Skip to main content

‘Most Farmers Prefer Blondes’: Social Intersectionality and Species Relations

  • Chapter
Human and Other Animals

Abstract

In the British farming calendar, the Royal Smithfield Show has historically been one of the major events. During one visit, I was sharply reminded of the gendering of agricultural animals on encountering a stand on which there were three pale honey coloured cows, some straw, a bucket of water and Paul, a farmer’s assistant. Two cows were lying down while the one in the middle stood and shuffled. Each cow sported a chain around her neck with her name on it. The one in the middle was named ‘Erica’. Above the stand was a banner that read ‘Most farmers prefer Blondes’, a reference to the name given to this particular breed, the Blonde D’Aquitaine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, Carol J. (1990) The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Carol J. and Proctor-Smith, Marjorie (1993) ‘Taking life or taking on life?’ in Carol J. Adams (ed.) Ecofeminism and the Sacred, New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2000) The Postmodern Animal: Essays in Art and Culture, London: Reaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, Ted (1993) Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights and Social Justice, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, Fritjof (1996) The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter, London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Peter (Ed.) The Meat Hygienist (Journal of the Association of Meat Inspectors).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, Erika (2003) Environment and Society, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, Erika (2005) Developing Ecofeminist Theory: The Complexity of Difference, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, Erika (2007) ‘Complexity theory and the sociology of natures’, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 2 (3): 351–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, Erika (2008) ‘“Most farmers prefer blondes” — dynamics of anthroparchy in animals’ becoming meat’, The Journal of Critical Animal Studies 6 (1): 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, Erika (2011) Social Lives with Other Animals: Tales of Sex, Death and Love, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. (1990) Simple in Means, Rich in Ends, London: Greenprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Josephine (2006) ‘Feminism and the treatment of animals: from care to dialogue’, Signs 31 (2): 305–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Josephine and Adams, Carol J. (Eds) (1996) Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Ethic for the Treatment of Animals, New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Adrian (1999) Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunayer, Joan (2004) Speciesism, Derwood, MD: Ryce Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. (2008) When Species Meet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, Lesley (2004) If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connections with Animals, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1993) We Have Never Been Modern Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, Leslie (2005) ‘The complexity of intersectionality’, Signs 30 (3): 171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. (1989) Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Sheep Association (November/December 1994), The Sheep Farmer 14 (3), Malvern, Worcs.: National Sheep Association Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nibert, David (2002) Animal Rights/Human Rights: Entanglements of Oppression and Liberation, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1990) Animal Liberation, 2nd edn, New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statutory Instruments (1991) No. 984 FOOD: The Slaughterhouse (Hygiene) and Meat Inspection (Amendment) Regulations 1991, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, Bob (2007) Making a Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights, Oakland, CA.: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, Sylvia (1990) Theorizing Patriarchy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2010) What is Posthumanism? Minneaopolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Erika Cudworth

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cudworth, E. (2011). ‘Most Farmers Prefer Blondes’: Social Intersectionality and Species Relations. In: Carter, B., Charles, N. (eds) Human and Other Animals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321366_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics