Abstract
‘Psychiatry’, suggests Hornstein (2009a: 6), ‘is the most contested field in medicine’ and, as Bracken and Thomas (2001: 724) note, ‘[i]t is hard to imagine the emergence of “antipaediatrics” or “critical anaesthetics” movements’. But why is this so? One of the reasons is that there is often a fundamental disagreement about the meaning attributed to experience and, who has the right to confer that meaning. Experiences like paranoia are often decontextualized and stripped of meaning. For example, psychiatry variously classifies paranoia as a subtype of schizophrenia, a separate delusional disorder or as a type of personality disorder. Yet arcane discussions of the differences between diagnostic subtypes distract from commonalities in the way paranoia is experienced.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 David J. Harper
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harper, D.J. (2011). The Social Context of Paranoia. In: Rapley, M., Moncrieff, J., Dillon, J. (eds) De-Medicalizing Misery. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230342507_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230342507_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-30791-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-34250-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)