Advertisement

South-South Development Cooperation: A Contemporary Perspective

  • Francisco Simplicio
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

While Development Cooperation (DC) has so far been largely a North-South phenomenon —with donors being Northern countries and recipients Southern countries — there is now an opportunity to modify this global paradigm through addition of a complementary and growing South-South DC relationship. Many countries in the South have built significant financial and technical capacities. They have begun to transfer some of these resources, on concessional and non-concessional terms, to other countries in the South in the context of an inclusive approach to the management of global problems, spreading the benefits of globalization more widely, creating new markets, building a wider foundation for sustainable economic growth. In recent years, building on a long history of assistance and other cooperation among developing countries, several Southern countries have become significant DC providers. A new dimension is clearly being added to development cooperation and, particularly for Africa and the Southern countries that remain specially disadvantaged, especially the Least Developed Countries (LDCs), the Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and the Small Island Developing States (SIDS); this is a promising development that requires consolidation and expansion.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment World Bank Development Cooperation Small Island Develop States African Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brautigam, Deborah (2008) ‘China Offering an Alternative to Aid,’ Financial Times, London, 28 June.Google Scholar
  2. Collier, Paul (2007) The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done About It? (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. The Economist (2007) ‘The Host with the Most: Where Do Africa’s Bankers Have a Meeting? Shanghai of Course,’ London, 19–25 May.Google Scholar
  4. The Economist (2007) ‘News from the Schools,’ 20 July, http://www.economist.com.
  5. The Economist (2007) ‘Sovereign-Wealth Funds: Keep your T-bonds, We’ll Take the Bank,’ 28 July.Google Scholar
  6. Kurlantzick, Joshua (2007) ‘How a New Class of Donor Countries is Sapping Western Power,’ The New Republic, 9 April.Google Scholar
  7. Manning, Richard (2006) ‘Will “Emerging Donors” Change the Face of International Co-operation,’ Development Policy Review, Vol. 24, No. 4 (London: Overseas Development Institute).Google Scholar
  8. Ocampo, Jose Antonio, Jan Kregel and Stephany Griffith-Jones (eds) (2007) International Finance and Development (New York: Orient Longman, Zed Books and Third World Network, in association with the UN).Google Scholar
  9. Polgreen, Lydia (2007) ‘Africa’s Storied Colleges, Jammed and Crumbling,’ The New York Times, 20 May.Google Scholar
  10. Research and Information System for Development Countries (RIS) (2007) World Trade and Development Report 2007: Building a Development-friendly World Trading System (New Delhi: Oxford University Press). correct detailGoogle Scholar
  11. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2002) ‘Knowledge of Technology and the Technology of Knowledge: New Strategies of Development,’ in Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, Carlos Lopes and Khalid Malik (eds) Capacity for Development: New Solutions to Old Problems (London and Sterling: Earthscan Publications Ltd and UNDP).Google Scholar
  12. Sundberg, Mark and Alan Gelb (2006) ‘Making Aid Work,’ Finance and Development, December, 43(4), http://www.relooney.info/0_Africa_37.pdf, date accessed 30 October 2010, page 1 to 10, the lines quoted in this text are from page 9 of the online PDF of the article.
  13. Tassell, Tony and Joanna Chung (2007) ‘The US $2500 billion Question: How Sovereign Wealth Funds are Muscling in on Global Markets,’ Financial Times, 25 May, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/60246632-0a5f-11dc-93ae-000b5df10621.html#axzz1NpUZTZTv, date accessed 7 September 2010.
  14. UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2006), World Economic and Social Survey 2006: Diverging Growth and Development, document E/2006/50/Rev.1.Google Scholar
  15. UN, Economic and Social Council (2007) Letter dated 18 June 2007 from the Permanent Representative of Austria to the UN addressed to the President of the Economic and Social Council, Vienna High-level Symposium: Preparing for the DC Forum, Country-level Experiences in Coordinating and Managing Development Cooperation, Annex, Document E/2007/80, 21 June 2007.Google Scholar
  16. UN General Assembly Resolution 60/1, 16 September 2005. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan021752.pdf, date accessed 5 September 2010.
  17. UNDP (2005) Third Cooperation Framework for SSC (2005–2007) Document DP/CF/SSC/Rev.1, 12 January.Google Scholar
  18. Wallis, William (2007) ‘Wen Calls for Delivery of Aid to Africa,’ Financial Times, 17 May.Google Scholar
  19. Wallis, William (2007) ‘China Changes Dynamics of African Loans,’ Financial Times, 19–20 May.Google Scholar
  20. Williamson, Hugh (2007) ‘G8 Calls for Increased Scrutiny of Aid,’ Financial Times, 28 March.Google Scholar
  21. Research and Information System for Developing Countries (2007) World Trade and Development Report 2007: Building a Development-friendly World Trading System (2007) (New Delhi: RIS and Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Yanosek, Kassia, Gregory Keever and Ryan J. Orr (2007) ‘Emerging-Market Infrastructure Investors: New Trends for a New Era,’ The Journal of Structured Finance, 12(4) pp. 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Francisco Simplicio 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Simplicio

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations