Skip to main content

From Automata to Automation: The Birth of the Robot in R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots)

  • Chapter
Automata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre History
  • 396 Accesses

Abstract

Karel Čapek’s science fiction melodrama R.U.R. or Rossum’s Universal Robots (1920) dreamed up a new category of automaton workers called Robots. The word ‘Robot’ is derived from the Czech robota meaning ‘drudgery’ or ‘servitude’; a robotnik is Czech for both worker and serf or peasant. (Robot is always capitalized, since it is a trade-marked brand name.) R.U.R. enjoyed enough cultural capital that the play introduced the word Robot into the lexicon. The R.U.R. factory, an early-adopter of acronyms (R.U.R. stands for Rossum’s Universal Robots), is located on a remote island in the future where Robot workers are manufactured. (A poster from the Prague production listed the year as 2000, although the date is never specified in any version of the script.) An island setting is traditional for both science fiction and utopian literature: think of Thomas More’s Utopia, Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis, or H. G. Wells’s Island of Dr Moreau. But like most utopian literature of the twentieth century, the world of R.U.R. is distinctly dystopian. Over the decade that passes during the course of the play, Robots replace human beings as workers in all areas of industry, including in the military. These replacement Robots allow humans the ultimate leisure time. However, certain Robots are surreptitiously given larger brains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jeremy Black, Warfare in the Western World (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press: 2001) 62.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ivan Klima, ‘Introduction’, R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots), trans. Claudia Novack (New York: Penguin Classics, 2004) ix.

    Google Scholar 

  3. William E. Harkins, ‘Karel Čapek’s R.U.R. and A. N. Tolstoj’s Revolt of the Machines’, The Slavic and East European Journal 4.4 (1960): 312. See also William E. Harkins, Karel Čapek (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Derek Sayer, Coasts of Bohemia: A Czech History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000) 326. RUR was revived in 1939 and played for 25 performances, the last on 4 April 1939 shortly after the Nazi invasion.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jarka M. Burian, ‘Post-War Drama in Czechoslovakia’, Educational Theatre Journal 25.3 (1973): 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivan Klíma, Karel Čapek: Life and Work, trans. Norma Comrada (North Haven, CT: Catbird Press, 2002) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bohuslava R. Bradbrook, Karel Čapek: In Pursuit of Truth, Tolerance, and Trust (Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 1998) 49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Samuel L. Leiter, The Encyclopedia of the New York Stage, 1920–1930 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985) 742.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander Woolcott, ‘The Reviewing Stand’, The New York Herald, 10 October 1922: in clippings file R.U.R. at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harold B. Segeny, Pinnochio’s Progeny (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995) 311.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dennis Jerz, Technology in American Drama, 1920–50 (Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press, 2003) 5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karel Čapek, R.U.R., Rossum’s Universal Robots, trans. Claudia Novack (New York: Penguin Classics, 2004). All future citations are taken from this translation and the page numbers are given. Both the New York and London production made use of Nigel Playfair’s adaptation of R.U.R. I am assured by Slovak languages experts that the Novack translation is more accurate, which is why I use it here.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharon L. King, ‘Women and Robots in Čapek’s R.U.R. and Pavlovsky’s El Robot’, in Women in Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989) 101.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pamela H. Smith, The Body of the Artisan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004) 7. It should be noted that many have made a case for the union between intellectuals and artisans in the Renaissance.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., 41.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert, eds, Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnare raisonné de Sciences, des Arts and des Métiers (Paris: 1751–2), 2: 98 (‘Bas’).

    Google Scholar 

  20. William Sewell, ‘Visions of Labor: Illustrations of the Mechanical Arts before, in, and after Diderot’s Encyclopédie’, Work in France: Representations, Meaning, Organization, and Practice, ed. Steven Lauren and Cynthia J. Koepp (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986) 277.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simon Schaeffer, ‘Babbage’s Dancer’, Cultural Babbage: Technology, Time and Invention, ed. Francis Spufford and Jenny Uglow (London: Faber & Faber 1996) 55. See also Simon Schaeffer, ‘Babbage’s Intelligence Calculating Engines and the Factory System’, Critical Inquiry. 21.1 (1994) 203–27.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barbara Bengals, ‘Read History: Dehumanization in Karel Čapek’s R.U.R.’, in The Mechanical God: Machines in Science Fiction, ed. Thomas P. Dunn and Richard D. Erlich (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Philadelphia Public Ledger, cited in Norman Nader’s Pictorial History of the Theatre Guild (New York: Crown, 1969) 19.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Corbin, ‘A Czechoslovak Frankenstein’, New York Times (10 October 1922) 16.

    Google Scholar 

  25. William E. Harkins, Karel Čapek (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1962) 90–2.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karel Čapek, ‘The Meaning of R.U.R’, Saturday Review 136 (23 July 1923): 79.

    Google Scholar 

  27. James D. Naughton, ‘Futurology and Robots: Karel Čapek’s R.U.R.’, Renaissance and Modern Studies 28 (1984): 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Kara Reilly

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reilly, K. (2011). From Automata to Automation: The Birth of the Robot in R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots). In: Automata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347540_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics