Skip to main content

A Good Kill: Socio-Technical Organizations of Farm Animal Slaughter

  • Chapter

Abstract

The practices of raising and killing animals for food have long been, and continue to be, the ‘most significant social formation of human-animal relations’ (Calvo 2008: 32). Globally, humans kill well over a billion cattle, sheep and pigs and over 16 billion chickens for food every year. Global meat production is projected to more than double from 229 million tonnes in 1999/2001 to 465 million tonnes in 2050 (FAO 2006). The sheer scale of these numbers is impossible to digest; 16,000,000,000 chickens killed every year. The profound consequences of these practices in terms of biodiversity, habitat destruction and greenhouse gas emissions are beginning to be made visible and become part of the political discourses around climate change and conservation (see FAO’s 2006 report ‘Livestock’s long shadow’).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anil, M., Raj, A. and McKinstry, J. (1998) ‘Electrical stunning in commercial rabbits: effective currents, spontaneous physical activity and reflex behaviour’, Meat Science 48 (1/2): 21–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, K. H. (2005) ‘The legal status of Muslims in the UK’, in R. Aluffi and G. Zincone (eds) The Legal Treatment Of Islamic Minorities In Europe, Leuven: Peeters

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy (1789) Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, chapter 17, footnote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J. (2006) ‘Conflicts around slaughter in modernity’, in Killing Animals (The animal studies group), University of Illinois Press: Urbana, pp. 120–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, E. (2008) ‘Most farmers prefer Blondes’ — dynamics of anthroparchy in animals ‘becoming meat’, The Journal of Critical Animal Studies 6 (1): 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2007) Religious Slaughter: The Public Debate and Market Transparency, Dialrel Project UK country report sub deliverable (Task 4.1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. J., Lakoff, A. and Rabinow, P. (2004) ‘Biosecurity: towards an anthropology of the contemporary’, Anthropology Today 22 (5): 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (2007) ‘The welfare of poultry at slaughter or killing’, available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/welfare/documents/poultrywelfare.pdf

  • Deleuze, G. (1994) Difference and Repetition, Paris: Presse Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2004) The Logic of Sense, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1996) Kinds of Minds, New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, A. and Wood, D. (2004) ‘Surveilling strange materialities: categorisation in the evolving geographies of FMD biosecurity in the UK’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22 (3): 373–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Report ‘Livestock’s long shadow’, accessed at http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.HTM

  • Farm Animal Welfare Council (2003) ‘Report on the welfare of farmed animals at slaughter or killing — Part 1: Red meat animals’, accessed at http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://www.fawc.org.uk/reports.htm&ei=OMwvS5HRLZe7jAeetenXAg&sa=X&oi=nshc&resnum=1&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CAgQzgQoAA&usg=AFQjCNEeVdPfp0rInHMY39q2sCz0wDlnlA

  • Farm Animal Welfare Council (2009) ‘Report on the welfare of farmed animals at slaughter or killing — Part 2: White meat animals’, accessed at http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://www.fawc.org.uk/reports.htm&ei=OMwvS5HRLZe7jAeetenXAg&sa=X&oi=nshc&resnum=1&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CAgQzgQoAA&usg=AFQjCNEeVdPfp0rInHMY39q2sCz0wDlnlA

  • Gibson, T., Johnson, C., Murrell, J., Mitchinson, S., Stafford, K. and Mellor, D. (2009) ‘Electroencephalographic responses to concussive non-penetrative captive-bolt stunning in halothane-anaesthetised calves’, New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57 (2): 90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008) When Species Meet, London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. and Henson, S. (2001) Consumer Concerns About Animal Welfare and the Impact on Food Choice. EU FAIR CT98–3678 Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (2007) ‘“How shall I say it …?” Relating the nonrelational’, Environment and Planning A 39: 590–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M., Degen, M. and Whatmore, S. (2005) ‘Urban wild things: a cosmopolitical experiment’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23: 643–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1984) What is an Animal? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993) The Pasteurisation of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1991) ‘Technology is society made durable’, in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1991) (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1994) Organising Modernity, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2006) After Method Mess in Social Science Research, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDuff, C. (2003) ‘At a slaughterhouse, some things never die’, in C. Wolfe (ed.) Zoontologies. The Question of the Animal, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 183–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masri, A.-H. (2007) Animal Welfare in Islam, London: Islamic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinstry, J. L. and Anil, M. H. (2004) ‘The effect of repeat application of electrical stunning on the welfare of pigs’, Meat Science 67 (1): 121–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popke, J. (2009) ‘Geography and ethics: non-representational encounters, collective responsibility and economic difference’, Progress in Human Geography 33: 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, Emma J. (2010) ‘Ethics and the non-human: the matterings of sentience in the meat industry’, in B. Anderson and P. Harrison (eds) Taking-place: Non-Representational Theories and Geographies, Farnham, GB, Ashgate, pp. 261–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M (2002) ‘The “ethical” space of the abattoir: on the (in)human(e) slaughter of other animals’, Human Ecology Review 9 (2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2004) Partial Connections, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2004) ‘Summoning life’ in P. Cloke, P. Crang, and M. Goodwin (eds) Envisioning Human Geographies, London: Arnold, pp. 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialles, N. (1994) Animal to Edible, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, K. S. and Portmess, L. (2001) Religious Vegetarianism: From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (2006) ‘Animal sentience and animal welfare: what is it to them and what is it to us?’, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1991) ‘Configuring the user: the case of usability trials’ in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R. (2004) ‘Humanity and inhumanity. Toward a sociology of the slaughterhouse’, Organization & Environment 17 (2): 260–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Marc Higgin, Adrian Evans and Mara Miele

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Higgin, M., Evans, A., Miele, M. (2011). A Good Kill: Socio-Technical Organizations of Farm Animal Slaughter. In: Carter, B., Charles, N. (eds) Human and Other Animals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321366_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics