Abstract
‘Precision, speed, unambiguity, knowledge of the files, continuity, discretion, unity, strict subordination, reduction of friction and of material and personal costs.’ This is what Max Weber (1970, p. 214) saw, about 100 years ago, as the advantages of political delegation of powers to the bureaucracy. Delegation would increase the capacity of the government immensely. ‘The bureaucracy compares with other organizations exactly as does the machine with the non-mechanical modes of production’ (ibid., p. 214). However, while praising the technical potential of delegation of powers to the bureaucracy Weber was also deeply worried about the political influence of the bureaucracy. ‘The power position of a fully developed bureaucracy is always overtowering. The “political master” finds himself in the position of the dilettante who stands opposite the “expert”’ (ibid., p. 232).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Jens Blom-Hansen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blom-Hansen, J. (2011). A Delegation Perspective on Comitology. In: The EU Comitology System in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353268_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353268_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31715-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35326-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)