Skip to main content

Embodied Technology as Implicit Background of Modern Civilization

  • Chapter
Knowing without Thinking

Part of the book series: New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science ((NDPCS))

  • 306 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge representation, which is today used in database applications, artificial intelligence (AI), software engineering, and many other disciplines of computer science has deep roots in logic and philosophy (Mainzer, 2003a, 2003b). In the beginning, there was Aristotle (384–322 B.C.) who developed logic as a precise method for reasoning about knowledge. Syllogisms were introduced as formal patterns for representing special figures of logical deductions. According to Aristotle, the subject of ontology is the study of categories of things that exist or may exist in some domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balke, W.-T. and K. Mainzer (2005) ‘Knowledge representation and the embodied mind: Towards a philosophy and technology of personalized informatics’, in Lecture Notes of Artificial Intelligence, 3782: Professional Knowledge Management (Berlin: Springer), 586–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1979) What Computer’s Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence (New York: Harper &Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983) The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (2004) ‘How and why brains create sensory information’, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 14, 515–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainzer, K. (2010) Leben als Maschine? Von derSystembiologie zur Robotik und Künstlichen IntelliAenz (Osnabrück: Mentis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainzer, K. (2007) Thinking in Complexity. The Computational Dynamics of Matter, Mind. and Mankind (New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainzer, K. (2005) Symmetry and Complexity: The Spirit and Beauty of Nonlinear Science (Singapore: World Scientific).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainzer, K. (2003a) Computerphilosophie Hamburg: Junius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainzer, K. (2003b) KI — Künstliche Intelligenz: Grundlagen intelligenter Systeme, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception (Routledge &Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, R. and C. Scheier (2001) Understanding Intelligence (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Klaus Mainzer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mainzer, K. (2012). Embodied Technology as Implicit Background of Modern Civilization. In: Radman, Z. (eds) Knowing without Thinking. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368064_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics