Skip to main content

Norms and All That: Progress in Research on EU Foreign Policy

  • Chapter
Making EU Foreign Policy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

Abstract

‘Economic giant, political dwarf!’ — ‘The EU does not get its act together’ — ‘The capability-expectation gap is widening’ (on the latter see Hill, 1993; for a most recent criticism of the EU’s inability to develop a coherent foreign policy see Howorth, 2010). These are only a few of the many indictments of the European Union’s (EU) foreign and security policy to be found in the editorials, but also occasionally in the scholarly literature. And yet it moves! As Daniel Thomas writes in this volume (ch.1), there have been more than 1,000 common strategies, common positions, and joint actions under Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) since 1993 and more than 2,000 foreign policy statements by the EU Council and Presidency between 1995 and 2008. In other words, cooperation on foreign policy matters is the rule rather than the exception in the EU — and the empirical case studies in this volume document it in detail. They show beyond doubt that the EU has emerged as a foreign policy actor which pursues rather coherent foreign policies — if it wants to and if the conditions are right. Thus, the EU’s actorness in foreign and security policy matters is no longer in question (see Sjursen, 2006). This is the first good news about this volume. It could be stated even more loudly and more clearly — particularly in light of the bad press that the EU’s foreign policy got recently in the context of Catherine Ashton’s appointment as EU ‘foreign minister’ (High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, to be precise) and the turbulent negotiations surrounding the European External Action Service (EEAS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Works cited

  • Adler, E. (2002) ‘Constructivism in International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, B. Simmons and T. Risse (eds) Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, pp.95–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsnaes, W. (2002) ‘Foreign Policy’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, pp.331–49.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T. (2005) ‘International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework’, International Organization, 59(4): 801–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (2005) ‘Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering “Normative Power Europe”’, Millennium, 33(3): 613–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne, F. (1972) ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, in R. Mayne (ed.) Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead. London: Fontana/Collins, pp.32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996) ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44: 952–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (1993) ‘The Capability Expectation Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4): 305–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, J. (2010) ‘The EU as a Global Actor: Grand Strategy for a Global Grand Bargain?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3): 455–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. (1986) ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization, 40(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, P. (2004) ‘The Metrosexual Superpower’, Foreign Policy, July—August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S.D. (1983) ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in S.D. Krasner (ed.) International Regimes. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, pp.1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2000) ‘The Method of Community in EU Decision-Making and Administrative Rivalry in the Council’s Infrastructure’, Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2): 261–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2005) ‘The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union’, International Organization, 59(4): 937–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magen, A., Risse, T. and McFaul, M. (eds) (2009) Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law. American and European Strategies. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2): 235–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basics of Politics. New York, London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J. P. (1998) ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’, International Organization, 52(4): 943–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (2005) Institutional Theoty in Political Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2000) ‘“Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in International Relations’, International Organization, 54(1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) ‘Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Enlargement of the EU’, International Organization, 55(1): 47–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2003) The EU, NATO, and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V.A. (2002) ‘Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare Adjustment?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35(2): 168–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V.A. (2008) ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen, H. (2006) ‘What Kind of Power?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2): 169–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization, 41(3): 335–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Thomas Risse

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Risse, T. (2011). Norms and All That: Progress in Research on EU Foreign Policy. In: Thomas, D.C. (eds) Making EU Foreign Policy. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307360_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics