Skip to main content

Framing and Ranking

  • Chapter
  • 1711 Accesses

Abstract

It is a well-established fact that agents react to the way prospects are framed (see Tversky and Thaler 1990). Decision-makers also frame decisions, for instance because the decision must reflect their social or moral concerns in contrast to their material ambitions. When decisions are framed, the question arises as to whether this has consequences for the ranking of preferences. Does this lead to conflicting motives when considering prospects and, as a consequence, to multiple rankings?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Jan de Jonge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Jonge, J. (2012). Framing and Ranking. In: Rethinking Rational Choice Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355545_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics