Advertisement

Counting the Voices in the Heavenly Chorus: Pressure Participants in Washington Politics

  • Kay Lehman Schlozman
Chapter
Part of the Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series book series (IGAD)

Abstract

The research project reported on in this chapter began with a pledge: No new data. But asking me and my long-time collaborators Sidney Verba and Henry Brady not to collect new data is akin – to paraphrase Calvin Trillin – to suggesting that the customs official exhibit no curiosity about the plastic bag containing the white powder. We soon broke that initial vow and now find ourselves with an extensive database of Washington pressure participants – organizations that have sought policy influence in Washington – assembled to serve as the complement to individuallevel data in a study of inequalities of political voice in American democracy.1 In this chapter, I address the twin tasks of explaining how the findings from the data set inform the objectives of our inquiry and suggesting lessons from the massive challenge of data gathering that might assist those conducting subsequent efforts in this vein.

Keywords

Voluntary Association Business Association National Politics Political Equality General Account Office 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burns, N., K. L. Schlozman, and S. Verba (2001) The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Jordan, G., D. Halpin, and W. Maloney (2004) ‘Defining Interests: Disambiguation and the Need for New Distinctions?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lowery, D., V. Gray, J. Anderson, and A. J. Newmark (2004) ‘Collective Action and the Mobilization of Institutions’, Journal of Politics, 66, 684–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Salant, J. D. (1995a) ‘Senate Passes Tighter Rules on Registration, Disclosure’, Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, July 29, p. 2239.Google Scholar
  5. Salant, J. D. (1995b) ‘Highlights of Lobby Bill’, Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, December 2, p. 3632.Google Scholar
  6. Salisbury, R. H. (1984) ‘Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions’, American Political Science Review, 78, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) Semi-Sovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).Google Scholar
  8. Schlozman, K. L. and J. T. Tierney (1986) Organized Interests and American Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
  9. Strolovitch, D. Z. (2007) Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism and American Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kay Lehman Schlozman 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kay Lehman Schlozman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations