Skip to main content
  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

The best way to summarize the United States’ global primacy from World War II until the administration of President George W. Bush is to state that it was done through a series of highly intricate maneuvers lasting several decades, which included alliance building, soft balancing and selective cooperation. As much as the Bush administration was known for its penchant for unilateralism, it should be noted that it did not have sole monopoly in this behavior. The evolution of this type of strategic maneuver was quite obvious during the presidencies of George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, especially in their dealings with Russia, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) war against Yugoslavia, as was discussed in Chapter 3. George W. Bush took unilateralism to a new height in his declaration of the so-called global war on terrorism (GWOT), and the unilateral manner in which he decided to invade Iraq, without the sanction of the United Nations (UN), which epitomizes international legitimacy. The reaction of the three great powers of this study to the Bush administration was an increased feeling that the only way they could become influential in determining the shape of global events was through the development of a multipolar global power arrangement. Of the three great powers, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) might be following internal balancing (military modernization) for the purpose of protecting itself from any contingency that would lead to a major skirmish with the United States (US).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. S. R. Graubard (1973) Henry Kissinger: Portrait of a Mind (NY: W. W. Norton & Company), pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Mann (2004) Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet (NY: Penguin Books), p. 162;

    Google Scholar 

  3. also see P. E. Tyler (March 8, 1992) ‘US Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop’, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/08/world/us-strategy-plan-calls-for-insuring-norivals-develop.html.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Excerpts From Pentagon’s Plan: “Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival”’ (March 8, 1992) The New York Times, http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/1990s/nyt030892b.html.

  5. T. Donnelly (September 2000) ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century’, A Report of The Project for the New American Century, http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Woodward (2006) State of Denial: Bush at War Part III (NY: Simon & Schuster), p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Woodward (2002) Bush At War (NY: Simon & Schuster), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. K. Betts (January—February 2003) also makes this point in his ‘Suicide From Fear of Death?’ Foreign Affairs, pp. 34–43,http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/58617/richard-k-betts/suicide-from-fear-of-death.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For recent evidence of this point, see P. Tyler (2009) A World of Trouble: The White House and the Middle East — from the Cold War to the War on Terror (NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux), especially Chapter 9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. C. Bobbitt (2002) The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History (NY: Random House), p. 685.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Col Qiao Liang and Col Wang Xiangsui, PLA (September 2002) ‘Unrestricted Warfare: China’s Master Plan to Destroy America’ (Los Angeles, CA: Pan American Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Keller (November 2004) ‘An appeal for new emphasis on antisubmarine warfare’, Military & Aerospace Electronics, http://mae.pennnet.com/articles/article_display.cfm?article_id=215443.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The entire discussion of this paragraph is from A. Erickson (2008) ‘Can China Become a Maritime Power?’ in Chap. 5 of T. Yoshihara and J. Holmes, Asia Looks Seaward: The Emerging Dynamics of Regional Sea Power (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International), pp. 70–110.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Dombey (April 1, 2009) ‘The US and China: A close–but complex—relationship’, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/853549d0-1d88-11de-9eb3-00144feabdc0.html.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Hamlin and L. Yanping (August 16, 2010) ‘China Overtakes Japan as World’s Second-Biggest Economy’, Bloomberg News, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-16/china-economy-passes-japan-s-in-second-quartercapping-three-decade-rise.html.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Zachariahs and R. Harui (August 15, 2010) ‘China Favors Euro Over Dollar as Bernanke Alters Path’, Inforwars.com, http://www.infowars.com/china-favors-euro-over-dollar-as-bernanke-alters-path/.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Ehsan M. Ahrari

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahrari, E.M. (2011). The Hegemon’s Maneuvers. In: The Great Powers versus the Hegemon. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348431_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics