Abstract
Development studies is a multidisciplinary field that interrogates the practices and policies of international development. There is a strong emphasis in the discipline on building theoretical models intended to predict how the manipulation of specific variables may impact on economic growth. With the exception of two theoretical streams with a very marginal status in the field – Post-development and Marxism – it views development as congruent, indeed as isomorphic, with the expansion of the liberal capitalist model on a global scale. In as much as development studies involves a critique of global liberal capitalism, it is a critique of its worst excesses and many of these – poverty, inequality and even exploitation, for example – are viewed as a remnant of earlier economic forms and not as intrinsic to capitalism. Notwithstanding this belief in a benign form of capitalism, it also acknowledges that economic growth on a national or global scale has not reduced inequalities in the distribution of material resources and may even have exacerbated them. In response to this persistence of material inequality, it is centrally concerned with how to ‘lift people out of poverty’ and with erasing the widening material and symbolic inequalities that practitioners, policy makers and academics alike generally regard as the contradictory impacts of development. Given the enormous scope of the development project it is hard to find a discipline that cannot lend itself to the interrogation of development. Its theoreticians include people trained in biology, engineering, health, education, sociology, anthropology, political science, international relations and of course economics. It also engages policy at national and international levels, and has practitioners in government, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and charities. With such a vast theoretical and practical scope the only unity that development studies can claim is in its attention to the same object – economic development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Asad, T. (1993) ‘A Comment on Aijaz Ahmad’s in Theory’, Public Culture, 6(1): 31–39.
Berman, M. (1988) All that is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bhabha, H.K. (1994) The Location of Culture, London: Routledge Press.
Boltanski, L. (1999) Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, S. (2001) States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cowen, M. and Shenton, R. (1995) ‘The Invention of Development’, in J. Crush (ed.), Power of Development, London and New York: Routledge.
Crush, J. (ed.) (1995) Power of Development, London and New York: Routledge.
Edkins, J. (2007) ‘Whatever Politics’, in M. Calarco and S. DeCaroli (eds.), Agamben: Sovereignty and Life, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ferguson, J. (1990) The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’ Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minneapolis Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man, New York: The Free Press.
Gibson, K. and Graham. J. (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Huntington, S. (1997) The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of the World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Manzo, K. (2008) ‘Imaging Humanitarianism: NGO Identity and the Iconography of Childhood’, Antipode, 40(4): 632–657.
McEwan, C. (2008) Post-colonialism and Development, London: Routledge. Nicholson, L. (2003) ‘I can’t face another war report about dead children’ The Guardian, April 8.
Radcliffe, S. (ed.) (2006) ‘Culture in Development Thinking: Geographies, Actors and Paradigms’, Culture and Development in a Globalizing World: Geographies, Actors, and Paradigms, London/New York: Routledge.
Rao, V. and Walton, M. (eds.) (2004) Culture and Public Action, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Reinhardt, M. and Edwards H. (2007) ‘Traffic in Pain’, in M. Reinhardt, H. Edwards and E. Duganne (eds.), Beautiful Suffering, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rojas, C. (2007) ‘International Political Economy/Development Otherwise’, Globalizations, 4(4): 573–587.
Sachs, W. (1992) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, London: Zed Press.
Schech, S. and Haggis, J. (2000) Culture and Development: A Critical Introduction, Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Smith, T. 2008. Humanitarianism and Governmentality: An analysis of The Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response. Unpublished Msc Development Studies Dissertation, Birkbeck College.
Sontag, S. (2003) Regarding the Pain of Others, New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Sylvester, C. (1999) ‘Development Studies and Post-colonial Studies: Disparate Tales of the “Third World” ’, Third World Quarterly, 20(4): 703–721.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Karen Wells
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wells, K. (2012). The Gaze of Development after the Cultural Turn. In: Roseneil, S., Frosh, S. (eds) Social Research after the Cultural Turn. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360839_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360839_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31733-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36083-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)