Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applying Foucault’s Toolkit to CSDP

  • Chapter
Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

Michel Foucault was not a student of the international and Foucauldian approaches to international relations (IR) and European Union (EU) studies do not constitute a school. The toolkit of concepts for social analysis he and those inspired by him have developed do not aim at building a substantive theory of anything, and Foucault did not pretend otherwise when he declared: ‘I would like my books to be a kind of tool-box which others can rummage through to find a tool which they can use however they wish in their own area’ (Foucault 1994: 523). The strength of Foucault’s tools is their critical edge. They have the power to cut deep into conventional wisdom (academic and popular). This chapter introduces readers who have little or no knowledge of Foucault to his toolkit. It argues that the toolkit can be used productively, albeit within limits, to investigate the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aggestam, L. (ed.) (2008) ‘Special Issue: The EU as an Ethical Power’, International Affairs, 84 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley,R.K. (1987) ‘The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics’, Alternatives, 12: 403–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley,R.K. (1988) ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17 (2): 227–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzacq, T. (ed.) (2009) The External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs: Governance, Neighbours, Security, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2002) ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27 (1): 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2006) ‘Internal and External Aspects of Security’, European Security, 15 (4): 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M., Blum, J.A., George, S., Gille, Z., Thayer, M., Gowan, T., Haney, L., Klawiter, M., Lopez, S.H. and Riain, S. (2000) Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1998) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2007) ‘EU Statebuilding: Securing the Liberal Peace through EU Enlargement’, Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations, 21 (4): 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2010) International Statebuilding: The Rise of Post-Liberal Governance, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R. (1992) Self/Power/Other: Political Theory and Dialogical Ethics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2005) ‘EU Concept for ESDP Support to Security Sector Reform (SSR)’, Brussels, 13 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.W. (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, M Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2): 126–155. CSDP Newsletter (2010), Brussels, no. 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2007) Governing Societies: Political Perspectives on Domestic and International Rule, Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (2004) ‘Europe’s Others and the Return of Geopolitics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17 (2): 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (2005) ‘Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering “Normative Power Europe”’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33 (3): 613–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. and Reid, J. (2009) The Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2009) Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1997) The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge, New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, in D.F. Bouchard (ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994) Dits et écrits II (1970–1975), Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegout, C. (2009) ‘The West, Realism and Intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo (1996–2006)’, International Peacekeeping, 16 (2): 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. (2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heng, Y.-K. and McDonagh, K. (2008) ‘The Other War on Terror Revealed: Global Governmentality and the Financial Action Task Force’s Campaign Against Terrorist Financing’, Review of International Studies, 34 (3): 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, J. (2010) Strategy and the Importance of Defence Cooperation among EU Member States, Security Policy Brief, no. 12, Egmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde-Price, A. (2006) ‘“Normative” Power Europe: a Realist Critique’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (2): 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inda, J.X. (ed.) (2005) Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, E. and Sperling, J. (2007) EU Security Governance, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (eds.) (2010) National Security Cultures, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahmann, E. (2003) Multilevel Networks in European Foreign Policy, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahmann, E. (2005) ‘Security Governance and Networks: New Theoretical Perspectives in Transatlantic Security’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18 (1): 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W. and Walters, W. (eds.) (2004) Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, H. (1997) Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, H. (2005) Analysing the Foreign Policy of Small States in the EU: The Case of Denmark, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986) ‘The Powers of Association’, in J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 264–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988) ‘How to Write “The Prince” For Machines as Well as for Machinations’, in B. Elliott (ed.), Technology and Social Change, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 20–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (2009) ‘Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social’, Theory Culture Society, 26 (6): 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005) Power: A Radical View, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, T. (2008) ‘Power and Agency in the Human Security Framework’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21 (1): 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M. (2007) ‘Everything Is Dangerous: A Critique of “Normative Power Europe”’, Security Dialogue, 38 (4): 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M. (2011) ‘From Governance to Governmentality in CSDP: Towards a Foucauldian Research Agenda’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49 (1): 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M. with Ostrauskaitė, R. (2005) ‘Power/Knowledge in International Peacebuilding: The Case of the EU Police Mission in Bosnia’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 30: 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M. with Ostrauskaitė, R. (2006) European Union Peacebuilding and Policing: Governance and the European Security and Defence Policy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1995) ‘Political Thought and the Limits of Orthodoxy: A Response to Curtis’, British Journal of Sociology, 46 (4): 590–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, J. (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5 (2): 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A.W. (2009) ‘Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47 (2): 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B. (2007) ‘“A Speech That the Entire Ministry May Stand for,” or: Why Diplomats Never Produce Anything New’, International Political Sociology, 1 (2): 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G.R. (2009) ‘The EU and Military Conflict Management in Africa: For the Good of Africa or Europe?’, International Peacekeeping, 16 (2): 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. and Collier, S.J. (eds.) (2005) Global Assemblages: Technologies, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2002) ‘International Peacebuilding and the “Mission Civilisatrice”’, Review of International Studies, 28: 637–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, T. (2009) ‘Governing the Knowledge Society: Studying Lisbon as Epistemic Setting’, European Integration Online Papers, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pupavac, V. (2002) ‘Pathologizing Populations and Colonizing Minds: International Psychosocial Programs in Kosovo’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pupavac, V. (2004) ‘War on the Couch: The Emotionology of the New International Security Paradigm’, European Journal of Social Theory, 7 (2): 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. and Rose, N. (2006) ‘Biopower Today’, Biosocieties, 1: 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, J. S. (1997) Foucault’s Discipline: The Politics of Subjectivity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O.P. and Franks, J. (2009) Liberal Peace Transitions: Between Statebuilding and Peacebuilding, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S.M. (2003) ‘Global Strategic Vision: Managing the World’, in R.W. Perry and B. Maurer (eds.), Globalization under Construction: Governmentality, Law, and Identity, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N.S. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E., (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America, Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, E. (ed.) (2009) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sending, O.J. and Neumann, I.B. (2006) ‘Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power’, International Studies Quarterly, 50: 651–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solana, J. (2009) ‘Ten Years of European Security and Defence Policy’, Brussels, ESDP Newsletter, no. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling-Folker, J. and Shinko, R.E. (2007) ‘Discourses of Power: Traversing the Realist–Postmodern Divide’, in Berenskoetter, F. and Williams, M.J. (eds.), Power in World Politics, London: Routledge. 244–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (2000) ‘The EU as a Security Actor: Reflections from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Post-Sovereign Security Orders’, in M. Kelstrup and Williams, M.J. (eds), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration, London: Routledge. 250–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (2005) ‘European Integration and Security: Analysing French and German Discourses on State, Nation, and Europe’, in Howarth, D. and Jacob, T. (eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagnsson, C., Sperling, J.A. and Hallenberg, J. (eds) (2009) European Security Governance: The European Union in a Westphalian World, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. (1992) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. and Haahr, J.H. (2005) Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, M., Croft, S., Howorth, J., Terriff, T. and Krahmann, E. (2004) ‘The Governance of European Security’, Review of International Studies, 30: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, R.G. (ed.) (2010) Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Michael Merlingen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Central European University, Hungary

    Xymena Kurowska (Assistant Professor) (Assistant Professor)

  2. European University Institute, Italy

    Fabian Breuer (Assistant to the President) (Assistant to the President)

Copyright information

© 2012 Michael Merlingen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merlingen, M. (2012). Applying Foucault’s Toolkit to CSDP. In: Kurowska, X., Breuer, F. (eds) Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355729_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation