Grading Up or Fading Out?

The Elusive Destiny of Psychic Market Proximity-Seeking Subsidiaries in Central and Eastern Europe
  • Stefan Eckert
  • Frank Rossmeissl

Abstract

Foreign subsidiaries play an important role in the restructuring and transformation of former centrally planned economies. As these foreign entities are embedded in international networks, their existence may lead to cross-border transfer of knowledge, managerial and marketing skills (Manea and Pearce, 2001b) that “promote the diffusion of new technologies through direct linkages or spillovers to domestic firms” (Altomonte and Guagliano, 2001: 4). Such effects should be appreciated as they tend to strengthen the international competitiveness of transition economies. However, the beneficial effects that foreign subsidiaries exert on the competitiveness of the host country depend, among other things, on the role that these subsidiaries have been assigned to perform in the international and sometimes global corporate network.

Keywords

European Union Foreign Direct Investment Foreign Market Parent Company Foreign Subsidiary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal, J. (1996). Does foreign direct investment contribute to unemployment in home countries?—An empirical study. Working paper 765, University of Kiel.Google Scholar
  2. Altomonte, C. and Guagliano, C. (2001). Competing locations? Market potential and FDI in Central and Eastern Europe vs. the Mediterranean. LICOS Centre for Transition Economics. Discussion paper 108/2001, KUL, Leuven.Google Scholar
  3. Altzinger, W. (1997). Scope and structure of Austria’s foreign direct investment in the CEECs. Background Paper, presented at the PHARE Conference on “Integration and transition in Europe”, Budapest, 11–14 September.Google Scholar
  4. Altzinger, W. (1998). Austria’s foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe: “Supply based or market driven”. Working paper 57, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  5. Altzinger, W. and Maier, G. (1998). Cross-boarder development in the Vienna-Bratislava region: a review, in U. Graute (ed.) Sustainable Development for Central and Eastern Europe–Spatial Development in the European Context. Berlin: Springer, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders. The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Managing Across Borders. The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Behrmann, J. (1984). Industrial Policies: International Restructuring and Transnationals. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  9. Benito, G., Grogaard, B. and Narula, R. (2003). Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: economic integration and the Nordic countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (5), 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bevan, A. and Estrin, S. (2000). The determinants of foreign direct investment in transition economics. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion paper 2638, William Davidson Institute. Working paper 342, University of Michigan, and Centre for New and Emerging Markets, Discussion paper 9, London Business School.Google Scholar
  11. Birkinshaw, J. and Morrison, A.J. (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (4), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borsos, J. (1995). Domestic employment effects of Finish FDIs in Eastern Europe. ETLA, B. 111, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  13. D’Cruz, J. (1986). Strategic management of subsidiaries, in H. Etemad and L.S. Dulude (eds) Managing the Multinational Subsidiary. Response to Environmental Changes and to Host Nation R0000D Policies. London and Sidney: Croom Helm, 75–89.Google Scholar
  14. Dunning, J. (1977). Trade, location of economic activity and the multinational enterprise: a search for an eclectic approach, in B. Ohlin, P.O. Hesselborn and P.M. Wijkman (eds) The International Allocation of Economic Activity. London: Macmillan, 395–418.Google Scholar
  15. Dunning, J. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Workingham: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. EBRD (1994). Economic Transition in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Transition Report, October, Chapter 9. London: EBRD Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Engelhard, J. and Eckert, S. (1993). Markteintrittsverhalten deutscher Unternehmen in Osteuropa. Der Markt, 32 (4), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engelhard, J. and Eckert, S. (1995). Market entry strategies of German firms and industrial transformation in Eastern Europe, in R. Culpan and B.N. Kumar (eds) Transformation Management in Post-communist Countries–Organizational Requirements for a Market Economy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 153–171.Google Scholar
  19. Feichtinger, C. and Fink, G. (1999). Der kollektive Kulturschock im Postkommunismus. Journal for East European Management Studies, 4 (2), 128–147.Google Scholar
  20. Ferdows, K. (1989). Mapping international factory networks, in K. Ferdows (ed.) Managing International Manufacturing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 3–21.Google Scholar
  21. Forsgren, M. and Pedersen, T. (1998). Centres of excellence in multinational companies: the case of Denmark, in J. Birkinshaw and N. Hood (eds) Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. London: Macmillan, 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Genco, P., Taurelli, S. and Viezzoli, C. (1993). Private investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Working paper 7, EBRD Publications, London.Google Scholar
  23. Ghoshal, S. and Nohria, N. (1989). Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (4), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta, A. and Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16 (4), 768–792.Google Scholar
  25. Jarillo, J. and Martinez, J. (1990). Different roles for subsidiaries: the case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (7), 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm–a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johanson, J. and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm–four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12 (3), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaufmann, F. and Menke, A. (1997). Direktinvestitionen und ihre Beschäftigungseffekte: Eine empirische Analyse mittelständischer Engagements in den Visegrâd-Staaten. Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 42 (2), 101–113.Google Scholar
  29. König, M. (2001). Empirische Analyse des Zeitpunktes schweizerischer Direktinvestitionen in Osteuropa. Working paper 01/01, Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  30. Kumar, B. and Epple, P. (1997). Exporte, Kooperationen und Auslandsgesellschaften als Stationen des Lernens im Internationalisierungsprozess, in K. Macharzina and M. -J. Oesterle (eds) Handbuch Internationales Management. Gabler: Wiesbaden, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kutschker, M. (2002). Internationalisierung der Unternehmensentwicklung, in K. Macharzina and M. -J. Oesterle (eds) Handbuch Internationales Management, 2nd edition. Gabler: Wiesbaden, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lankes, H.-P. and Venables, A. (1996). Foreign direct investment in economic transition: the changing pattern of investments. Economics of Transition, 4 (2), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 83 (3), 92–102.Google Scholar
  34. Manea, J. and Pearce, R. (2001a). Industrial restructuring in European transition economies and MNEs’ investment motivations. Working paper, University of Reading.Google Scholar
  35. Manea, J. and Pearce, R. (2001b). Multinational strategies and sustainable industrial transformation in CEE transition economies: the role of technology, in J. Taggart, M. Berry and M. McDermortt (eds) Multinationals in a New Area. International Strategy and Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 118–140.Google Scholar
  36. Marinov M. and Marinova, S. (2000). Foreign direct investment in the emerging markets of Central and Eastern Europe: motives and marketing strategies, in A. Yaprak and H. Tütek (eds) Globalization, the Multinational Firm, and Emerging Economies. Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 10. New York: Elsevier, 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meissner, H. (1997). Der Kulturschock in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, in J. Engelhard (ed.) Interkulturelles Management–Theoretische Fundierung und funktionsbereichsspezifische Konzepte. Gabler: Wiesbaden, 1–12.Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, K. (1998). Direct Investment in Economies in Transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Neudorfer, P. (1997). The opening of Central and Eastern Europe: the case of Austrian foreign direct investment. Oesterreichische Nationalbank: Focus on Transition, 2, 52–68.Google Scholar
  40. Neudorfer, P. and Bach, W. (1995). 5 Jahre “Ostöffnung”–Österreichische Unternehmensbeteiligungen in Osteuropa, Informationen über multinationale Konzerne, Sondernummer: “5 Jahre Ostöffnung”, 14–21.Google Scholar
  41. OECD (1995). Foreign Direct Investment, Trade and Employment. OECD: Paris. Ohmae, K. (1985). Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Petrakos, G. (1996). The new geography of the Balkans: cross-border co-operation between Albania, Bulgaria and Greece. University Series of Transition in the Balkans, Volume 1, University of Thessaly, Volos.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, M. (1996). Wettbewerbsvorteile: Spitzenleistungen erreichen und behaupten. Campus: Frankfurt/Main.Google Scholar
  44. Pye, R. (1997). Foreign direct investment in Central Europe–results from a survey of major investors. Finance working paper A.97(1), City University, London.Google Scholar
  45. Savin, V. (2002). Homo (Post-)Sovieticus. Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 47(4), 376–406.Google Scholar
  46. Schieritz, M. (2003). Ungarns Krise dämpft Osteuropa-Euphorie. Financial Times Deutschland, 24 June, 16.Google Scholar
  47. Schmid, S. and Schurig, A. (2004). The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary’s business network. International Business Review, 12 (6), 755–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stankovsky, J. (1995). Österreichische Direktinvestitionen in Osteuropa, in Europa 1996–Auswirkungen einer EU-Osterweiterung. Bundeskanzleramt, Schriftenreihe Europa. Befreien Verlag: Wien, 157–192.Google Scholar
  49. Stankovsky, J. (2000). Institutionelle Rahmenbedingungen für die Osterweiterung der EU. Der Weg Osteuropas in die EU. Preparity Teilprojekt 1 ( Kurzfassung). WIIW: Wien.Google Scholar
  50. Surlemont, B. (1998). A typology of centres within multinational corporations: an empirical investigation, in J. Birkinshaw (ed.) Multinational Corporate and Subsidiary Development. London: Macmillan, 162–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taggart, J. (1997). Autonomy and procedural justice: a framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy. Journal of Business Strategies, 28 (1), 51–76.Google Scholar
  52. Ullmann, H. (2003). Der polnische Jungkonsumentenmarkt. Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 48 (2), 150–158.Google Scholar
  53. Vahlne, J.-E. and Nordström K. (1992). Is the globe shrinking? Psychic distance and the establishment of Swedish sales subsidiaries during the last 100 years. Paper presented at the annual conference of the international trade and finance association, 22–25 April, Laredo.Google Scholar
  54. Vincentz, V. (1995). Auswirkungen der wachsenden Arbeitsteilung zwischen Deutschland und seinen östlichen Nachbarn auf Arbeitsmarkt, Investitionen und Güterströme. Working paper 188, Osteuropa Institut, München.Google Scholar
  55. White, R. and Poynter, T. (1984). Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly, 49 (Summer), 59–69.Google Scholar
  56. Witkowska, J. (1999). Motivation der europäischen Firmen für Investitionen in Polen. Die Rolle der Integrationsprozesse. Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 44 (4), 403–427.Google Scholar
  57. Wolf, J. (1998). Wertepluralität in post-kommunistischen Gesellschaften. Komparative Befunde eines empirischen Forschungsprojektes, in H. Süssmuth (ed.) Transformationsprozesse in den Staaten Ostmitteleuropas 1989–1995. Baden-Baden: Nemos, 127–148.Google Scholar
  58. Yip, G. (1994). Total Global Strategy: Managingfor Worldwide Competitive Advantage. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stefan Eckert and Frank Rossmeissl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Eckert
  • Frank Rossmeissl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations