Abstract
The study of elites and elite theory has pervaded the literature of a number of different disciplines including sociology, anthropology, economics and others. Historically, there have been any number of reasons why one might be identified or considered to be a member of the elites. Being identified as an elite typically carried with it specific rights, rules and obligations. As such, there were implicit or explicit associations and judgements regarding the fitness of their decision-making and actions (Veblen, 1934). There were established expectations and responsibilities regarding their roles in political processes (Lippmann, 2008), as well as in concepts of philanthropy, a sense of duty within the concept of noblesse oblige (Skiffington, 1991) and within both ancient and contemporary regimes (Bottomore, 1993). Such breadth and depth of involvement helps justify why one might argue that elites and elite theory need reconsideration in our contemporary discourses and processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abel, C. F. and Sementelli, A. (2003) Evolutionary Critical Theory and its Role in Public Affairs (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe).
Abel, C. F. and Sementelli, A. (2007) Justice in Public Administration (Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press).
Baudrillard, J. (1998) The Consumer Society (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Baudrillard, J. (2000) Simulacra and Simulation (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
Berlant, L. (1993) ‘The Theory of Infantile Citizenship’, Public Culture, 5 (3): 395–410.
Boorstin, D. (1992) The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America (New York: Vintage).
Bottomore, T. (1993) Elites and Society (2nd edn.) (London: Routledge).
Box, R. (1998) Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21 st Century (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Chomsky, N. (2003) Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda (2nd edn.) (New York: Seven Stories Press).
Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene (New York: Oxford University Press).
Debord, G. (1967/1995) The Society of the Spectacle, trans. D. Nicholson-Smith (New York: Zone Books).
Edelman, M. (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Ewen, S. (1990) All Consuming Images: The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture (New York: Basic Books).
Fink, B. (1995) The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Gabler, N. (1995) Winchell: Gossip, Power, and the Culture of Celebrity (New York: Vintage).
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to Face Behavior (New York: Pantheon Books).
Herman, E. and Chomsky, N. (2002) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (New York: Pantheon Books).
Hofstadter, R. (1966) Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (New York: Vintage).
Jacoby, S. (2009) The Age of American Unreason (New York: Vintage).
Jennings, A. and Waller, W. (1994) ‘Evolutionary Economics and Cultural Hermeneutics: Veblen, Cultural Relativism, and Blind Drift’, Journal of Economic Issues, 28 (4): 997–1030.
King, C. and Stivers, C. (1998) Government is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-Government Era (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Knoedler, J., Prasch, R. and Champlin, D. (2007) Thorstein Veblen and the Revival of Free Market Capitalism (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar).
Lacan, J. (1996) Écrits, trans. B. Fink (New York: W. W. Norton).
Lippmann, W. (2008) The Phantom Public (New Brunswick, CT: Transaction Publishers).
Lyotard, J. (1999) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
Miller, H. (2002) Postmodern Public Policy (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).
Mills, C. (1956/2000) The Power Elite. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pareto, V. (1963) A Treatise on General Sociology (New York: Dover).
Skiffington, K. (1991) ‘Noblesse Oblige: A Strategy for Local Boundary Making’, Ethnology, 30 (3): 265–77.
Tilman, R. (1972) ‘Veblen’s Ideal Political Economy and its Critics’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 31 (3): 307–17.
Tilman, R. (1973) ‘Thorstein Veblen: Incrementalist and Utopian’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 32(2): 155–70.
Veblen, T. (1934) The Theory of the Leisure Class (New York: Random House).
Veblen, T. (1964) The Instinct of Workmanship (New York: Augustus Kelley).
Warhol photo exhibition, Stockholm, 1968: Kaplan, J. (ed.), Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations, 16th edn. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1992), 758: 17.
Zimmerman, J. and Ayoob, E. (2004) The Role of Products in Consumer–Celebrity Relationships. Human–Computer Interaction Institute, Paper 235 (http://repository.cmu.edu/hcii/235).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Arthur Sementelli
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sementelli, A. (2012). The Precession of Simulacra: Elites in the Post-Industrial Society. In: Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. (eds) Global Elites. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32655-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36240-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)