Skip to main content

Introduction: The Role of Theory in Research on Common Security and Defence Policy

  • Chapter
Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

Research on European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP), which has become Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)1 with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, is said to be notoriously undertheorised. The first wave of literature on the subject resembles diplomatic history, being based on journalistic accounts of key events. It tends to cite official documents about institutional development, together with anecdotal, politically loaded or otherwise speculative evidence about the motivational factors (Forberg 2006). Subsequent works either deliberately avoid over-theoretical explanations (Howorth 2007), apply one distinct theoretical lens — as is the case of research on the socialisation of Brusselsbased elites — or are concerned with policy description, where theory allegedly obscures the understanding of political reality. The present volume seeks to address this charge of undertheorisation. It brings together scholars in the field who map their respective theoretical apparatuses, reflect on their purchase and illustrate how they have informed their empirical explorations. Diversity of theoretical assumptions has pervaded the literature on the subject from the outset. The available work on CSDP builds its explanations on distinct — if implicit — premises, which inform its prescriptions for how policy should develop. In this respect, it illustrates the notion that all theories intertwine empirical and normative ingredients (Reus-Smit and Snidal 2009), sometimes in denial, sometimes subconsciously, sometimes overtly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005) ‘Power in International Politics’, International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M and Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organisation in Global Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, Ch., Irondelle, B., Menon, A. (2011) ‘Security Cooperation beyond the Nation-state: The EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2000) ‘When Two Becomes One: Internal and External Securitisations in Europe’, in Morten Kelstrup and Michael C. Williams (eds.), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration, New York: Routledge, pp. 171–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in Keohane, R. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 204–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (2005) ‘Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering “Normative Power Europe”’, Millennium 33 (3): 613–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. and Wiener, A. (eds.) (2009) European Integration Theory, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. and Gross, E. (2007) Evaluating the EU’s Crisis Missions in the Balkans, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierke, K. (1998) Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, T. (2006) ‘Explaining the Emergence of the ESDP: Setting the Research Agenda’. Paper prepared at the British International Studies Association Meeting, Cork, 18–20 December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, A. and Wallace, W. (2000) ‘Common Foreign and Security Policy. From Shadow To Substance?’, in Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 461–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2001) Social Science Methodology. A Critical Framework, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (2008) ‘Narrating the Process: Questioning the Progressive Story of European Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46 (3): 641–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1986) ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, in Keohane, R. (ed.), Realism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2006) The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevi, G. and Keohane, D. (eds.) (2009) Ten Years of the European Security and Defence Policy, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. (2009) The Europeanization of National Foreign Policy. Continuity and Change in European Crisis Management, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. and Juncos, A. (eds.) (2011) EU Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management: Roles, Institutions and Policies, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzini, S. (2001) ‘The Significance and Roles of Teaching Theory in International Relations’, Journal of International Relations and Development 4 (2): 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, J. (2000) ‘Britain, France and the European Defence Initiative’, Survival 42 (2): 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, J. (2007) Security and Defence Policy in the European Union, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2006) The Politics of Insecurity. Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juncos, A. and Reynolds, C. (2007) ‘The Political and Security Committee: Governing in the Shadow’, European Foreign Affairs Review 12 (2): 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. (2008) ‘Constructivism: What It Is (not) and How It Matters’ in Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. (eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurowska, X. and P. Pawlak (2012) (eds.) The Politics of European Security Policies: Actors, Dynamics and Contentious Outcomes, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: a Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A. (2009) ‘Empowering Paradise? The ESDP at Ten’, International Affairs 85 (2): 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A. (2011) ‘Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutional Theory’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mérand, F. (2008) European Defence Policy: Beyond the Nation State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M. (2007) ‘Everything Is Dangerous: A Critique of “Normative Power Europe”’, Security Dialogue 38 (4): 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M. and Ostrauskaite, R. (2005) ‘Power/Knowledge in International Peacebuilding: The Case of the EU Police Mission in Bosnia’, Alternatives 30: 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M. and Ostrauskaite, R. (eds.) (2008) The European Security and Defence Policy: Implementation and Impact, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. and Strickmann, E. (2011) ‘Solidifying Constructivism: How Material and Ideational Factors Interact in European Defence’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øhrgaard, J.C. (1997) ‘Less than Supranational, More than Intergovernmental: European Political Cooperation and the Dynamics of Intergovernmental Integration’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 26 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. (2002) ‘The Many Faces of Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5): 921–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pond, E. (1999) ‘Kosovo: A Catalyst for Europe’, Washington Quarterly 22 (4): 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959) Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, B. (2006) ‘ESDP: Response to Unipolarity?’, Security Studies 15 (2): 149–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (2000) Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change, European Integration Online Papers 4 (8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. (2009) ‘Between Utopia and Reality: The Practical Discourses of International Relations’ in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, U. (2009) ‘Strategy by Stealth? The Development of EU Internal and External Security Strategies’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10 (4): 486–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. (2005) The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2008) ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’ in Dunne, T. et al. (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham, P. (2000) ‘Europe’s Common Defence Policy: Implications for the Transatlantic Relationship’, Security Dialogue 31 (2): 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Munster, R. (2009) Securitizing Immigration: The Politics of Risk in the EU, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1997) ‘Evaluating Theories’, American Political Science Review 91 (4): 913–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1998) ‘On Constitution and Causation in International Relations’, Review of International Studies 24 (5): 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (2009) ‘Waltz’s Theory of Theory’, International Relations 23 (2): 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M. (1996) ‘All these Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling up: Theories, Theorists, Theorising’ in S. Smith, K. Booth and M. Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 340–353.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Xymena Kurowska

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kurowska, X. (2012). Introduction: The Role of Theory in Research on Common Security and Defence Policy. In: Kurowska, X., Breuer, F. (eds) Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355729_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics