Skip to main content

Architectural Interventions I: West and East German Postwar Debates

  • Chapter
After the Dresden Bombing

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies ((PMMS))

  • 250 Accesses

Abstract

In 1953 Baedeker published its first postwar Autoführer Deutschland (Drivers’ Guide to Germany), which covered the geographical area of the Federal Republic and West Berlin but not the GDR. The editors had faced considerable problems in the preparation of this publication, as they could not simply update the information in the two prewar editions. Destroyed cities, a displaced refugee population, reconstruction efforts and massive political changes marked the new postwar reality.1 Writing a travel guide about Germany in 1953 was thus a challenging undertaking: not only was it a divided country and an increasingly hot zone of the Cold War, but all large cities had suffered major destruction, and many of the smaller towns had been partly or wholly destroyed. Accordingly, the Baedeker’s section ‘The Country and its Inhabitants’ opens with the rather forced attempt to marry the register of the traditional guidebook with the acknowledgement that the built environment, the political order and the cultural face of Germany had been radically altered by the war. Nevertheless, the opening passage introduces Germany in the register of the conventional guidebook as a country with a varied and beautiful landscape and a rich cultural heritage. However, the second paragraph departs from this convention, depicting the stark reality of the effects of the war in a decidedly sober tone:

During the Second World War many larger cities but also smaller towns suffered huge destruction through the Allied air attacks, which had dropped 1.5 million tons of bombs on Germany, destroying 3 million apartments, as well as through fighting on the ground and detonations by German forces. 400 million cubic metres of rubble covered the area of the old Reich, one seventh of this (55 million) alone in Berlin. Three quarters of this destruction was caused by fire. In March 1942 Lübeck fell victim to the first large-scale attack.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. W. Schlegel, ‘Geschichte der romantischen Literatur’, in Kritische Schriften und Briefe, ed. Edgar Lohner (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1965) vol. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johann Gottlieb Friedrich Fichte, Reden an die deutsche Nation, ed. Rainhard Lauth (Hamburg: Meiner, 1978). For a differentiated discussion of Herder’s, Fichte’s and Schlegel’s conceptions of historicity see Maike Oergel, Culture and Identity: Historicity in German Thought 1770–1815 (Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. See also Hans-Ulrich Wehler, Nationalismus: Geschichte, Formen, Folgen (Munich: Beck, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Otto Dann, Nation und Nationalismus in Deutschland 1770–1990 (Munich: Beck, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedrich Meinecke, Die deutsche Katastrophe, in Autobiographische Schriften, ed. and introduced Eberhard Kessel (Stuttgart: K. F. Koehler, 1969), 323–445.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas Mann, ‘Deutschland und die Deutschen’, in Politische Schriften und Reden, ed. Hans Bürgin (Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer, 1968), vol. 3: 161–78 (here 166). Cited as DuD in the main body of text.

    Google Scholar 

  7. On German preservationist discourse from the nineteenth century to the 1970s see Rudy Koshar’s seminal study Germany’s Transient Pasts: Preservation and National Memory in the Twentieth Century (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hesse’s letter was cited by Georg Hartmann, the Chairman of the Freie Deutsche Hochstift, on the occasion of the opening of the Goethe-Haus in 1951. See Nobert Huse, Denkmalpflege: Deutsche Texte aus drei Jahrhunderten (Munich: Beck, 2006), 202–04 (here 203).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alfons Leitl, ‘Die Massenhaftigkeit und die Tradition’, in Ulrich Conrads and Peter Neitzke (eds), Die Städte himmeloffen:. Reden und Reflexionen über den Wiederaufbau des Untergegangenen und die Wiederkehr des Neuen Bauens 1948/49 (Basle, Boston, Berlin: Birkhäuser, 2003), 131–40 (here 134).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Franz Meunier, ‘Illusion oder Schicksal?’, Baukunst und Werkform 2 (1947): 21–26 (here 21).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walter Dirks, ‘Mut zum Abschied’, Baukunst und Werkform 2 (1947): 27–28 (here 27).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walter Muschg, ‘Eine Sehenswürdigkeit für reisende Kuriositätenhändler?’, Baukunst und Werkform 2 (1947): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christian Mohr, ‘Überlegungen zum Denkmalbegriff der Nachkriegszeit’, in Juliane Kirschbaum (ed.), Architektur und Städtebau der fünziger Jahre (Bonn: Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Nationalkomitees für Denkmalschutz, 1988), vol. 36: 16–26 (here 18.)

    Google Scholar 

  14. See also Karl Moersch and Reinhold Weber (eds), Die Zeit nach dem Krieg: Städte im Wiederaufbau (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. On the Garden City see Ebenezer Howard’s foundational publication Garden-Cities of Tomorrow (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1902).

    Google Scholar 

  16. For the German debate Hans Kampffmeyer, Die Gartenstadtbewegung (Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a comparative study of the garden city movement see Stephen V. Ward (ed.), The Garden City: Past, Present and Future (London, New York: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. On urban utopias see Robert Fishman, Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century, Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eugen Blanck, ‘Frankfurt am Main’, Baukunst und Werkform 1 (1947): 26–27 (here 26).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hans Scharoun, ‘Berlin’, Baukunst und Werkform 1 (1947): 24–26 (here 26).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hans Scharoun, ‘Ansprache zur Eröffnung der Berliner Ausstellung am 22. August 1946’, Der Bauhelfer 5 (1946): 1–4 (here 1).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Akademie der Künste (ed.), Martin Wagner 1885–1957: Wohnungsbau und Weltstadtplanung. Die Rationalisierung des Glücks (Berlin: Akademie der Künste, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin Wagner, ‘Wenn ich Baumeister von Deutschland wäre’, Aufbau 9 (1946): 871–87 (here 875).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hugo Häring, ‘Neues Bauen’, Baukunst und Werkform 1 (1947): 30–36 (here 36).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johann Göderitz, Roland Rainer and Hubert Hoffmann, Die gegliederte und aufgelockerte Stadt (Tübingen: Wasmuth, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Gerhard Rabeler, Wiederaufbau und Expansion westdeutscher Städte 1945–1960, 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Klaus von Beyme, Der Wiederaufbau: Architektur und Städtebaupolitik in beiden deutschen Staaten (Munich, Zurich: Piper, 1987), 128–47.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hartwig Beseler and Niels Gutschow, Kriegsschicksale deutscher Architektur: Verluste, Schäden, Wiederaufbau (Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz, ny), vol. 2: 1253–55.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For a broad survey of the reconstruction of Stuttgart see Harald Schukraft, ‘Stuttgart nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg: Neubeginn auf Trümmern’, in Karl Moersch and Reinhold Weber (eds), Die Zeit nach dem Krieg: Städte im Wiederaufbau (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2008), 339–68.

    Google Scholar 

  30. On Pforzheim see Christian Groh, ‘Pforzheim–von einer Trümmerwüste zum modernen Stadtbild’, in Karl Moersch and Reinhold Weber (eds), Die Zeit nach dem Krieg, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  31. On the early plans for Berlin see Werner Durth, Jörn Düwel and Niels Gutschow, Architektur und Städtebau der DDR: die frühen Jahre (Berlin: Jovis, 2007), 90–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Anne Fuchs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, A. (2012). Architectural Interventions I: West and East German Postwar Debates. In: After the Dresden Bombing. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230359529_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics