Skip to main content

Management Accounting Practices for Sustainability

  • Chapter

Abstract

With growing sensitivity towards social and environmental issues, modern businesses are increasingly under pressure to perform their business activities in an environmentally friendly manner. A widely accepted view among many different professionals and the general public is that companies — the key players in the modern global economy — are the entities which cause greatest damage to our ecological sustainability (Ball et al., 2009). Global warming, ozone depletion, deforestation, acid rain and toxic wastes are examples of ecological damage caused by corporations (Shrivastava, 1995). Governments and regulatory bodies across the world are tightening the relevant rules and regulations in an attempt to coerce companies towards becoming socially responsible and to pay greater attention to the environmental and social impact of their corporate actions. In this context, companies are compelled to look for the means that enable them to run their businesses in a socially and environmentally sustainable manner. However, they face the challenge of achieving this objective without sacrificing their economic well-being and performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, C. A. (2004). ‘The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting — Performance Portrayal Gap’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 17 (5), 731–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. A. and Frost, G. (2008). ‘Integrating Sustainability Reporting into Management Practices’, Accounting Forum, 32 (4), 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E. and Hughes, I. I. (2004). ‘The Relations Among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equation Approach’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 (5–6), 447–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, A., Masom, I., Miler, B. and Milne, M. (2009). ‘Carbon Neutrality: A Management Control Strategy for Climate Change or Modern-day Hocus-Pocus?’, AFAANZ Conference, Adelaide, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomeo, M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J. J., Heydkamp, P., James, P. and Wolters, T. (2000). ‘Environmental Management Accounting in Europe: Current Practice and Future Potential’, European Accounting Review, 9 (1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belal, A. R. (2002). ‘Stakeholder Accountability or Stakeholder Management? A Review of UK Firms’ Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting (SEAAR) Practices’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9 (1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. L. and Saka, C. (2006). ‘Environmental Management Accounting Applications and Eco-Efficiency: Case studies from Japan’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (14), 1262–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R. D. and Hansen, D. R. (2008). ‘Eco-efficiency: Defining A Role for Environmental Cost Management’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (6), 551–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Disclosure Project (2009). Carbon Disclosure Project Report 2009, Australia and New Zealand. Available at: https://www.cdproject.net/CDPResults/CDP_2009_Australia_New_Zealand_Report.pdf (retrieved November 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocca, P. and Alberti, M. (2004). ‘A Framework to Assess Performance Measurement Systems in SMEs’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59 (2), 186–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., Magnan, M. and Velthoven, B. V. (2005). ‘Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions?’, European Accounting Review, 14 (1), 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W. and Steiner, R. (2007). ‘The Mediating Role of EMS Teamwork as it Pertains to HR Factors and Perceived Environmental Performance’, Journal of Applied Business Research, 23 (1), 110–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dammak, S. (2009). ‘Contribution on the Analysis of the Environmental Disclosure: A Comparative Study of American and European Multinationals’, Social Responsibility Journal, 5, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate, Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts, Greenleaf Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethical Corporation (2010). ‘Nike Develops A ‘Balanced Scorecard’ for Ethics Integration’, at http://www.ethicalcorp.com/content.asp?ContentID=3117 (retrieved July 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2002). ‘The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard — Linking Sustainability Management to Business Strategy’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 11 (5), 269–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H. and Milne, M. (2002). ‘Sustainability Reporting: Who’s Kidding Whom?’, Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, J. F. and Journeault, M. (2010). ‘Eco-control: The Influence of Management Control Systems on Environmental and Economic Performance’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35 (1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2003). ‘Trends in Sustainability Reporting by The Fortune Global 250, Business Strategy and the Environment, 12 (5), 279–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar, S. and Cohen, A. (2001). ‘Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (2), 281–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langfield-Smith, K. and Thorne, H. (2009). Management Accounting, Information for Creating and Managing Value, McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. and Roberts, R. W. (2007). ‘Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance and Institutional Ownership in Canadian Firms, Accounting Forum, 31 (3), 233–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massoud, J. A., Daily, B. F. and Bishop, J. W. (2008). ‘Reward for Environmental Performance: Using the Scanlon Plan as Catalyst to Green Organisations’, Int. J. Environment, Workplace and Employment, 4 (1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J. (1996). ‘On Sustainability, the Environment and Management Accounting, Management Accounting Research, 7 (1), 135–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao, Y., Amano, A., Matsumura, K., Genba, K. and Nakano, M. (2007). ‘Relationship between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Corporations, Business Strategy and the Environment, 16 (2), 106–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagan, B. and Prasad, P. (2007). ‘The Queensland Food Eco-efficiency Project; Reducing Risk and Improving Competitiveness’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (8–9), 764–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego, P. and Hartmann, F. (2009). ‘Aligning Performance Measurement Systems with Strategy: The Case of Environmental Strategy’, ABACUS, 45 (4), 397–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, E. A., Ruiz, C. C. and Fenech, F. C. (2007). ‘Environmental Management Systems As An Embedding Mechanism: A Research Note’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20 (3), 403–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). ‘The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability’, Academy of Management Review, 20, 930–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkin, C., Wright, C. J. and Burnett, R. D. (2008). ‘Eco-efficiency and Firm Value’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 167–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shell (2009). Sustainability Report. Available at http://sustainabilityreport.shell.com/2009/servicepages/downloads/files/all_shell_sr09.pdf (retrieved July 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watercare Service Ltd, New Zealand (2009). Annual Report, available at http://www.watercare.co.nz/watercare/publications/annual-report-2009_home.cfm (retrieved July 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westpac Australia (2009). Annual Report, available at http://www.westpac.com. au/about-westpac/investor-centre/annual_reports/(retrieved July 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. and Ross, D. G. (2006). ‘Environmental Social Controls and Capital Investments: Australian Evidence’, Accounting and Finance, 46 (4), 677–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainability Development (1998). Cleaner Production and Eco-efficiency, Complementary Approaches to Sustainability Development, United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Jayanthi Kumarasiri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kumarasiri, J. (2012). Management Accounting Practices for Sustainability. In: Gregoriou, G.N., Finch, N. (eds) Best Practices in Management Accounting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230361553_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics