Skip to main content

Structures of Access to Social Provision for Migrants

  • Chapter
Migration and Social Protection

Abstract

Low-income migrants are often more vulnerable and have poorer access to social provisioning than low-income non-migrants. The ethical and legal arguments for the right or entitlement of migrants to social provision have been discussed in Chapter 1. In this chapter we start from the hypothesis that being entitled or having a right to social provision does not guarantee that it is actually received. Of course, receiving welfare provision depends on formal entitlements specified in international and national laws, regulations and policies. Provision can be granted, denied, controlled and obscured at this level. However, successfully claiming social provision in practice turns on the way that individuals (formally entitled or not) are able to leverage opportunities for accessing resources. This hypothesis implies that getting the formal rules right is not enough.

While overlapping, ‘social provision’ is a broader concept than ‘social protection.’ The latter typically has a remit defined by instruments of provision and/or targeted populations. In this chapter we use the term ‘social provision’ as we are interested in the conceptual basis of access and distribution to all types of welfare provision and all types of groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agesa, J. and R. Agesa (1999) ‘Gender differences in the incidence of rural to urban migration: evidence from Kenya’, Journal of Development Studies, 35 (6), 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J. M. and J. P. Platteau (1996) Halting the Degradation of Natural Resources (Oxford: FAO and Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, P. (2004) ‘Conceptualising in/security regimes’, in Gough et al. (ed.) Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Britto, T. (2005) Recent Trends in the Development of Latin America: An Analysis of Conditional Cash Transfers (Brazil: Ministry of Social Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, A. and Maxwell, S. (1998) ‘Poverty and social exclusion in north and south’, IDS Bulletin, 29 (1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, A. et al. (2002) ‘Migration, livelihoods and institutions: contrasting patterns of migration in Mali’, Journal of Development Studies, 38 (5), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorward, A., Sabates-Wheeler, R., MacAuslan, I., Penrose Buckley, C., Kydd, J. and Chirwa, A. (2006) ‘Promoting Agriculture for Social Protection or Social Protection for Agriculture: Strategic Policy and Research Issues Discussion Paper’, paper prepared for the Future Agricultures Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. (1999) ‘Labor markets as gendered institutions: equality, efficiency and empowerment issues’, World Development, 27 (3), 611–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1994) Who pays for the Kids?: Gender and the Structures of Constraint (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, E. (2002) ‘Gender, migration and multiple livelihoods: cases from eastern and southern Africa’, Journal of Development Studies, 38 (5), 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. and Wood, G. (2004) ‘Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America’, in I. Gough, G. Wood, A. Barrientos, P. Bevan, P. Davis and G. Room (eds) Social Policy in Development Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, K. (2002) ‘Fulani on the move: seasonal economic migration in the Sahel as a social process’, Journal of Development Studies, 38 (5), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyer, J., F. Stewart and R. Thorp (2002) Group Behaviour and Development: Is the Market Destroying Cooperation? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations, and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1984) The Democratic Economy (Harmondsworth: Pelican Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, J. and Scoones, I. (2003) Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2003) ‘Across the sea and over the mountains: documenting Albanian migration’, Scottish Geographical Journal, 119 (3), 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku and Matani (2001) ‘Left out: immigrants’ access to health care and insurance’, Health Affairs, 20 (1), 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, G. (1975) ‘Marxism, access and the state’, Development and Change, 6 (2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D., S. Gupta, M. Mehta, V. Shah, J. Rees and the Kribp Project Team (2002) ‘Brokered livelihoods: debt, labour migration and development in tribal western India’, Journal of Development Studies, 38 (5), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pero, D. and Solomos, J. (2010) ‘Introduction: migrant politics and mobilisation: exclusion, engagements, incorporation’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33 (1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation (Boston, MA: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Boston, MA: Belkap).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rex, J. and R. Moore (1967) Race, Community and Conflict: A Study of Sparkbrook (London: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogaly, B., Coppard, D., Rafique, A., Rana, K., Sengupta, A. and Biswas, J. (2002) ‘Seasonal migration and welfare/illfare in eastern India: a social analysis’, in A. De Haan and B. Rogaly (eds) ’Labour Migration and Rural Society’, Journal of Development Studies, 38(5), 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2005) Co-operation in the Romanian Countryside: An Insight into Post-Soviet Agriculture (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2008) report prepared for DFID, available from author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabates-Wheeler, R. and MacAuslan, I. (2007) ‘Migration and social protection: exposing issues of access’, Development, 50 (4), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. (1995) ‘The operation of labour markets and the economics of equal opportunities’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds) The Economics of Equal Opportunities (Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. (1971) ‘Easiness of Access: A Concept of Queues’, IDS Communication Paper 104 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. (1973) ‘Improving Access to Public Services’, IDS Discussion Paper 23 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. (1986) ‘Access: A Theory of Corruption and Bureaucracy’, Public Administration and Development, 6 (4), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. and Lamb, G. (1974) ‘Exit, Voice and Access’, Social Science Information, 13 (6), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. and Lamb, G. (1981) Can Equity be Organised? (Farnborough: Gower Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. and Wen-Hsien, H. (1975) ‘Distribution and the theory of access’, Development and Change, 6 (2), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (2001) ‘Immigrant access to food stamps: overcoming barriers to participation’, Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty, Law, and Policy, September-October 2001, 260–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, P. (1986) ‘What’s gone wrong with public administration?’, Public Administration and Development, 6 (4), 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1981) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000) ‘Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny’, Social Development Papers No. 1, Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, K. (2001) ‘An Overview of Targeting Approaches For Food-Assisted Programming’, report prepared for CARE’s PHLS Unit (Atlanta, Georgia: CARE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smita (2006) Locked Homes, Empty Schools: The Impact of Distress Seasonal Migration on the Rural Poor (New Delhi: America India Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecklov, G., Winters, P., Stampini, M. and Davis, B. (2005) ‘Do conditional cash transfers affect migration? a study using experimental data from the Mexican PROGRESA program’, Demography, 42 (2), 769–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, R. and Matthews, Z. (2004) ‘Maternal health-care service use among rural-urban migrants in Mumbai, India’, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 19 (1), 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. (1996) ‘Groups for good or ill’, Oxford Development Studies, 24, 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Benda-Beckmann, K., van Eldijk, A., Spiertz, J. and Huber, F. (1989) ‘Interfaces and Janus-Faces: A critical appraisal of the interface approach in development sociology from a social-legal studies perspective’, in N. Long (ed.) Encounters at the Interface: A Perspective on Social Discontinuities in Rural Development (Wageningen: Agricultural University of Wageningen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. (1979) ‘Some preliminary notes on the subordination of women’, IDS Bulletin, 10 (3), 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (ed.) (1985) Labelling in Development Policy (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (1986) ‘ “Don’t give them my telephone number”–Applicants and clients: Limits to Public Responsibility’, Public Administration and Development, 6 (4), 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2003) ‘Staying secure, staying poor: the “Faustian Bargain”’, World Development, 31 (3), 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohry, A. (2002) ‘Rural-urban Migration in Egypt and other Developing Countries: A Statistical and Literature review’, in Rural to Urban Labour Migration: A Study of Upper Egyptian Labourers in Cairo, DPhil Thesis, University of Sussex, Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Ian MacAuslan and Rachel Sabates-Wheeler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacAuslan, I., Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2011). Structures of Access to Social Provision for Migrants. In: Sabates-Wheeler, R., Feldman, R. (eds) Migration and Social Protection. Rethinking International Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306554_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics