Abstract
Objective thinking is a mode of understanding which aims to leave behind local viewpoints or perspectival engagement with the world. The enlargement of understanding through objectification can be thought of as a gradual process of progressive detachment from specific perspectives on the world. In The View from Nowhere, Thomas Nagel refers to degrees of the objectivity with which we can approach some aspect of reality. For example, he contends that the ‘standpoint of morality is more objective than that of private life, but less objective than the standpoint in physics’.2 He compares the process of objectification and the corresponding layers of understanding with ‘a set of concentric spheres, progressively revealed as we detach gradually from the contingencies of the self’.3 Nagel refers to a classical picture of the process of enlargement of understanding: this process is taken to begin with the interaction between our bodies and the world which produces sensations and perceptions in us.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allison, H. (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).
Bird, G. (2006) The Revolutionary Kant, A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason (Chicago: Open Court).
Carman, T. (1999) ‘The Body in Husserl and Merleau- Ponty’, Philosophical Topics, 27(2), 205–25.
Chisholm, D. (2008) ‘Climbing Like A Girl: an Exemplary Adventure in Feminist Phenomenology’, Hypatia, 9–40.
Heidegger, M. (1997) Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell); (1993) Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer).
Husserl, E. (1960) Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. D. Cairns (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).
Husserl, E. (1964) The Phenomenology of Internal Time- Consciousness, trans. J.S. Churchill (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
Husserl, E. (1966) Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1839–1917), X, Husserliana (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).
Kant, I. (1986) Inaugural Dissertation in Kant’s Latin Writings, trans. L.W. Beck,
M.J. Gregor, R. Meerbote and J. Reuscher (eds) (New York: Peter Lang). Merleau- Ponty, M. (2002) Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith (London: Routledge).
Moore, A.W. (1997) Points of View (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Nagel, T. (1979) Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Williams, B. (1978) Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry (London: Penguin Books).
Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Fontana).
Young, I.M. (1980) ‘Throwing Like a Girl. A Phenomenology of Feminine Body, Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality’, Human Studies, 3, 137–56.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Roxana Baiasu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baiasu, R. (2012). Space and the Limits of Objectivity: Could There Be a Disembodied Thinking of Reality?. In: Baiasu, R., Bird, G., Moore, A.W. (eds) Contemporary Kantian Metaphysics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358911_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358911_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32996-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35891-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)