Abstract
As in my study of curriculum studies in South Africa (Pinar 2010) and Brazil (Pinar 2011), I summarize the exchanges between the participating scholars and international panel members. From this summary I derive concepts and practices characteristic of curriculum studies in Mexico. These emerged not only through the exchanges—accented by the individuality of the participants and panel members—and the preceding chapters but through my ongoing preoccupations as well. These preoccupations— disciplinarity, life history, dialogue—have structured the study.1 Before going to press, I shared my summary of the exchanges and my identification of key concepts and practices with the participants, asking them to correct any errors and register their disagreements in the epilogue, the “final word.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, Bernadette M. 2001. In Perpetual Motion: Theories of Power, Educational History, and the Child New York: Peter Lang.
Brooks, David. 2010, June 8. “History for Dollars.” The New York Times, June 8, A23.
Chambers, Cynthia. 2003. “‘As Canadian as Possible Under the Circumstances’: A View of Contemporary Curriculum Discourses in Canada.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 221–252. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
de Alba, Alicia, Edgar González Gaudiano, Colin Lankshear, and Michael Peters. 2000. Curriculum in the Postmodern Condition New York: Peter Lang.
Díaz Barriga, Ángel. 2003. “Curriculum Research: Evolution and Outlook in Mexico.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 443–456. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Díaz Barriga, Ángel. 2010. Email Communication with the author, from Vancouver, Canada to Mexico City, May 22, 2010.
Díaz Barriga, Frida. 2003. “Main Trends of Curriculum Research in Mexico.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 457–469. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dillon, Sam. 2010. “A Tentative Contract Deal for Washington Teachers.” The New York Times, April 8, A14.
Feeney, Silvina, and Flavia Terigi. 2003. “Curriculum Studies in Argentina: Documenting the Constitution of the Field.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 101–108. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gershon, Walter, ed. 2010. The Collaborative Turn: Working Together in Qualitative Research Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Grafton, Anthony T. 2010. “Britain: The Disgrace of the Universities.” The New York Review of Books LVII (6): 32.
Grant, George. 2005a. “Introduction to the Carleton Library Edition of Lament for a Nation (lxix—lxxvi).” Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Grant, George. 2005b. Lament for a Nation 40th Anniversary Edition. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Grumet, Madeleine R. 2009. “The Public Expression of Citizen Teachers.” Journal of Teacher Education: XXX: 1–11.
Hall, David L.1994. Richard Rorty: Prophet and Poet of the New Pragmatism Albany: State University of New York Press.
Judt, Tony. 2009. “What Is Living and What Is Dead in Social Democracy?” The New York Review of Books LVI (20): 86–88, 92, 94, 96.
Kliebard, Herbert M. 2000. “Reappraisal: The Tyler Rationale.” School Review (1970), 259–272. Reprinted in Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualization, ed. William F. Pinar, 70–83. Troy, NY: Educator’s International Press.
Kroker, Arthur. 1984. Technology and the Canadian Mind: Innis/McLuhan/Grant Montreal: New World Perspectives.
Malewski, Erik, ed. 2009. Curriculum Studies Handbook: The Next Moment New York: Routledge.
Moreira, Antonio Flavio Barbosa. 2003. “The Curriculum Field in Brazil: Emergence and Consolidation.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 171–184. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Muller, Johan. 2000. Reclaiming Knowledge: Social Theory, Curriculum and Education Policy London: Routledge.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Palamidessi, Mariano, and Daniel Feldman. 2003. “The Development of Curriculum Thought in Argentina.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 109–122. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Paras, Eric. 2006. Foucault 2.0: Beyond Power and Knowledge New York: Other Press.
Pinar, William F. 2004. What Is Curriculum Theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pinar, William F. 2007. Intellectual Advancement through Disciplinarity: Verticality and Horizontality in Curriculum Studies Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Pinar, W. F. 2009b. “The Unaddressed T of Ideology Critique.” Power and Education 1 (2): 189–200. Available online at: http://www.wwwords.co.uk.
Pinar, William F. 2009b. “The Next Moment.” In Curriculum Studies Handbook: The Next Moment, ed. Erik Malewski, 528–533. New York: Routledge.
Pinar, William F. 2009c. The Worldliness of a Cosmopolitan Education: Passionate Lives in Public Service New York: Routledge.
Pinar, William F., ed. 2010a. Curriculum Studies in South Africa New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinar, William F. 2010b. “The Eight-Year Study.” Curriculum Inquiry 40 (2): 295–316.
Pinar, William F. 2010c. “Foreword.” In Handbook of Public Pedagogy, ed. Jennifer A. Sandlin, Brian Schultz and Steven Burdick, xv-xix. New York: Routledge.
Pinar, William F., ed., 2011. Curriculum Studies in Brazil New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinar, William F. 2012. What Is Curriculum Theory? 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Pinar, William F., and Madeleine R. Grumet. 1981. In Rethinking Curriculum Studies, ed. Martin Lawn and Len Barton, 20–42. London: Croom Helm.
Ransom, John S. 1997. Foucault’s Discipline: The Politics of Subjectivity Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rauch, Angelika. 2000. The Hieroglyph of Tradition: Freud, Benjamin, Gadamer, Novalis, Kant Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Ravitch, Diane. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education New York: Basic Books.
Roberts, David D. 1995. Nothing but History: Reconstruction and Extremity after Metaphysics Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Rorty, Richard. 1991. Essays on Heidegger and Others Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saul, John Ralston. 2005. The Collapse of Globalism: And the Reinvention of the World Toronto: Viking Canada.
Taubman, Peter M. 2009. Teaching by Numbers: Deconstructing the Discourse of Standards and Accountability in Education New York: Routledge.
Viano, Maurizio. 1993. A Certain Realism: Making Use of Pasolini s Film Theory and Practice Berkeley: University of California Press.
Watkins, Mel. 2007. “Reflections on Being Born in a Group of Seven Canvas That Is Magically Transformed into a Sensuous Eleanor Bond Painting.” In Beyond Wilderness: The Group of Seven, Canadian Identity, and Contemporary Art, ed. John O’Brian and Peter White, 161–165. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2011 William F. Pinar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinar, W.F. (2011). Curriculum Studies in Mexico: The Exchanges, the Concepts, the Practices. In: Pinar, W.F. (eds) Curriculum Studies in Mexico. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337886_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337886_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29612-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-33788-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)