Skip to main content

The Normative in Perception

  • Chapter
Contemporary Kantian Metaphysics
  • 190 Accesses

Abstract

Suppose I tell a friend that the rose bush on my front porch is in bloom. If he wonders how I know such a thing, I might respond that I saw it as I left for work this morning. If pressed, I might invite my friend home so he can see the bush for himself. What is supposed to be served by my report of what I saw? It is supposed to provide justification for what I say by grounding it in what I see. But what does ‘grounding’ mean here? My claim about the rose bush is a claim about an entity in the world, and I assume that looking at such an entity warrants the claim, that perceiving it underwrites the truth of what I say. Sceptics have often questioned this assumption, pointing out that perception can be deceptive in many ways; indeed, we may have no good reason for holding that any perception delivers the world as it is. When I make a judgement, the object about which I judge becomes a standard against which the judgement may be measured: if the object is as I say it is, then my judgement is true (i.e., does what it is supposed to do as this judgement); if not, not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barber, M. (2008) ‘Holism and Horizon: Husserl and McDowell on Nonconceptual Content’, Husserl Studies, 24(2), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (1994) Making it Explicit (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, S. (2007)’Conscience and Reason: Heidegger and the Grounds of Intentionality’, in S. Crowell and J. Malpas (eds) Transcendental Heidegger (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, S. (2010) ‘Transcendental Logic and “Minimal Empiricism”: Lask andMcDowell on the Unboundedness of the Conceptual’, in R. Makkreel and S. Luft (eds) Neo- Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, D.O. (2007) ‘The Intentionality of Passive Experience: Husserl and a Contemporary Debate’, The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, VII, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1999) ‘The Primacy of Phenomenology Over Logical Analysis’, Philosophical Topics, 27(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (2000) ‘Response to Searle’, in M. Wrathall and J. Malpas (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science. Essays in Honor of Hubert Dreyfus, Vol. 2 (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (2007) ‘Why Heideggerian AI Failed and how Fixing it would Require making it more Heideggerian’, Philosophical Psychology, 20(2), 247–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, J. (1979–80)’On Seeing a Material Thing in Space: The Role of Kinaesthesis in Visual Perception’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 40, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, J. (1990) Husserlian Intentionality and Non- Foundational Realism (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsborg, H. (2006) ‘Aesthetic Judgment and Perceptual Normativity’, Inquiry, 49(5), 403–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. (2008) ‘Husserl on Sensation, Perception and Interpretation’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 38(2), 219–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W.(2008) ‘Conceptualism and the Myth of the Given’, European Journal of Philosophy, 17(3), 363–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1966) Analysenzurpassiven Synthesis (1918- 1926), Husserliana Bd. XI, M. Fleischer (ed.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970) Logical Investigations, trans. J.N. Findlay (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1973) Experience and Judgment, trans. J.S. Churchill and K. Ameriks (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1989) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological

    Google Scholar 

  • Philosophy, Second Book, trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer (Dordrecht: Kluwer); Ideenzueinerreinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, Husserliana Bd. IV, Marly Biemel (ed.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (2004) Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit: Texte aus dem Nachlass(1893- 1912), Husserliana Bd. XXXVIII, T. Vongehr and R. Giuliani (eds)(Dordrecht: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1968) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N.K. Smith (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. (2000) The Relevance of Phenomenology to the Philosophy of Language and Mind (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmar, D. (2008) Phänomenologie der schwachen Phantasie, Phaenomenologica 185 (Dordrecht: Springer)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1994) Mind and World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (2009) ‘Avoiding the Myth of the Given’, Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau- Ponty, M. (1962)The Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, T. (2010) ‘Understanding and Simple Seeing in Husserl’, Husserl Studies, 26(1), 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2004) Action in Perception (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2006) ‘Experience of the World in Time’, Analysis, 66(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (2005) ‘Mind, Body, and World: Todes and McDowell on Bodies and Language’, Inquiry, 48(1), 38–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert, C. (2006) ‘Is the Appearance of Shape Protean?’, Psyche, 12(1), 1–16; http://www.theassc.org/vol_12_2006 (last accessed November 23, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewert, C. (forthcoming) ‘Intellectualism, Experience, and Motor Understanding’, in J. Schear (ed.) The Myth of the Mental?

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007) Mind in Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. and Dreyfus, H. (1993) ‘Intentionality and the Phenomenology of

    Google Scholar 

  • Action’, in E. Lepore and R. van Gulick (eds) John Searle and His Critics (Oxford:

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Steven Crowell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crowell, S. (2012). The Normative in Perception. In: Baiasu, R., Bird, G., Moore, A.W. (eds) Contemporary Kantian Metaphysics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358911_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics