Abstract
Both the International Labour Office’s first cautious attempts to move beyond the tight framework of the NLC towards a broader approach to social problems in the colonies and the first attempts at colonial reform within the colonial bureaucracies were rudely interrupted by the Second World War. When in 1940 the ILO headquarters was forced to leave Geneva for exile in Canada, its main priority initially was just to be able to continue its colonial work at all. The Office’s colonial expert, Wilfrid Benson, was sent to London, but, apart from liaising with a small circle of British reformers, he could not do much more at first than review what had already been achieved. When the ILO began planning for the period after the war at the Conference of 1941, colonial issues were still way down its list of priorities. In the end, it was only the course of events taken by the war itself that reinstated colonial reform as a matter of urgency — indeed, one of even greater urgency than previously. The universalistic message of the Atlantic Charter, an attempt by the liberal democracies to make up lost credit by promising their people a better and more socially just future, could not easily be kept from the colonies. The loss of South-East Asian possessions to the Japanese and America’s entry into the war also raised new arguments for a change in policy. In fact, this phase of the Second World War caused a literal “sea change of Empire”.1 The colonial powers now increasingly recognized that a new approach was needed — first, to recover their dominion over the colonies and to safeguard it for the period after the war, and, second, to accommodate the anti-colonial criticism and demands of their American allies. The Office saw these developments as a challenge to come up with an outline for a new social policy for the colonies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. Betts: Decolonization: The making of the contemporary world (London/New York, Routledge, 1998), p. 19.
M. Shipway, Decolonization and its impact: A comparative approach to the end of colonial empires (Oxford, Blackwell, 2008), pp. 61–87.
A. Alcock: History of the International Labour Organisation (London, Macmillan, 1970), pp. 158 ff.
See F. Perkins: The Roosevelt I knew (New York, Viking, 1946), pp. 344 ff.
See P.S. Gupta: Imperialism and the British labour movement 1914–1964 (London, Holmes & Meier, 1975).
See F. Cooper: Decolonization and African society: The labor question in French and British Africa (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 58–65.
M.W. Hailey (Lord Hailey): An African survey (London, Oxford University Press, 1938).
ILO: Social policy in dependent territories (Geneva, 1944), pp. 32–42.
D. K. Fieldhouse: The West and the Third World: Trade, colonialism and dependence (Oxford, Blackwell, 1999), p. 86.
On the significance of the Atlantic Charter (Joint Declaration of the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Great Britain, 14 Aug. 1941) see P.G. Lauren: The evolution of international human rights: Visions seen (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998), pp. 141–43.
See G. van Goethem: “Conflicting interests: The International Federation of Trade Unions (1919–1945)”, in A. Carew et al. (eds): The International Confederation of Trade Unions (Berne, Peter Lang, 2000), p. 115.
M. Mazower: The dark continent: Europe’s twentieth century (London, Allen Lane, 1998), p. 267.
R. von Albertini: Dekolonisation. Die Diskussion über Zukunft und Verwaltung der Kolonien 1919–1960 (Cologne, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1966), p. 199.
W. Roger Louis and R. Robinson: “The United States and the liquidation of the British Empire in tropical Africa, 1941–1951”, in: P. Gifford and W.R. Louis (eds): The transfer of power in Africa: Decolonization 1940–1960 (New Haven, Conn./ London, Yale University Press, 1982), p. 32.
See P.F. Hooper: “The Institute of Pacific Relations and the origins of Asian and Pacific studies”, in: Pacific Affairs (1988), Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 98–121.
Netherlands Information Bureau: The Netherlands East Indies (London, 1943), quoted in ILO: Social policy in dependent territories, p. 63.
Anti-Slavery and Aborigines Protection Society: An International Colonial Convention (London, 1943), quoted in ILO: Social policy in dependent territories, p. 68.
M.W. Hailey (Lord Hailey): Great Britain and her dependencies (London, Oxford University Press, 1943), pp. 29 ff.
Copyright information
© 2012 International Labour Organization
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maul, D. (2012). “The Promise of a New Earth to Till”: The ILO’S Colonial Work in Exile, 1940–43. In: Human Rights, Development and Decolonization. International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358638_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358638_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34471-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35863-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)