 57) attacks Hesiod, whom he calls ‘the teacher of most men,’ as a rival authority. Also of course any political theorist who is particularly concerned about social stability (as Plato, like Hobbes, had good reason to be) is likely to consider the uses of censorship. Artists are meddlers, independent and irresponsible critics; literary genres affect societies (Rep. IV.424c) and new styles of architecture bring changes of heart.

Keywords

Early Dialogue Memorable Passage Sexual Love Erotic Dialogue Discipline Understanding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Auden, W. H. (1948) ‘Squares and Oblongs’ in Poets at Work: Essays Based on the Modern Poetry Collection at the Lockwood Memorial Library (New York: Harcourt, Brace).Google Scholar
  2. Bosanquet, B. (1904) A History of Aesthetic, 2nd edn (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  3. Cornford, F. M. (1957) From Religion to Philosophy: A Study in the Origins of Western Speculation (New York: Harper).Google Scholar
  4. de Lisle, F. (1904) Burne-Jones (London: Methuen and Co.).Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. (1981) ‘Plato’s Pharmacy’ in B. Johnson (trans.) Dissemination (London: Athlone Press).Google Scholar
  6. Dodds, E. R. (1951) The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley: University or California Press).Google Scholar
  7. Eliot, T. S. (1975) ‘The Metaphysical Poets’ in F. Kermode (ed.) Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).Google Scholar
  8. Ross, W. D. (1976) Plato’s Theory of Ideas (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press).Google Scholar
  9. Tolstoy, L. (1960) A. Maude (trans.) What is Art? (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill).Google Scholar
  10. Wind, E. (1958) Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Wittgenstein, L. (1968) G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.) Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  12. Wittgenstein, L. (1975) D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (trans.) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, rev. edn (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iris Murdoch 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iris Murdoch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations