Advertisement

Politics Is Not Basketball: Numbers Are Not Results

  • Grant Jordan
  • Darren Halpin
Chapter
Part of the Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series book series (IGAD)

Abstract

The original intention underpinning this book was to address both the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of researching numbers and groups: to set out conclusions from recent research but, just as importantly, to provide something of a manual anticipating practical issues that will need to be faced in future research. In scholarly enterprises, one can easily start off with hopes of seamless synthesis, but this volume is as much about celebrating diversity as looking for coherence. So great is the diversity captured that in reflecting on the messages of the contributions, one cannot escape asking whether there is a common scholarly enterprise stretching from Mohan’s search for community activity ‘below the radar’ in England to Schlozman’s tracking of organizational activity in Washington. However, on balance, the conclusions are positive. While the volume of course leaves us short of a full understanding of the pattern of groups, organized interests, and associations in different countries over time, we can now much more clearly see the issues that set that up as an unrealistic aim. The chapters focus on activity at different levels – supranational, national, subnational, and local. They span different institutional arenas – legislative, media, administrative, and legal. And they focus on counting efforts guided by different (defensibly so) approaches. A single overarching research approach is unlikely to meaningfully capture this scope.

Keywords

Interest Group Collective Action Business Group Group Number Organize Interest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumgartner, F., H. Larsen-Price, B. Leech, and P. Rutledge (2011) ‘Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying’, Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkhout, J. and D. Lowery (2011) ‘Short-Term Volatility in the EU Interest Community’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, J. (1999) The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, K. (1971) ‘Australian Farm Organisations: The Unity Issue’, Politics, 6(2), 148–60.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, G. R. and M. T. Hannan (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Dür, A. and G. Mateo (2011) ‘National Associations and Lobbying on EU Legislation: Is Access Biased?’, paper prepared for a workshop on ‘Interest Groups, European Integration and the State’, Oxford University, May 21, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Eising, R. (2007) ‘Institutional Context, Organizational Resources and Strategic Choices: Explaining Interest Group Access in the European Union’, European Union Politics, 8(3), 329–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grønbjerg, K. A. (2002) ‘Evaluating Nonprofit Databases’, American Behavioral Scientist, 45(11), 1741–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halpin, D. and G. Jordan (2009) ‘Interpreting Environments: Interest Group Response to Population Ecology Pressures’, British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 243–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halpin, D. and A. Nownes (2011) ‘Reappraising the Survival Question: Why We Should Focus on Interest Group “Organizational Form” and “Careers” ’, in A. Cigler and B. Loomis (eds.) Interest Group Politics 8th edn. (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press).Google Scholar
  11. Hannan, M. T. (2005) ‘Ecologies of Organizations: Diversity and Identity’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinz, J., E. Laumann, R. Nelson, and R. Salisbury (1993) The Hollow Core (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Held, D. (2006) Models of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  14. Jordan, G. and D. Halpin (2006) ‘The Political Costs of Policy Coherence? Constructing a “Rural” Policy for Scotland’, Journal of Public Policy, 26, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  16. McCarthy, J. (2005) ‘Persistence and Change among Nationally Federated Social Movements’, in G. Davis, D. McAdam, W. Scott, and M. Zald (eds.) Social Movements and Organization Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Page, E. and B. Jenkins (2005) Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salisbury, R. H. (1969) ‘An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salisbury, R. H. (1984) ‘Interest Representation: The Dominance of Interest Groups’, American Political Science Review, 78(1), 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salisbury, R. H. (1990) ‘The Paradox of Interest Groups in Washington, DC’, in A. King (ed.) The New American Political System, 2nd edn (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute).Google Scholar
  22. Schmitter, P. C. (1982) ‘Reflections on Where the Theory of Neo-Corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-Corporatism May Be Going’, in G. Lembruch and P. Schmitter (eds.) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  23. Skocpol, T. (1999) ‘Advocates without Members: The Recent Transformation of American Civic Life’, in T. Skocpol and M. P. Fiorina (eds.) Civic Engagement in American Democracy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).Google Scholar
  24. Truman, D. B. (1951) The Governmental Process (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).Google Scholar
  25. Walker, E. T., J. D. McCarthy, and F. Baumgartner (2011) ‘Replacing Members with Managers? Mutualism among Membership and Nonmembership Advocacy Organizations in the United States’, American Journal of Sociology, 116(4), 1284–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wonka, A., F. Baumgartner, C. Mahoney, and J. Berkhout (2010) ‘Measuring the Size and Scope of the EU Interest Group Population’, European Union Politics, 11(3), 463–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Young, M. (2010) ‘The Price of Advocacy: Mobilization and Maintenance in Advocacy Organizations’, in A. Prakash and M. K. Gugerty (eds.) Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Grant Jordan and Darren Halpin 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grant Jordan
  • Darren Halpin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations